Crypto Tycoons Grace the Cover of 'Vanity Fair', Only to Face Widespread Ridicule Online

比推Publicado em 2026-03-18Última atualização em 2026-03-18

Resumo

Crypto industry leaders, including Cathie Wood (ARK Invest), Olaf Carlson-Wee (Polychain), and Michael Novogratz (Galaxy Digital), were featured in a *Vanity Fair* cover story titled “Crypto’s True Believers Want to Be Taken Seriously.” However, the article and its accompanying photos were widely mocked across social media. Rather than portraying the figures as serious innovators, the publication depicted them as eccentric and out-of-touch billionaires—highlighting their interests in extraterrestrial life, extreme survivalism, and going barefoot in public. Critics within the crypto community accused *Vanity Fair* of intentional ridicule, pointing to unflattering photo compositions and dismissive writing that reinforced negative stereotypes. The piece has sparked debate about the crypto industry’s relationship with mainstream media. Some, like Noelle Acheson, acknowledged the awkward portrayal but suggested it reflects how the industry is perceived externally. Others, including Jinelle D’Lima of Nozomi, argued that seeking validation from traditional gateways like *Vanity Fair* contradicts crypto’s original anti-establishment ethos. The incident underscores a cultural disconnect: despite the industry’s financial influence and political lobbying, it remains marginalized in mainstream cultural narratives. The backlash serves as a reminder that crypto’s real strength lies in its technology and decentralized values—not in mainstream approval.

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher

Original Title: Overnight, Crypto Tycoons Were Severely Played by 'Vanity Fair'

Overnight, a group photo of crypto tycoons flooded the X timelines of all crypto practitioners, accompanied by overwhelming ridicule and criticism.

The main subjects in the picture include industry heavyweights such as ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood, Polychain founder Olaf Carlson-Wee, and Galaxy Digital founder Michael Novogratz, but this still couldn't stop the storm from escalating even further.

Upon closer examination of this group photo, it becomes clear that it is a work from the venerable celebrity magazine 'Vanity Fair,' featured on the cover of its latest issue's report titled 'Cryptocurrency's True Believers Demand to Be Taken Seriously.'

This article, through close observation of the industry's core circle, delves into how the crypto industry, after enduring multiple rounds of regulatory storms and market crashes, is attempting to redefine the global power landscape in 2026 with massive political donations and a 'savior-like' grand narrative.

Although the stories of crypto industry tycoons have already appeared in a series of traditional magazines such as 'Fortune' and 'The New York Times,' 'Vanity Fair,' as a media outlet deeply versed in celebrity culture, clearly has a more 'sinister' reporting perspective. The article doesn't dwell too much on complex industry trends but instead spends a significant amount of ink on the starkly contrasting private life details of these 'power redefiners.'

In the author's portrayal, these billionaires are depicted as a group of eccentrics who are both detached from reality and eager to dominate it: on one hand, they discuss the future of human civilization in mansions in Puerto Rico, while on the other, they are obsessed with searching for extraterrestrial life, practicing extreme survivalism, and even often going barefoot in public.

Triple Crown Digital partner Noelle Acheson commented on this, saying, 'We can laugh all we want (and we really do want to laugh) at these 'Vanity Fair' photos, at the awkward poses and perplexing character portrayals... but the deeper question is: Is this how the mainstream media views the cryptocurrency industry? If so, we have a lot of work to do.'

In the eyes of most industry insiders, this article not only fails to positively portray the image of cryptocurrency practitioners but also highlights stereotypes about the crypto industry.

Tally co-founder Dennison Bertram further revealed that this article is 'Vanity Fair' magazine deliberately mocking cryptocurrency and its related figures, with both the text and photos filled with deep disdain and sarcasm. Before getting involved in cryptocurrency, he had worked as a fashion photographer for over a decade.

Analyzing Cathie Wood's close-up photo as an example, he said, 'Here, Cathie Wood is deliberately made to appear small. The camera shoots down on her, and the composition deliberately downplays her stature. The messy curtains, her crossed ankles, and the intentionally placed luggage cart all contribute to the deliberately created冷酷无情 (cold and ruthless) atmosphere in the picture. Could there be a more mean-spirited visual effect than this?'

Looking at Michael Novogratz's photo, 'His eyes are squinted, looking fierce. Why? Because he's wearing glasses. He's holding them, almost invisible. His face is deliberately cast in shadow, appearing very menacing. It's another mess, everything is crooked, nothing is整齐划一 (neat and uniform). Is this a positive image? I don't think so at all.'

