Popular Interactive Collection | The Beacon Season 1 Pre-registration; GenLayer Latest Testnet Interaction (May 15th)

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-05-15Última atualização em 2026-05-15

Resumo

This article from Odaily introduces three recent interactive opportunities in the crypto/blockchain space. First, **The Beacon**, a fantasy action RPG backed by Arbitrum, has opened pre-registration for its Season 1 starting May 25th. With a prize pool of 7.7 million BCN tokens, this is presented as a final chance to earn BCN before its Token Generation Event (TGE). Second, **GenLayer**, an AI-native blockchain platform, has launched a testnet for its FUD Markets project. The tutorial guides users through signing in, obtaining test USDC on Base Sepolia, making a test trade, sharing their experience on X, and submitting the post to GenLayer's portal for potential rewards. Finally, **Seismic**, an EVM-compatible privacy-focused L1, has launched its testnet. The guide explains how to claim test tokens (requiring social verification), deploy a contract, and join the official Discord community to aim for early contributor status. All three projects represent active testnet or pre-launch phases where users can interact for potential future airdrops or rewards.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Asher (@Asher_0210)

The Beacon: Fantasy Action Blockchain Game

Project Introduction

The Beacon, incubated by TreasureDAO, is a fantasy action RPG that blends Roughlite elements and is funded by the Arbitrum Foundation. In The Beacon, players choose a basic weapon to enter dungeons for exploration, where they can upgrade their weapons for better combat. Dungeons are procedurally generated, ensuring a different experience each time.

This week, The Beacon announced on platform X that Season 1 will launch on May 25th, and pre-registration is now open. Additionally, the total prize pool for Season 1 is 7.7 million BCN tokens. The Beacon also stated this is the final opportunity to earn BCN tokens before TGE.

Interaction Tutorial

Go to the website (Link: https://app.thebeacon.gg/pre-register) to complete the pre-registration for the Season 1 event.

Furthermore, inviting friends can earn you extra rewards.

GenLayer: AI-Native Blockchain Platform

Project Introduction

GenLayer is an AI-native blockchain platform designed to overcome the limitations of traditional smart contracts. The platform employs an Optimistic Democracy consensus, consisting of validator nodes running different AI models (LLMs). Consensus on subjective decisions is achieved through majority voting and an appeals mechanism, functioning as an on-chain "synthetic judicial system."

On August 20, 2024, GenLayer announced the completion of a $7.5 million seed funding round, led by North Island Ventures, with participation from Node Capital, Arrington Capital, and others.

On May 13th, its ecosystem project FUD Markets launched on the testnet, allowing users to participate and earn points through interaction.

Interaction Tutorial

STEP 1. Go to the website (Link: https://fud.markets/), click "Sign in" to log in to your account.

STEP 2. Claim test tokens (Link: https://faucet.circle.com/), enter the address generated upon registration, select the Base Sepolia network, and claim 20 USDC test tokens.

STEP 3. Return to the FUD Markets website to complete transaction confirmation.

STEP 4. Choose any token and complete an order placement operation.

STEP 5. Quote this official X post (Link: https://x.com/FUDmarkets/status/2054584001562562986?s=20) and share your trading experience.

STEP 6. Go to the GenLayer portal website (Link: https://portal.genlayer.foundation/#/community/contributions), select "Community," then click "Contributions," and finally choose "FUD Market Testnet Special Quest" to submit your experience tweet.

Seismic: Privacy-Focused L1 Project

Project Introduction

Seismic is an L1 project in the privacy sector, providing an EVM-compatible privacy solution through Intel TDX Trusted Execution Environment for protocol-level encryption. To date, Seismic has completed two funding rounds this year, totaling $17 million:

  • On March 6, 2025, Seismic announced the completion of a $7 million funding round led by a16z Crypto, with participation from Polychain, 1kx, NGC, and dao5.
  • On November 12, 2025, Seismic announced the completion of a $10 million funding round led by a16z crypto, with participation from Polychain, Amber Group, TrueBridge, dao5, and LayerZero.

On May 13th, Seismic announced that its testnet is officially live.

Interaction Tutorial

STEP 1. Claim test tokens (Link: https://faucet.seismictest.net/). Verification via X (50+ followers) or GitHub (10+ followers) is required. You can claim 10 sUSDC or 0.5 ETH every 24 hours.

STEP 2. Deploy a contract (Link: https://www.onchaindaily.io/), connect your wallet, and switch to the Seismic Devnet.

STEP 3. Join the official Discord (Link: https://discord.gg/seismic), stay active in the community, and strive to obtain early access roles.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is The Beacon, and what significant event is happening on May 25th?

AThe Beacon is a fantasy action RPG incubated by TreasureDAO and funded by the Arbitrum Foundation. It features roguelike elements with procedurally generated dungeons. On May 25th, The Beacon is launching its Season 1 event, which is now open for pre-registration, offering a total prize pool of 7.7 million BCN tokens.

QWhat is the core innovation of the GenLayer platform, and what is its FUD Markets project?

AGenLayer is an AI-native blockchain platform that aims to overcome the limitations of traditional smart contracts. Its core innovation is the Optimistic Democracy consensus, which uses a network of validator nodes running different AI models (LLMs) to reach consensus on subjective decisions through majority voting and appeal mechanisms, essentially creating an on-chain 'synthetic judicial system'. FUD Markets is an ecosystem project on GenLayer's testnet where users can interact to earn points.

QWhat is Seismic, and what technology does it use to provide its privacy solution?

ASeismic is a privacy-focused Layer 1 blockchain project. It provides an EVM-compatible privacy solution by leveraging Intel TDX (Trusted Domain Extensions) technology at the protocol layer to create a trusted execution environment for encryption.

QAccording to the article, what are the steps to participate in the FUD Markets testnet interaction?

AThe steps are: 1) Sign in to the FUD Markets website. 2) Claim test tokens (20 USDC) on the Base Sepolia network via the provided faucet. 3) Return to FUD Markets and confirm a transaction. 4) Place an order (open a position) for any token. 5) Quote the official FUD Markets tweet and share your trading experience. 6) Submit your tweet link in the 'FUD Market Testnet Special Quest' section on the GenLayer portal website.

QWhat is the total funding amount raised by Seismic in 2025, as mentioned in the article, and who were the lead investors?

ASeismic raised a total of $17 million across two funding rounds in 2025. The first round in March was $7 million led by a16z Crypto. The second round in November was $10 million, also led by a16z crypto.

Leituras Relacionadas

UK FCA unveils crypto rulebook: Risk-based approach starts October 2027

UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has unveiled a new, risk-based regulatory framework for cryptoasset companies, set to take effect in October 2027. This approach moves away from rigid, uniform rules to a system where capital requirements and disclosure obligations will vary based on a firm's individual risk profile. Companies will conduct their own annual risk assessments and stress tests, subject to FCA review. The rules aim to lower compliance costs for smaller firms, boost market confidence, and attract millions of new UK crypto users. The framework also establishes baseline rules for stablecoin issuers, including consumer protections, while allowing for stricter oversight of larger, systemic players. FCA executives state the rules provide needed clarity, though experts caution that regulation reduces but does not eliminate consumer risks.

ambcryptoHá 8m

UK FCA unveils crypto rulebook: Risk-based approach starts October 2027

ambcryptoHá 8m

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbitHá 12m

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbitHá 12m

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbitHá 37m

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbitHá 37m

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbitHá 41m

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbitHá 41m

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbitHá 1h

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow