2026-04-22 Quarta

Centro de Notícias - Página 77

Obtém notícias cripto em tempo real e tendências de mercado com o Centro de Notícias da HTX.

Running Gemma 4 Locally on iPhone Goes Viral: How Far Are We from the Zero Token Era?

Google's newly open-sourced Gemma 4 model, built on the same architecture as Gemini 3, has gained significant attention for its ability to run locally on mobile devices like the iPhone and Samsung Galaxy. With smaller versions such as E2B (2.3B parameters) and E4B (4.5B parameters), it supports native multimodal capabilities and offers a 128K context window. Users report impressive speeds—over 40 tokens per second on Apple chips with MLX optimization—making it feel "like magic." The model is accessible via Google’s official AI Edge Gallery app, ensuring ease of use and security. While Gemma 4 excels in tasks like text generation, coding, and image understanding, it struggles with more complex agent-based workflows, such as tool calling and structured outputs, where models like Qwen3-coder perform better. Despite some limitations in reasoning, Gemma 4’s local performance hints at a future where everyday AI tasks—chat, coding, reasoning—can be handled offline, reducing reliance on cloud-based token services. Although cloud models still lead in advanced reasoning and large-scale multi-agent tasks, the trend suggests that as hardware and quantization improve, on-device models will increasingly handle high-frequency simple tasks. This shift could disrupt the AI industry’s reliance on token sales and API subscriptions, pushing providers to focus on more complex, data-intensive capabilities. Gemma 4 is just the beginning of this transformation.

marsbit04/06 05:53

Running Gemma 4 Locally on iPhone Goes Viral: How Far Are We from the Zero Token Era?

marsbit04/06 05:53

Data Research: How Big Is the Liquidity Gap Between Hyperliquid and CME Crude Oil?

This analysis compares the liquidity and market structure of Hyperliquid's xyz:CL perpetual crude oil contract with CME's CLJ6 futures contract over a three-week period from late February to mid-March 2026. Key findings reveal a significant liquidity gap: Hyperliquid's average depth is less than 1% of CME's, with a 125x difference at the ±2 bps level. The median trade size on Hyperliquid ($543) is 166x smaller than on CME ($90,450), reflecting its crypto-native retail user base. For a $1M order, estimated slippage on Hyperliquid (15.4 bps) is approximately 20x higher than on CME (0.79 bps), indicating it currently lacks the capacity for institutional-sized orders. However, a notable trend emerged during weekends when CME is closed. Hyperliquid's weekend trading volume grew significantly over the three observed weekends, from $31M to over $1B, and the average trade size increased, suggesting use by traders seeking exposure or hedging ahead of Monday's open. While an initial "discovery boundary" mechanism limited price discovery on the first weekend, subsequent weekends showed Hyperliquid's price increasingly converged with CME's Monday opening price, demonstrating its evolving price discovery capabilities. The report concludes that while Hyperliquid's absolute liquidity metrics are not comparable to CME, its growing weekend activity shows promise. However, high transaction costs for large orders remain a major barrier to attracting institutional participants.

Odaily星球日报04/06 02:50

Data Research: How Big Is the Liquidity Gap Between Hyperliquid and CME Crude Oil?

Odaily星球日报04/06 02:50

活动图片