Lessons we learned from the Terraform-FTX implosions

CointelegraphPublicado em 2022-12-10Última atualização em 2022-12-10

Resumo

The crises cryptocurrency experienced in 2022 served as a reminder of some classic bits of investing wisdom.

In May 2022, Terraform Labs’ LUNA cryptocurrency and TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin collapsed, triggering a massive shock in the crypto industry. Six months later, the bruised industry took another hammering as one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, FTX, filed for bankruptcy protection and billions of dollars of user assets went missing. The FTX empire, once valued at more than $30 billion, fell to zero in fewer than 10 days.

FTX reportedly has more than 1 million creditors, most of whom are retail investors who were convinced that FTX would not collapse and had been keeping their assets on the exchange. Taking a look at Mt. Gox in 2014 — whose creditors still failed to reclaim compensation — FTX may be a repeat of that mistake.

It can be said that FTX succeeded because of Alameda Research, and failed because of Alameda too. An investigative report led careful users to uncover serious problems with Alameda’s balance sheet, which then led to a deeper dive into its unclear, unexplained financial dealings with FTX.

Many well-known venture capital and crypto companies have also been caught in the trouble. Sequoia Capital, Temasek and others announced that they were making their investments in FTX down to zero; BlockFi, a crypto lending platform, has filed for bankruptcy due to its exposure to FTX; and crypto broker Genesis, a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, is on the verge of bankruptcy due to a liquidity crisis and may not be able to repay investors’ funds.

When the crypto tide ebbed, we knew who was swimming naked. After the craze, the market is left in a mess.

The collapse of FTX provides a precious opportunity for all users, practitioners and lawmakers to reflect on the problems and reinvent the crypto industry.

I don’t think we should blame the FTX failure on cryptocurrency itself. It doesn’t mean that the emergence of Bitcoin and the crypto industry was a mistake. We should be thinking about the business models that cryptocurrency exchanges run and how to effectively decentralize governance, etc.

The overturned cart ahead is a warning to the ones behind. The implosion of exchanges is mainly attributed to their untransparent funding disclosure. We have seen that the top cryptocurrency exchanges — including Binance, OKX and Huobi — have announced their fund reserves to prove their security to ensure the interests of users.

The shock of FTX’s bankruptcy still needs much time to be digested, and the crisis will not stop here, but I believe in the unstoppable bursting momentum of the crypto industry.

The crypto industry has its twists and turns as it develops, but its future is promising. While 2022 is a particularly tough year for the crypto space, it will continue to grow, evolve and look for a way out amid the skepticism.

With the COVID-19 pandemic raging and the global “rate hike wave,” the crypto winter could be harsher and more prolonged than expected. Although we cannot precisely predict and estimate how long it will last, we can get over the difficulties together.

As a journalist who has worked on the front line of the industry for many years, I have learned some deep lessons from the LUNA crash to the FTX collapse:

If you hear any rumors about the insolvency of an exchange or a project, be sure to transfer your assets out as soon as possible. As an old Chinese saying goes, a true man won’t stand beside a collapsing wall.

Not your key, not your coins. This is a cliche, but it is also a truth. The only way we can protect our crypto assets is by keeping our own private keys.

Cash is king when a crisis occurs. As bubbles burst and asset prices plunge, holding cash can make us safely survive the difficult period.

Don’t borrow money to invest, and don’t leverage. For most people, borrowing and leveraging will only accelerate bankruptcy. FTX was not immune to this.

Keep up with the industry by learning new things about centralized finance and decentralized finance, tokenomics, on-chain activity, how to use cold wallets, etc.

Personally, I am a crypto enthusiast and supporter with a long-term vision for blockchain technology. The crypto industry has faced its darkest hour more than once. There’s no making without breaking, and I hope we can regain our confidence and trust in the industry.

Leituras Relacionadas

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

Preferred Shares Are Not the Catalyst for Corporate Bankruptcy; MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027. This article analyzes the nature of preferred shares used by MicroStrategy (MSTR). Legally equity but economically similar to debt, these shares, including its Bitcoin-linked STR convertible preferred notes (STRC), offer fixed or floating dividends. Crucially, MicroStrategy's preferred shares lack rigid redemption clauses, meaning they are not classified as traditional debt. This eliminates principal repayment pressure and means missed dividends do not constitute default or trigger bankruptcy, creating a "self-contradictory virtuous cycle." The article clarifies that if funds are short, MicroStrategy can defer or suspend preferred share dividends (except for non-cumulative types like STRD) without immediate risk. The real potential crisis point lies with its convertible bonds. If a prolonged bear market prevents conversion, MicroStrategy might need to sell Bitcoin to repay these bonds starting from the earliest maturity in September 2027, potentially creating a downward spiral. Preferred dividend suspensions would only exacerbate market panic in such a scenario. Recent financial activity shows MicroStrategy strengthened its position through four weeks of common stock (MSTR) issuances, raising over $851 million without issuing new preferred shares. It increased its dollar reserves to approximately $1.4 billion, which is sufficient to cover all preferred share dividends and interest until around March 2027. While Bitcoin purchases slowed recently, this prioritization of cash reserves enhances the company's near-term financial safety. The analysis concludes that if the Bitcoin bear market ends by early 2025 as anticipated, MicroStrategy can resume issuing MSTR stock in a rising market to replenish reserves and manage future dividend obligations, thereby reducing the long-term pressure from its preferred share structure.

marsbitHá 49m

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

marsbitHá 49m

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbitHá 1h

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbitHá 1h

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手Há 9h

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手Há 9h

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbitHá 11h

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbitHá 11h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片