The era of the 'Wild West' for crypto assets is officially over.
On March 17, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jointly released an interpretive document numbered 33-11412. This 68-page regulatory framework officially marks the end of a decade-long era of 'regulation by enforcement' for U.S. crypto oversight, ushering in a new epoch of clarity and harmony driven by "Project Crypto".
This document is not only a rare product of regulatory collaboration between the SEC and CFTC but also the most landmark guidance in the history of U.S. crypto regulation. Below is the full essential interpretation:
I. Background: "Project Crypto" - From Conflict to Collaboration
In 2017, the SEC first applied the Howey Test to crypto assets through "The DAO Report." For the following decade, regulation primarily relied on enforcement actions to define asset attributes, leaving the market in a prolonged state of uncertainty and controversy.
In early 2025, the SEC established the "Crypto Task Force," subsequently launching the "Project Crypto" initiative, co-led by SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins and CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig. The initiative aimed to coordinate the mandates of the two regulatory bodies, establish a unified asset classification methodology, and provide a clear path for crypto innovation to remain in the U.S. In January 2026, the project was officially upgraded to a joint SEC-CFTC operation.
II. Asset Classification: The "Five-Category" Logic for Crypto Assets
Based on asset characteristics, use cases, and functionality, the document divides crypto assets into five major categories, providing the market with a clear classification standard for the first time:
-
Digital Commodities
Definition: Assets whose value derives from the programmed operation and supply-demand dynamics of a "functional" crypto system, not from the managerial efforts of others.
Core List: The document explicitly names mainstream tokens such as BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, DOT, AVAX, LINK, etc., as digital commodities. These assets are not controlled by any single centralized entity and do not possess economic rights that generate passive income.
-
Digital Securities
Definition: "Tokenized securities," referring to traditional securities represented in the form of crypto assets, or digital assets possessing the economic substance of securities (e.g., representing corporate ownership, dividend rights).
Regulation: Regardless of whether on-chain or off-chain, as long as the economic substance is met, they fall under SEC jurisdiction.
-
Regulated Payment Stablecoins
Definition: Stablecoins that meet the definition of the 2025 "GENIUS Act" and are issued by authorized institutions.
Classification: These stablecoins are explicitly excluded from the definition of "securities" and are primarily constrained as payment instruments under specific legislation.
-
Digital Tools
Use: Tokens with utility functions (e.g., access rights or service payments) only within specific crypto systems, typically not considered securities.
-
Digital Collectibles
Definition: Assets intended to be collected and/or used, representing items such as artwork, music, videos, in-game items, or internet memes.
Examples: CryptoPunks, Chromie Squiggles, WIF, VCOIN, etc.
Classification: Not securities themselves; value derives from supply and demand, not the managerial efforts of others. However, if fractionalized and sold, they may constitute securities.
III. Innovation: "Separation" and "Dynamic Conversion" of Security Attributes
This is the document's most groundbreaking legal innovation—the SEC acknowledges for the first time that the "security attribute" of a crypto asset is not permanent.
"Separation" Mechanism
-
Principle: A project in its early financing stages might be considered a security (investment contract) if it meets the Howey Test. However, once the project completes its roadmap, achieves autonomous operation of open-source code, and decentralizes network power, the asset can be "separated" from the investment contract.
-
Judgment Standard: When investors no longer reasonably rely on the "essential managerial efforts" of the issuer for profits, but instead rely on the system's own operation and market supply and demand, the asset transitions from a "security" to a "digital commodity."
-
Separation Timing: Can occur immediately upon delivery of the asset to the purchaser or at a future date.
Three Scenarios for Separation
-
Issuer Fulfills Promises: After completing essential managerial efforts, even if non-essential maintenance continues, the asset is no longer bound by the investment contract.
-
Issuer Abandons Project: If development is publicly abandoned and promises are no longer fulfilled, the asset falls outside securities law jurisdiction (though the issuer may still face legal liability for fraud).
-
Secondary Market Trading: If subsequent purchasers no longer reasonably expect to rely on the issuer's efforts for profit, the transaction does not constitute a securities transaction.
