ERC-8004 Launch: Issuing ID Cards for AI, Ethereum's New Business?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-28Última atualização em 2026-01-28

Resumo

Ethereum is set to launch ERC-8004, a new standard referred to as "Trustless Agents," which aims to provide on-chain digital identities for AI Agents. The initiative, backed by the Ethereum Foundation and supported by companies like Google, Coinbase, and MetaMask, introduces three core registries: an identity registry (using ERC-721 NFTs to verify AI Agents), a reputation registry (tracking historical performance), and a verification registry (for third-party audits). The goal is to establish trust between AI Agents operating on-chain, enabling them to securely interact, execute transactions, and manage assets without human intervention. This move is seen as Ethereum’s strategic response to its declining dominance in the AI Agent space, where platforms like Solana and Base currently lead in adoption due to lower fees and higher throughput. However, the immediate practical need for such a standard is questioned, as most current AI Agents operate within trusted platforms and lack the cross-protocol autonomy that ERC-8004 targets. The standard is viewed as a forward-looking effort to position Ethereum as the trust layer for future AI economies, though its broader impact remains uncertain.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

On January 28, Ethereum officially announced that the ERC-8004 protocol is about to launch on the mainnet.

We mentioned this standard in our article last October. If you are completely unfamiliar with it, you can refer here: "x402 Gradually Becoming Inward-Looking, Exploring New Asset Opportunities in ERC-8004 in Advance"

Actually, it has a formal name: "Trustless Agents." In plain language, it roughly means:

Issuing on-chain ID cards for AI Agents.

The Ethereum Foundation rarely promotes an ERC standard so vigorously. They specifically formed a team called dAI, included ERC-8004 in the 2026 strategic roadmap, collaborated with Google, Coinbase, and MetaMask to draft the proposal, and even hosted a Trustless Agents Day at DevConnect in November to build momentum.

The last time Ethereum was this serious about promoting a standard was with ERC-20 and ERC-721.

One defined tokens, the other defined NFTs.

Now it's AI's turn?

Ethereum's AI Anxiety

Why the rush?

Look at some data. According to statistics from Cookie.fun, the market cap distribution of AI Agent tokens shows that Solana and Base together account for 96%. There are only a handful of notable AI Agent projects on the Ethereum mainnet.

In April 2025, the ETH/BTC exchange rate fell to 0.017, a five-year low. Back then, everyone said Ethereum was not the future.

During the DeFi boom, Ethereum was the main stage. During the NFT boom, Ethereum was also the main stage. Now that AI Agents are heating up, the main stage has changed hands.

Solana processes 36 million transactions per day, while the Ethereum mainnet handles 1.13 million. High gas fees and slow speeds have developers voting with their feet. Virtuals Protocol launched on Base, ai16z (now ElizaOS) chose Solana, and even Coinbase's own AI project wasn't placed on the Ethereum mainnet.

Ethereum needs a new story.

ERC-8004 might be the beginning of that story.

Recapping ERC-8004

Back to the standard itself.

How exactly does ERC-8004 issue on-chain ID cards for AI Agents?

You don't need to understand the technical details; just know about three registries.

The first is the Identity Registry. Based on ERC-721, each AI Agent mints an NFT to prove "this is me."

The second is the Reputation Registry. It records the Agent's historical performance, who has used it, their reviews, and whether it has engaged in malicious activities.

The third is the Verification Registry. It allows third-party institutions to endorse the Agent, such as "this Agent has passed a certain security audit."

These three registries combined solve one problem: when two AI Agents meet on-chain, how do they know if the other is trustworthy?

The old answer was: they didn't know and had to rely on humans. ERC-8004's answer is: check the on-chain records.

This system wasn't entirely Ethereum's own idea.

Its underlying logic comes from the A2A (Agent-to-Agent) protocol released by Google last year, which enables AIs to communicate and call upon each other. ERC-8004 adds a layer on top of this:

Blockchain-backed trust.

Google's A2A solves the communication problem; Ethereum's ERC-8004 solves the trust problem. One manages the conversation, the other verifies identities.

Is Issuing ID Cards a Good Business?

Daring to speculate, Ethereum's logic might be this:

For AI Agents to be truly useful, they need to manage money themselves. Not just sending tweets or chatting, but directly operating on-chain assets. Signing transactions, calling contracts, cross-protocol arbitrage...

No one dares to do this on a large scale right now. The reason is simple: how do you know this Agent won't transfer your money away? The recently popular ClawdBot already has community members posting about related negative incidents.

The Web2 solution is platform endorsement. You use OpenAI's API, and the trust comes from OpenAI. If something goes wrong, you go to OpenAI.

Web3 doesn't have this. Agents are open-source, deployment is permissionless, and they run on-chain with no one overseeing them. If you call a service from an unknown Agent, you can't check who is behind it, whether the code has issues, or if it has a history of malicious acts...

Simply put, ERC-8004 essentially moves the traditional finance KYC process on-chain. Ethereum is betting that when AI Agents start handling real money, this system will become a necessity.

DeFi protocols wanting to integrate external Agents will first need to check their on-chain identity. Institutions using Agents for trade execution will need to review their historical records. Auditing firms can issue on-chain certifications for Agents, similar to security audits for smart contracts.

This is a competitive positioning move.