A group of tycoons who rose to the top through the crypto industry originally attempted to seek more recognition and support from the outside world through 'Vanity Fair' magazine, but they didn't realize it was a huge 'trap,' instead appearing as clown-like figures in the public eye. This is undoubtedly a painful lesson.

At this point, the act of seeking recognition in mainstream magazines itself has become a target of criticism. Nozomi founder Jinelle D'Lima believes that Satoshi Nakamoto and the cypherpunks never sought approval. 'The key point is, you don't need their approval: capital flows don't need it, network operation doesn't need it, the functioning of everything doesn't need it. We weren't built to cater to 'Vanity Fair' or 'Forbes.' We were built to resist everything they represent: gatekeepers, the system, and those who decide what is legitimate and what is illegal.'

'Now we're on the cover. Could it be any more ironic? This isn't like us. We were never supposed to be these people,' Jinelle D'Lima said.

The reason 'Vanity Fair's' report has become a vortex of controversy is that it reveals an awkward predicament for the crypto industry: even if the industry tries to exchange astronomical political donations and 'capitulation' to the mainstream financial system for 'serious treatment' from mainstream circles, within the aesthetic and value systems of mainstream culture, these nouveau riche are still viewed as a subcultural group with cult-like overtones.

This PR disaster might be telling everyone: the true power of the crypto industry has never been in the glossy reports of mainstream media, but in the code that can operate just fine without needing to be 'taken seriously.'

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620917

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the group photo of crypto leaders on the cover of Vanity Fair spark widespread ridicule online?

AThe photo and accompanying article portrayed crypto leaders as eccentric and out-of-touch billionaires, highlighting their unconventional lifestyles and using unflattering visual compositions, which many in the industry felt reinforced negative perceptions and stereotypes.

QWhat was the main criticism from industry experts like Dennison Bertram regarding Vanity Fair's portrayal of crypto leaders?

ADennison Bertram, a former fashion photographer, criticized the magazine for intentionally mocking the figures through deliberate visual choices, such as unflattering angles, messy backgrounds, and shadowy lighting, which made them appear awkward or sinister.

QHow did the Vanity Fair article describe the private lives of crypto billionaires?

AThe article depicted them as 'weirdos' who are disconnected from reality yet aspire to dominate it, mentioning their interests in topics like alien life, extreme survivalism, and often going barefoot in public, while discussing humanity's future from luxury homes in Puerto Rico.

QWhat deeper issue did Noelle Acheson highlight about the Vanity Fair coverage?

ANoelle Acheson pointed out that the deeper issue is whether this portrayal reflects how mainstream media views the cryptocurrency industry, suggesting that if so, the industry still has significant work to do to improve its image and understanding.

QAccording to Jinelle D'Lima, why is seeking validation from mainstream publications like Vanity Fair contrary to crypto's original ethos?

AJinelle D'Lima argued that figures like Satoshi Nakamoto and cypherpunks never sought approval, as crypto was built to resist gatekeepers, institutions, and those who decide legitimacy—not to conform to mainstream validation through publications like Vanity Fair or Forbes.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbitHá 12m

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbitHá 12m

Strategy CEO Highlights Scenarios Where Company Would Sell Bitcoin — Report

Strategy CEO Phong Le outlined potential scenarios for the company to sell portions of its massive Bitcoin holdings, a departure from its "Never Sell" philosophy. In a CNBC interview, Le stated sales could occur to finance dividend payments for its Perpetual Preferred Stock if doing so increases shareholder value, defined as a rise in "Bitcoin per share." He emphasized a data-driven approach, prioritizing math over ideology. Other reasons include when the company's book value is below market value or to capture tax benefits. As the largest corporate holder with 818,334 BTC (~$65 billion), Strategy has significant annual dividend obligations (~$1.5 billion). Le believes the Bitcoin market's high liquidity (~$60B daily volume) can absorb such sales without major price impact. Bitcoin currently trades around $80,840.

bitcoinistHá 23m

Strategy CEO Highlights Scenarios Where Company Would Sell Bitcoin — Report

bitcoinistHá 23m

Crypto Funds See Six Consecutive Weeks of Net Inflows, CLARITY Act Drives $858 Million Influx

Global cryptocurrency investment products recorded a net inflow of $857.9 million last week, marking the sixth consecutive week of positive flows and the largest single-week inflow since April 24, according to CoinShares' latest report. The primary catalyst was legislative progress on the U.S. CLARITY Act, specifically the final compromise text for stablecoin yield provisions, alongside Bitcoin's price breaking above $80,000. U.S.-listed products dominated with $776.6 million in inflows, a significant jump from the prior week's $47.5 million. European markets also saw increased participation. Bitcoin products led with $706.1 million in inflows, while short-Bitcoin products experienced their largest weekly outflow of 2026, indicating unwinding bearish positions. Major altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, and XRP all saw renewed positive flows, with Ethereum reversing its prior week's outflow to attract $77.1 million. Total assets under management (AUM) climbed to $160 billion.

marsbitHá 26m

Crypto Funds See Six Consecutive Weeks of Net Inflows, CLARITY Act Drives $858 Million Influx

marsbitHá 26m

Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How Can You Not Feel Anxious When the Neighbor Lao Wang Earned 30x by Investing in Storage Stocks?

The author explores anxiety, attributing it to the amygdala's stress response, and suggests writing down worries to shift control to the rational prefrontal cortex, easing anxiety more effectively than mere reassurance. The piece then examines a source of financial anxiety in May 2026: a 150% surge in the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, with storage stock SNDK skyrocketing 38x. The author analyzes the underlying logic behind this boom, tracing it to soaring valuations of AI startups like Anthropic (Anth). Anth's reported $400 billion ARR is scrutinized, revealing that cumulative revenue since founding is only about $108 billion, with the company still losing billions monthly and relying on continuous funding (having raised $723 billion). The author contrasts Anth's $1+ trillion valuation speculation with Berkshire Hathaway's fundamentals ($3.7 trillion revenue, $669 billion profit, $4 trillion cash, $1 trillion market cap), questioning the belief that a loss-making, funding-dependent startup could be worth more than the established giant. The narrative concludes by linking the massive valuations of Anth and OpenAI to a surge in AI industry capital expenditure (capex), which in turn fueled the storage sector's prosperity, setting the stage for a further discussion.

marsbitHá 37m

Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How Can You Not Feel Anxious When the Neighbor Lao Wang Earned 30x by Investing in Storage Stocks?

marsbitHá 37m

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

In South Korea's dating scene, SK Hynix employees are now highly sought after, a status shift fueled by the company's astronomical profits and employee bonuses, projected to reach up to 6.1 million RMB per person by 2027. This marks a dramatic reversal for the long-time second-place player in memory semiconductors, which has now surpassed its rival Samsung in annual operating profit. The turnaround story began in 2008 when a struggling Hynix, emerging from bankruptcy restructuring, took a risky bet by agreeing to develop High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) with AMD. At the time, HBM had no clear market beyond high-end graphics cards and was a costly, complex technology. Major players like Samsung, pursuing its own HMC technology, declined. For Hynix, with only memory as its core business, it was a gamble born of necessity. The pivotal moment came in 2012 when SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won acquired Hynix. Defying industry downturns, he invested heavily in R&D and fabrication, sustaining the HBM project through over a decade of commercial uncertainty and internal challenges. A key break occurred around 2016-2017 when Samsung faced production issues supplying HBM2 for Google's TPU, allowing SK Hynix to gain a crucial foothold in the data center market. The AI explosion post-ChatGPT in 2022 was the catalyst, turning HBM into a critical bottleneck for AI accelerators like NVIDIA's GPUs. By 2025, SK Hynix captured 62% of the global HBM market, leaving Samsung at 17%. For the first time, its annual operating profit exceeded Samsung's. Analysts point to the "innovator's dilemma" to explain Samsung's miss: its vast, successful business portfolio made it risk-averse, preventing an all-in bet on the initially niche HBM technology. In contrast, SK Hynix, as a challenger with its back against the wall, had no choice but to commit fully. The story highlights how Korea's chaebol system allows for ultra-long-term bets beyond quarterly pressures. However, SK Hynix's lead isn't guaranteed. Samsung is aggressively catching up on HBM4, and challenges like customer concentration (heavy reliance on NVIDIA) and technical hurdles in advanced packaging remain. The narrative underscores a market truth: the greatest alpha often comes from betting on uncertain, long-term directions others dismiss, much like HBM in 2008.

marsbitHá 52m

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?