Transparency Recommendation
The SEC encourages project teams to publicly disclose roadmap progress and milestone achievements to help the market identify the "point of separation."
IV. Qualification of On-Chain Activities: "Demining" Decentralization
The document provides extremely detailed and favorable interpretations of long-debated activities like staking, mining, wrapping, and airdrops:
Protocol Mining
-
Qualification: PoW mining is an "administrative or ministerial" activity that secures the network and validates transactions.
-
Conclusion: Whether solo mining or joining a mining pool, it does not involve securities issuance.
-
Pool Operation: The activities of pool operators are administrative and do not constitute essential managerial efforts.
Protocol Staking
-
Qualification: Staking is an administrative activity for maintaining network operation.
-
Coverage: Includes solo staking, delegated third-party staking, custodial staking, liquid staking.
-
Custodial Staking: If a custodian stakes on behalf of users, and it does not involve re-lending, leveraging, or discretionary trading of assets, it does not constitute a securities activity.
-
Ancillary Services: Auxiliary services like slash insurance, early unstaking, flexible reward distribution, and asset aggregation are all considered administrative tasks.
Staking Receipt Tokens
-
Qualification: If the underlying asset is a non-security commodity and not subject to an investment contract, the receipt token itself is not a security.
-
Principle: The receipt merely acts as a "receipt"; it does not generate yield—yield originates from the underlying staking activity.
Wrapping Tokens
-
Definition: Users deposit crypto assets with a custodian or cross-chain bridge to obtain 1:1 pegged, redeemable wrapped tokens.
-
Qualification: If the underlying asset is a non-security commodity and not subject to an investment contract, wrapping is an "administrative function" aimed at enhancing interoperability and does not constitute a securities transaction.
-
Key Restriction: The custodian must lock the assets and cannot lend, collateralize, or re-stake them.
Airdrops
-
Qualification Breakthrough: As long as the recipient does not provide money, goods, services, or other consideration, it does not meet the "investment of money" element of the Howey Test.
-
Applicable Scenarios:
-
Airdropping to wallets holding a specific token, without prior announcement.
-
Rewarding early testnet users.
-
Airdropping to eligible users based on application usage.
-
Red Line: If recipients need to provide services (e.g., social media promotion) in exchange for the airdrop, it may constitute a securities offering.
V. Consolidation of U.S. Leadership
The document details its economic significance at the end:
-
Eliminate "Chilling Effect": By providing legal clarity, it reduces business stagnation caused by opaque compliance and encourages crypto innovation to return to the U.S.
-
Reduce Compliance Costs: Clear classification and separation paths significantly lower legal consulting and regulatory response costs for enterprises.
-
Enhance Market Transparency: The new framework requires more detailed disclosure during the "investment contract" stage, better protecting investors.
-
Promote Competition and Innovation: Clear rules will attract more issuers and entrepreneurs to the market.
-
Improve Pricing Efficiency: Reduce price distortions caused by uncertainty.
VI. Historic Breakthrough in Regulatory Collaboration
Structurally, the document establishes a clear analytical path: first classify the asset, then judge the transaction structure, and finally analyze whether the investment relationship continues to exist.
More importantly, this is a rare instance of coordination between the SEC and CFTC on crypto regulatory issues. Previously, the two agencies had long-standing disagreements over the "security vs. commodity" definition. This joint framework essentially provides a preliminary division for the归属 (guīshǔ -归属) of major asset categories, marking a shift in U.S. crypto regulation from the stage of "inter-agency jurisdictional competition" to a "division of labor system based on unified rules."
This 68-page document not only ends a decade of regulatory chaos but also establishes U.S. leadership in the global crypto regulatory landscape. For practitioners, it is a must-read "industry constitution"; for investors, it is a clear "rights protection guide"; for entrepreneurs, it is a definitive "compliance roadmap".
The era of the 'Wild West' for crypto assets is officially over.
Twitter：https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN
Bitpush TG Discussion Group：https://t.me/BitPushCommunity
Bitpush TG Subscription： https://t.me/bitpush
