Coinbase CEO Sees ‘Win-Win’ Outcome For Delayed Crypto Market Structure Bill

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-19Última atualização em 2026-02-19

Resumo

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong remains optimistic about the delayed crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act), expecting a "win-win" outcome for the industry, banks, and consumers. Despite bipartisan House approval in July 2025, the bill stalled in the Senate due to disputes, including over stablecoin rewards. Senator Bernie Moreno opposes allowing issuers to offer yields, while Armstrong argues rewards are essential for U.S. competitiveness. Armstrong notes growing bank involvement in crypto and emphasizes the need for innovation. High-level discussions continue, with the White House considering further meetings to resolve the deadlock.

The long‐awaited crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, remains stuck in the US Senate, but Coinbase Chief Executive Officer Brian Armstrong says he still expects a positive resolution.

Coinbase CEO Remains Optimistic

Speaking Wednesday on CNBC during the World Liberty Forum at Mar‐a‐Lago, Armstrong expressed confidence that lawmakers will ultimately deliver what he described as a “win‐win” outcome for the crypto industry, the banking sector, and American consumers.

“There is now a path forward,” he said, framing the legislation as an opportunity to bring regulatory certainty while strengthening the country’s position in the global digital asset race.

The legislation cleared the House of Representatives in July 2025 with a strong bipartisan vote of 294–134. It was later referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in September 2025, where it has yet to receive a floor vote.

Planned committee markups in mid‐January 2026, including sessions scheduled for January 15 and January 27, were canceled or indefinitely postponed amid industry pushback and internal disputes.

In late January and early February, the Senate Agriculture Committee advanced a related measure that included elements of the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act (S. 3755) on a narrow party‐line vote. However, that step has not resolved the broader stalemate over market structure reform.

Senator Moreno Opposes Stablecoin Rewards

One of the main sticking points continues to be stablecoin yield — whether issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest to holders. Senator Bernie Moreno has argued that such rewards should not be included in the framework.

During the CNBC interview, Moreno suggested that, unless one owns a bank, one likely should not be concerned. He contended that consumers would benefit from greater competition for their deposits.

Nonetheless, the Senator from Ohio further expressed confidence that the crypto legislation would ultimately pass the current deadlock, saying, “We are going to get this bill across the finish line,” and adding that he hopes it happens by April.

Coinbase CEO has taken a different view on stablecoins, arguing that rewards are essential to building a competitive domestic market. “To build the stablecoin industry in America, we have to have stablecoin rewards,” he said.

The executive also noted that some financial institutions are already embracing the technology, adding that the “smartest banks” are leaning into crypto and forming partnerships with Coinbase.

“It is good for the banking industry to embrace innovation,” Armstrong said, stressing that the United States has historically succeeded by adapting rather than protecting incumbents.

“America has never been one to be stagnant and protect the incumbents. We want to lean into the future and make sure America stays competitive. We are existing on a global stage here.”

Bitcoinist reported Tuesday that the White House is considering convening another meeting as soon as Thursday to address the stablecoin yield issue, signaling that high‐level efforts to break the impasse are continuing.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap currently at $2.3 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill discussed in the article and what is its current status in the US Senate?

AThe bill is called the CLARITY Act. It is currently stuck in the US Senate, having been referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and has yet to receive a floor vote.

QAccording to Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, what kind of outcome does he expect from the legislation?

ABrian Armstrong expects a 'win-win' outcome for the crypto industry, the banking sector, and American consumers, bringing regulatory certainty and strengthening the US position in the global digital asset race.

QWhat is one of the main sticking points, or disagreements, holding up the crypto market structure bill?

AOne of the main sticking points is the issue of stablecoin yield—specifically, whether issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest to holders.

QWhich US Senator is cited as being opposed to including stablecoin rewards in the bill, and what was their reasoning?

ASenator Bernie Moreno opposes including stablecoin rewards. He argued that consumers would benefit from greater competition for their deposits and suggested that unless one owns a bank, one should not be concerned with such rewards.

QWhat action is the White House reportedly considering to help break the impasse over the stablecoin issue?

AThe White House is considering convening another meeting as soon as Thursday to address the stablecoin yield issue, signaling continued high-level efforts to break the deadlock.

Leituras Relacionadas

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHá 8m

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHá 8m

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 1h

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar WIN

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de WINkLink (WIN) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar WINkLink (WIN) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu WINkLink (WIN)Depois de comprar o teu WINkLink (WIN), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona WINkLink (WIN)Transaciona facilmente WINkLink (WIN) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

420 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar WIN

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de WIN (WIN) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片