OpenAI Restarts Robotics Business After Six Years, Short-term Bets on Assistive Robots

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-02Última atualização em 2026-06-02

Resumo

On June 1st, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company's entry into the physical robotics arena, launching a new "OpenAI Robotics" team. The strategy has short and long-term goals: developing robots to assist technical workers with infrastructure in the near term, and envisioning personal robots for everyone eventually. This marks a return to robotics for OpenAI, which had a team from 2016-2019 before disbanding it to focus on large language models like GPT, leading to ChatGPT. The revival stems from the rapid progress of an internal "Worldsim" research project, now led by Sora co-creator Aditya Ramesh, and a shift in strategy following the end of a partnership with humanoid robotics firm Figure AI in early 2025 due to technical disagreements. OpenAI's approach leverages its leading AI models and "world model" capabilities, aiming to build the "brain" first before the physical body. The move also serves to present a new growth narrative—embodied AI and expansion into the physical world—ahead of its planned 2026 IPO, potentially helping to address investor concerns over its significant ongoing losses.

On June 1, a recruitment post shared by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on social media officially announced the company's entry into the physical robotics track. Altman stated that the company is forming a new team named "OpenAI Robotics" and is publicly recruiting full-stack hardware, operations, systems, and machine learning engineers. The goal is to "co-program and build robots that are truly useful to society."

According to Altman's explanation, OpenAI's robotics strategy has both short-term and long-term goals. In the short term, OpenAI focuses on developing robots that can assist technical workers in building future infrastructure. In the long run, the company envisions a future where every person can own a personal robot capable of fulfilling various needs.

Altman revealed that the move into robotics is based on the rapid development of an internal OpenAI research project called "Worldsim." This project evolved over the past year into OpenAI Robotics, led by the company's Research Vice President, Aditya Ramesh, a core developer of the text-to-image model DALL·E and the video generation model Sora. The project's foundation lies in the deep integration and co-design of robotics hardware research and machine learning research.

OpenAI's return to the robotics field is, in fact, a "comeback." As early as the company's founding days, robotics technology was a crucial direction in its exploration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Between 2016 and 2019, OpenAI successively launched the reinforcement learning benchmark environment OpenAI Gym, the open-source robot simulation platform Roboschool, and successfully developed a dexterous robotic hand named Dactyl.

In 2019, OpenAI, using reinforcement learning and "Automatic Domain Randomization" (ADR) technology, trained an AI system that enabled a humanoid robotic hand to successfully solve a Rubik's Cube. This research proved the feasibility of the technical path of training in a simulation environment and then transferring the capabilities to a real robot. However, due to the scarcity of robotics training data and slow iteration at that time, contrasted with the vast and easily accessible text and image data on the internet, OpenAI made a strategic decision around 2020: to disband the robotics team and concentrate resources on the development of large language models represented by the GPT series. This decision ultimately led to the creation of ChatGPT.

In the following years, OpenAI ignited the global large model boom with its ChatGPT series of products, becoming the world's highest-valued AI unicorn. According to multiple media reports, OpenAI secretly submitted a draft IPO prospectus on May 22, planning to go public as early as September 2026. In its latest round of financing completed in March of this year, OpenAI's valuation reached $852 billion. Institutions like Deutsche Bank predict its listing valuation could exceed $1 trillion, with a fundraising scale potentially reaching $60 billion, potentially making it one of the largest tech IPOs in U.S. public market history.

Nevertheless, OpenAI also faces significant pressure from substantial losses. The company is projected to incur a full-year loss of approximately $14 billion in 2026, with cash burn expected to further expand. It might not achieve cash flow break-even until 2030 at the earliest. Its gross margin is only about 33%, with the high inference costs of AI models being the primary reason for eroding profits.

During the years after disbanding its in-house robotics team, OpenAI did not completely abandon the robotics track. Instead, it adopted a "multi-point investment" strategy through its venture fund, successively investing in several robotics startups, including the Norwegian humanoid robot company 1X Technologies, the American humanoid robot star company Figure AI, and Physical Intelligence.