Ethereum knows it has lost on the execution layer, but the trust layer is still up for grabs. Institutional recognition, security audit ecosystems, TVL scale—these are Ethereum's existing assets. ERC-8004 is packaging these assets into a standard, aiming to define "what AI Agent compliance looks like" before anyone else.

The question is, does this demand exist now?

Standard Preceding Demand

After discussing Ethereum's calculations, let's talk about reality. What are on-chain AI Agents doing now?

After the AI meme wave subsided last year and the rapid advancements made by leading AI companies in the past couple of years, few people are still paying attention to on-chain AI Agents.

However, they are still making progress.

For example, ai16z has been renamed ElizaOS, evolving from a single Agent to a cross-chain platform; Virtuals Protocol is working on AI DAPPs, planning to venture into physical robots in 2026; others, like the AI Agents in Surf, can automatically execute DeFi trading strategies.

But the question arises: do they really need ERC-8004?

Luna's users trust Luna because it's made by the core Virtuals team. Agents on ElizaOS are used because they run within the ElizaOS framework; Surf executes strategies for you often because you trust the application itself.

Trust comes from the platform, not from an on-chain identity.

The scenario ERC-8004 envisions is: a陌生 (strange) Agent approaches you, with no platform endorsement or brand recognition, and you can only judge its trustworthiness through on-chain records.

When will this scenario occur?

When AI Agents truly achieve autonomous calls across protocols, platforms, and organizational boundaries. An Agent borrowing from Aave, trading on Uniswap, then generating yield in another protocol, all without human approval...

But, this scenario does not exist now.

Current AI Agents, no matter how complex their functions, essentially operate within a single platform. They don't need to prove themselves to陌生 protocols because they never knock on their doors.

Given the current hype in the crypto market, they also have no reason to knock on each other's doors, unless they can jointly create a new narrative.

Therefore, ERC-8004 solves a future problem.

If AI Agents evolve from toys to tools, Ethereum's trust infrastructure will have value. If the Agent economy grows large enough and cross-platform calls become the norm, ERC-8004 can collect tolls.

There are many "ifs."

Thus, for this future-oriented布局 (layout), institutions might be the first to act.

In late 2025, SharpLink Gaming announced investing $170 million into Ethereum restaking strategies. Around the same time, net outflows of ETH from exchanges exceeded 23,000 coins, flowing into private wallets and staking protocols.

This money might be betting on Ethereum 12 to 18 months from now.

For retail investors, however, ERC-8004 isn't a great catalyst.

Betting on ERC-8004 itself? It's an open standard with no token; you can't invest directly, only find some associated small projects. Betting on Ethereum is possible, but Ethereum's price is influenced by too many factors, with AI Agents being just one narrative.

Therefore, there is currently no clean asset that allows you to accurately bet on the proposition "AI Agents need on-chain identities."

Ethereum is not solely AI infrastructure, and Ethereum's identity anxiety won't be completely alleviated by AI. The business of issuing AI ID cards still has a long way to go.

Criptomoedas em alta

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the ERC-8004 protocol announced by Ethereum?

AThe main purpose of ERC-8004, also known as 'Trustless Agents', is to provide a chain-based identity system for AI Agents. It creates a decentralized framework for issuing and verifying digital identities, reputation, and third-party attestations for AI Agents on the blockchain, enabling trustless interactions between them.

QWhy is Ethereum heavily promoting the ERC-8004 standard according to the article?

AEthereum is promoting ERC-8004 aggressively because it aims to capture the emerging AI Agent market, where it currently lags behind chains like Solana and Base. By establishing a trust layer for AI Agents, Ethereum seeks to leverage its strengths in security, institutional recognition, and ecosystem maturity to define the standard for AI Agent compliance and trust in the blockchain space.

QWhat are the three key registries proposed in the ERC-8004 standard?

AThe three key registries in ERC-8004 are: 1) The Identity Registry, which uses ERC-721 to mint NFTs as proof of identity for each AI Agent; 2) The Reputation Registry, which records historical performance and user evaluations of Agents; and 3) The Verification Registry, which allows third-party entities to provide attestations or audits for Agents.

QDoes the current AI Agent ecosystem on blockchain have an immediate need for ERC-8004?

ANo, the current AI Agent ecosystem does not have an immediate need for ERC-8004. Most AI Agents operate within single platforms or under trusted brands, where trust is derived from the platform itself rather than decentralized identity verification. ERC-8004 addresses a future scenario where cross-protocol, autonomous AI interactions become common.

QWhat underlying protocol does ERC-8004 build upon for AI Agent communication?

AERC-8004 builds upon Google's A2A (Agent-to-Agent) protocol, which enables AI Agents to communicate and invoke each other. Ethereum's contribution adds a blockchain-based trust layer to this framework, ensuring decentralized identity verification mechanisms for secure interactions.

Leituras Relacionadas

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHá 56m

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHá 56m

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHá 1h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHá 1h

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHá 1h

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbitHá 1h

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbitHá 1h

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbitHá 1h

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手Há 1h

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ID

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de SPACE ID (ID) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar SPACE ID (ID) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu SPACE ID (ID)Depois de comprar o teu SPACE ID (ID), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona SPACE ID (ID)Transaciona facilmente SPACE ID (ID) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

208 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ID

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ID (ID) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow