2026-06-05 Sexta

Centro de Notícias - Página 376

Obtém notícias cripto em tempo real e tendências de mercado com o Centro de Notícias da HTX.

People Laid Off by AI Won't Disappear; They Will Become the Creators of the Next Economy

The article argues that the real question surrounding AI is not whether it will cause unemployment, but what happens to the people displaced. AI is replacing not humans, but the standardized, replicable, and automatable parts of human work. This follows historical patterns where technological revolutions, from stone tools to computers, made old skills obsolete and dissolved old structures—but humanity adapted and reorganized. The author draws a parallel to China’s large-scale layoffs during state-owned enterprise reforms 30 years ago, which initially seemed catastrophic but eventually fueled the growth of a new private economy, new companies, and new types of jobs. Engineers, though among the first impacted, are also positioned to recover fastest. Their systemic understanding and proximity to new productive forces make them ideal candidates to adapt and create in the new economy. More importantly, AI is reshaping companies themselves—reducing organizational bloat, communication costs, and bureaucracy. This enables smaller, more agile teams and empowers strong creators who may have previously struggled with management rather than innovation. The core issue is not job loss, but self-definition: will individuals wait to be reassigned by the old system, or use new tools to reorganize production? AI accelerates differentiation—eliminating some jobs, shattering illusions for some, and offering others a chance to leap forward. The author’s view is that AI is dismantling an entire generation’s belief in stable career paths. Those laid off won’t vanish; instead, many will reinvent themselves—transitioning from employees in old systems to creators of the next economy. Every productivity revolution淘汰 (eliminates) not people, but those who refuse to rewrite themselves. The first to accept this and start building the new world will succeed.

marsbit03/23 10:31

People Laid Off by AI Won't Disappear; They Will Become the Creators of the Next Economy

marsbit03/23 10:31

A Crypto Gamble That Split a Century-Old Swiss Private Bank?

An internal conflict over cryptocurrency strategy has led to a generational split within the Swiss private banking family behind Banque Syz. Marc Syz left the bank, led by his father Eric Syz, after the board rejected his proposal to integrate Future Holdings AG—a crypto treasury firm—into the bank’s alternative asset division, Syz Capital. Marc, who previously headed Syz Capital, is now pursuing a dual IPO for Future Holdings in Sweden and Switzerland, aiming to build one of Europe’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasuries. The dispute reflects broader tensions within Switzerland’s wealth management sector, where traditional private banks face intense competition and divergent views on innovation. Marc advocated for greater focus on digital assets and AI, warning that some banks rely too heavily on Switzerland’s reputation as a financial safe haven without adapting to new trends. Following the rejection of the merger, Marc and his business partner Richard Byworth resigned from Syz Capital and are launching a new asset management firm focused on alternative investments. Meanwhile, Banque Syz reaffirmed its commitment to alternative investments as a core business pillar and recently appointed Eric’s other son, Nicolas Syz, as CEO. The split underscores both the difficulties of family business governance and the high-stakes divergence in strategy between traditional finance and emerging digital asset models in Switzerland.

marsbit03/23 09:49

A Crypto Gamble That Split a Century-Old Swiss Private Bank?

marsbit03/23 09:49

Token Doesn't Need a Chinese Name, But the Business Behind It Does

Recent discussions in China have intensified around finding an appropriate Chinese translation for the technical term "Token," driven by its growing economic and industrial significance. Previously an obscure technical term within AI circles, Token has now entered mainstream discourse due to its role as a billing unit in cloud services, a revenue metric for AI companies, and a key indicator in national AI industry statistics. Proposed translations include "智元" (suggested by AI media, implying "intelligence unit"), "模元" (proposed by academics, leaning toward "model unit"), and "符元" (a more neutral, technical term meaning "symbol unit"). The debate is not merely linguistic but reflects broader commercial and narrative control over the AI industry. Different translations align with different stakeholders’ interests: "智元" benefits those emphasizing intelligent computation, while "模元" reinforces the role of model developers. The term already had an academic translation—“词元” (ciyuan)—since 2021, but it gained little attention until Tokens became a valuable economic unit. As Token consumption in China surges—reaching 180 trillion per day—the naming contest underscores deeper issues of market influence, branding, and “coinage” rights in the emerging AI-driven economy. Ultimately, those who produce Tokens may hold the power to define them, regardless of the chosen name.

marsbit03/23 08:48

Token Doesn't Need a Chinese Name, But the Business Behind It Does

marsbit03/23 08:48

活动图片