The most notable collaboration was with Figure AI in February 2024. At that time, OpenAI not only participated in Figure AI's $675 million Series B funding round but also announced the development of a dedicated multimodal AI model for Figure's humanoid robots. Just 13 days after the partnership was announced, the Figure 01 humanoid robot equipped with the OpenAI model demonstrated fluent natural language interaction, object recognition, and autonomous operation capabilities.

However, this collaboration lasted less than a year. In February 2025, Figure AI founder Brett Adcock officially announced the termination of the partnership with OpenAI, opting to independently develop an end-to-end robot AI model. The primary reason for the breakdown was a divergence in technical approaches. Figure believed that general-purpose large models could not adapt to the hardware requirements of robots; it was essential to create a vertically integrated end-to-end model. This also prompted OpenAI, after a six-year hiatus, to choose to "revive" its robotics team, personally entering the field and upgrading robotics from an "investment" to an "internal strategic business."

Simultaneously, this is also OpenAI's move to outline a new growth narrative for the capital market ahead of its IPO. It aims to show investors a grand vision of transitioning from pure software to a software-hardware combination and expanding from the virtual world to the physical world. The company hopes to use the "embodied intelligence" story to hedge against market concerns about the sustainability of its business model and its massive losses.

OpenAI's advantage in entering the robotics field lies in its globally leading AI large model capabilities, particularly its "world model" for understanding and simulating the physical world. Its technical path may differ from many companies starting with hardware platforms, instead following a logic of "first build the brain, then grow the body." This means first enabling the AI to understand physical laws through a powerful world model, then infusing that capability into physical robots. If successful, this software- and algorithm-defined hardware approach could reshape the R&D model of the robotics industry.

This article is from "Jiemian News," author: Li Kefeng

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy is OpenAI restarting its robotics business after six years?

AOpenAI is restarting its robotics business primarily due to the rapid development of its internal 'Worldsim' research project, which evolved into 'OpenAI Robotics'. Additionally, a strategic partnership breakdown with Figure AI over technical disagreements on AI model integration for robots prompted the company to bring robotics back as an in-house strategic business, moving beyond mere investment.

QWhat are the short-term and long-term goals for OpenAI's new robotics strategy?

AOpenAI's short-term goal is to develop robots capable of assisting technical workers in building future infrastructure. Its long-term vision is to create personal robots for everyone that can fulfill various needs.

QWhat was the outcome and significance of OpenAI's Dactyl robotic hand research in 2019?

AIn 2019, OpenAI successfully trained an AI system to solve a Rubik's Cube using a Dactyl robotic hand. This research demonstrated the feasibility of training AI in simulation and transferring that capability to a real-world robot, proving a key technical pathway.

QHow did OpenAI's collaboration with Figure AI in 2024 proceed and end?

AIn February 2024, OpenAI invested in Figure AI's funding round and developed a multimodal AI model for its humanoid robot. The integrated robot demonstrated impressive capabilities within 13 days. However, the partnership ended in February 2025 when Figure AI decided to build its own end-to-end AI model, citing that general-purpose large models couldn't adequately meet specific robot hardware requirements.

QWhat is OpenAI's potential approach to developing robots, according to the article?

AOpenAI's potential approach is described as 'building the brain first, then the body.' This means focusing first on developing a powerful 'world model' AI that understands physical laws, and then instilling that capability into physical robots. This software and algorithm-first approach could potentially reshape robotics R&D.

