Ripple expands European footprint with AMINA stablecoin payment partnership

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-12Última atualização em 2025-12-12

Resumo

Ripple Payments has partnered with Swiss bank AMINA to provide its payment infrastructure, enabling more efficient, faster, and lower-cost transactions using the Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin. This collaboration strengthens Ripple’s presence in Europe, leveraging AMINA’s regulatory standing under Swiss and EU frameworks. The partnership addresses friction faced by crypto-native businesses in traditional banking, particularly in cross-border stablecoin transactions. Ripple aims to bridge fiat and blockchain systems, supporting seamless payments. This move is part of Ripple’s broader strategy to integrate blockchain into traditional finance, following recent expansions in Asia-Pacific and regulatory approvals in Singapore and Abu Dhabi for RLUSD.

The payments subsidiary of blockchain services company Ripple has partnered with Swiss bank Amina to provide it with access to its payment infrastructure.

According to a Friday Ripple Payments announcement, the company will allow Amina to “settle transactions more efficiently without relying on traditional payment infrastructure, making transactions faster, lower cost, and with increased reliability and transparency.” This builds on a previous relationship between the companies, with the bank’s integration of the Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin happening back in July.

The move also reinforces Ripple’s presence in Europe, with Amina being a Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority-regulated financial institution. The bank’s Austrian subsidiary also holds a license under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) granted by Austria’s Financial Market Authority in October.

Amina chief product officer Myles Harrison said “native web3 businesses often run into friction when working with legacy banking systems,” adding that stablecoins can help solve those issues. “This is particularly the case for cross-border stablecoin transactions which traditional banks are yet to widely adopt.”

Related: Community expects first US spot XRP ETF to launch on Thursday

Banks need crypto services for crypto companies

Harrison explained that the bank’s clients “need payment infrastructure that can handle both fiat and stablecoin rails simultaneously,” which traditional banking networks cannot provide for. Ripple Payments, on the other hand, allowed Amina to offer such services, which led to “reducing cross-border friction and helping our crypto-native clients maintain their competitive edge.”

Ripple’s managing director for the United Kingdom and Europe Cassie Craddock said that the collaboration lets Amina “serve as the on-ramp for digital asset innovators into traditional financial infrastructure.” He added that Ripple Payments provides a “bridge between fiat and blockchain” that enables seamless stablecoin payments.

Related: Canary Capital filing signals spot XRP ETF set for launch this week

Ripple onboards traditional finance onchain

This is just the latest partnership in which Ripple injected blockchain capabilities into an institution engaged in traditional finance. According to mid-November reports, the company is spending about $4 billion to combine prime trading, treasury tools, payments, and custody to take on traditional finance.

Ripple’s ambitions are also global. Earlier this month, Ripple Labs received approval from Singapore’s central bank to expand its payment activities. This enables the company to offer regulated token services, end-to-end payments and growth across Asia-Pacific.

At the end of November, RLUSD was also cleared for use by institutions in Abu Dhabi after winning recognition as an Accepted Fiat-Referenced Token by the local watchdog.

Leituras Relacionadas

World Cup Approaches, Prediction Markets Face a Major Test

The 2026 FIFA World Cup represents a major public test for sports prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi, which have grown significantly by offering tradable markets on event outcomes. This global event, hosted by the US, Canada, and Mexico, concentrates risks related to sports integrity, cross-border operations, and gambling ecosystems. A key concern is the potential for insider trading on non-public information (e.g., injuries, lineups), which could be exploited in granular prediction markets. FIFA's choice of its official prediction market partner, ADI Predictstreet, has raised significant doubts. The platform, relatively unknown, has faced scrutiny over the integrity of its executives—including past insider trading allegations and associations with a major EU corruption scandal—its rapid licensing in Gibraltar, and the fact its product was not yet live at the time of the announcement. This partnership begins with a "trust deficit." FIFA itself carries historical corruption baggage, and its deepening ties with betting and data industries fuel concerns about maintaining sporting integrity. While FIFA has established monitoring systems, their effectiveness against potential insider trading across decentralized global prediction markets remains unproven. Major US-based prediction platforms have updated rules to prohibit trading based on confidential information. However, the World Cup's complex ecosystem of federations, teams, and officials makes enforcement far more challenging than in domestic leagues. The event will not determine the fate of prediction markets but will critically test whether they can be integrated as a regulated event-trading infrastructure or remain a high-risk gambling-adjacent activity within global sports.

marsbitHá 1h

World Cup Approaches, Prediction Markets Face a Major Test

marsbitHá 1h

CLARITY Act Passes Crucial Hurdle, But a Long Road Remains Ahead

The CLARITY Act, a major U.S. digital asset market structure bill, has advanced from the Senate Banking Committee with a 15-9 bipartisan vote, ending a four-month legislative standstill. The bill's core aim is to resolve the long-standing jurisdictional conflict between the SEC and CFTC by clearly defining which digital assets are securities or commodities. It also establishes rules for exchanges and custodians while providing protections for non-custodial software developers and blockchain validators, shielding them from being classified as money transmitters. The committee's approval triggered a positive market reaction, with Bitcoin rising and crypto-related stocks outperforming the broader market. However, the passage was secured only after last-minute negotiations and compromises, including the addition of amendments on investor protection, bank activities, and defining "truly decentralized" DeFi projects. Two key Democratic senators provided the crucial swing votes but cautioned that their future support in a full Senate vote is not guaranteed. Significant hurdles remain. The bill must still pass the full Senate, requiring 60 votes, and a major point of contention is a Democratic demand for an ethics clause restricting financial ties between high-level government officials and crypto firms—a provision opposed by Republicans and the White House. Additionally, the bill must be reconciled with a version from the Senate Agriculture Committee. If not passed before the August congressional recess, the next viable legislative window might not open until 2030. The legislation also faced, and ultimately withstood, last-minute lobbying opposition from traditional banking groups concerned about deposit outflows to crypto. If ultimately enacted, the CLARITY Act would initiate a multi-year rulemaking process, with new regulations likely not taking full effect until 2027 or later. While a critical milestone, the path to becoming law remains a challenging race against time.

链捕手Há 1h

CLARITY Act Passes Crucial Hurdle, But a Long Road Remains Ahead

链捕手Há 1h

Popular Interactive Collection | The Beacon Season 1 Pre-registration; GenLayer Latest Testnet Interaction (May 15th)

This article from Odaily introduces three recent interactive opportunities in the crypto/blockchain space. First, **The Beacon**, a fantasy action RPG backed by Arbitrum, has opened pre-registration for its Season 1 starting May 25th. With a prize pool of 7.7 million BCN tokens, this is presented as a final chance to earn BCN before its Token Generation Event (TGE). Second, **GenLayer**, an AI-native blockchain platform, has launched a testnet for its FUD Markets project. The tutorial guides users through signing in, obtaining test USDC on Base Sepolia, making a test trade, sharing their experience on X, and submitting the post to GenLayer's portal for potential rewards. Finally, **Seismic**, an EVM-compatible privacy-focused L1, has launched its testnet. The guide explains how to claim test tokens (requiring social verification), deploy a contract, and join the official Discord community to aim for early contributor status. All three projects represent active testnet or pre-launch phases where users can interact for potential future airdrops or rewards.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Popular Interactive Collection | The Beacon Season 1 Pre-registration; GenLayer Latest Testnet Interaction (May 15th)

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

A Century Before Swift and Blockchain, China Built Its Own Cross-Border Financial Network

A century before Swift and blockchain, China's cross-border financial miracle: The Qiaopi Network. Driven by the phrase "a promise is greater than life," the Qiaopi (overseas Chinese remittance letter) system was a remarkable, entirely private financial network. Operating for over a hundred years until 1979, it facilitated billions in remittances, at one point constituting over 50% of China's foreign exchange during WWII—all without central banks, official clearing, or government backing. It began with "Shuike" (water guests), couriers who carried cash and letters personally between Southeast Asia and Chinese villages like Chaozhou. Their operation was peer-to-peer, identity-verified through kinship, and had a near-zero default rate, as trust was their sole collateral. This evolved into "Piju" (remittance houses), creating an institutional network. They ingeniously used currencies like the Hong Kong Dollar for settlement and practiced netting clearance, offsetting remittance flows against trade payments to minimize physical cash movement. Its resilience shone in wartime. When Japanese forces cut off main routes, the network forged an underground "Dongxing Remittance Path" through Vietnam. It used coded messages ("a bag of rice" for a sum of silver) to evade interception, reliably delivering funds critical for survival and even clandestine support for the war effort. Unlike Swift (built on state cooperation) or blockchain (relying on cryptography), Qiaopi was founded on clan,乡土 (native place), and human trust—a cultural consensus where违约 meant social death. Modern finance compensates for this lost trust with complex collateral and regulation. The Qiaopi network, powered only by sailing ships, familiar accents, and profound integrity, achieved a feat of decentralized, cross-border finance that remains unparalleled—a poignant story of信用 (trust/credit) in its purest form.

marsbitHá 2h

A Century Before Swift and Blockchain, China Built Its Own Cross-Border Financial Network

marsbitHá 2h

Bitcoin Is Only One Leg From Hitting A Bottom, But How Low Can It Go?

Crypto analyst Bee forecasts a major Bitcoin price bottom is imminent. Despite a recent rally above $83,000, Bee contends BTC remains in a broader bear market, viewing the gains as a temporary bounce within a long-term descending channel. The analysis shows BTC forming lower highs and lower lows since its October 2025 all-time high above $126,200. Following a recent rejection around $83,000, which is marked as another lower high, Bee predicts Bitcoin's price could decline to approximately $43,035, representing a drop of over 45%. The analyst notes that typical bear market cycles last 365 days, and with the current cycle only on day 217, more downside is expected. Only after this final bottom is formed does Bee anticipate a sustained recovery, projecting a potential rally back to $100,000 by 2027.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Bitcoin Is Only One Leg From Hitting A Bottom, But How Low Can It Go?