Leituras Relacionadas

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHá 5m

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHá 5m

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

Blockchain Finds Its True Path After 18 Years: Becoming the Financial Backbone for AI Agents and Autonomy This analysis explores a pivotal shift in the blockchain and crypto investment landscape, driven by the dominance of AI. Major venture capital firms, including Variant, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, and YZi Labs, are moving beyond pure "crypto" investment theses. They are expanding their focus to AI, robotics, and frontier tech, signaling that blockchain is no longer seen as a standalone sector but as an underlying infrastructure layer. The core argument is that blockchain's killer application may not be user-facing apps, but rather providing the economic rails for the coming wave of AI agents, autonomous robots, and automated systems. Key capabilities like self-custody wallets, programmable stablecoins for micropayments, on-chain identity, and verifiable smart contracts are positioned as essential for a future where machines conduct economic activity. The recent $1.4 billion investment by Tether (via its venture arm) in German robotics company NEURA Robotics exemplifies this, aiming to embed Tether's wallet tools directly into robots for autonomous transactions. While many "AI + Crypto" projects remain superficial, the article concludes that true value lies where crypto is a necessary component—enabling machine-to-machine payments, agent autonomy, verifiable data provenance, and open financial settlement for the AI era. For crypto venture capital, this convergence with AI represents both an adaptation to shifting capital flows and a potential path to unlocking the large-scale, non-speculative utility the industry has long sought.

marsbitHá 25m

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

marsbitHá 25m

Blockchain has finally begun sailing toward the main channel after 18 years

After 18 years of development, blockchain technology is beginning to move from a specialized niche into mainstream adoption, according to a recent industry analysis. The shift is reflected in the changing strategies of major crypto venture capital firms, which are expanding their focus beyond pure "digital ownership" towards broader themes like "autonomy." The report highlights that leading VC firms like Variant, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, and YZi Labs are broadening their investment mandates to include not only crypto but also artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, biotech, and other frontier technologies. This reflects a recognition that the isolated "crypto investment" narrative is losing appeal to limited partners (LPs) as capital and attention increasingly flow toward AI and other high-growth tech sectors. A key emerging thesis is that blockchain's most significant future application may not be as a consumer-facing product, but as the underlying economic and settlement infrastructure for the AI era. As AI agents and autonomous systems become more prevalent, they will require programmable, global, and low-cost payment networks (like stablecoins), verifiable digital identities, and secure wallets to manage transactions and assets on behalf of users. The investment by stablecoin issuer Tether into robotics company NEURA, with plans to integrate its wallet technology, is cited as a prime example of this convergence. However, the article cautions that simply labeling projects as "AI + Crypto" is insufficient. True value lies in integrations where blockchain technology is essential—such as enabling machine-to-machine micropayments, verifiable data provenance for AI, or transparent governance for autonomous organizations—rather than being a superficial marketing add-on. In conclusion, while AI currently dominates the tech narrative and capital flows, it may ultimately create the real-world, high-frequency demand that the crypto industry has long sought. For crypto VCs and projects, the path forward is to position blockchain not as a competing sector, but as a critical foundational layer powering autonomy and economic activity in an AI-driven future.

链捕手Há 32m

Blockchain has finally begun sailing toward the main channel after 18 years

链捕手Há 32m

Y Combinator Co-founder: How to Make a Billion Dollars?

The Y Combinator co-founder argues that becoming a billionaire by founding a successful startup is not only possible but demonstrably achievable without unfair or unethical practices. He disputes a politician's claim to the contrary, using the example of a founder whose company grew at 93% monthly solely through creating a product users loved and recommended. The core mechanism is exponential growth. A conservative 15% monthly growth rate compounds to a 4384x increase over five years, which can easily lead to billion-dollar valuations and founder wealth. The process depends on two key variables: the growth rate and the duration it can be sustained. A high growth rate stems from a great product that users naturally promote, while a long duration requires a large enough market. For aspiring founders, especially young ones, the simplest path is to build something they and their friends genuinely need. Young people's current needs often predict future mass-market trends. He advises against actively "searching" for ideas, as this tends to filter out unconventional but promising ones. Instead, inspiration should come from working on interesting projects with friends, as many iconic companies (e.g., Apple, Facebook) started this way. Ultimately, building a massively valuable startup is not about exploitation but empathy: deeply understanding a user group and building a product that significantly improves their lives. This, powered by exponential growth in a large market, is the legitimate path to immense wealth creation.

Foresight NewsHá 34m

Y Combinator Co-founder: How to Make a Billion Dollars?

Foresight NewsHá 34m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片