Wall Street Banks Seen as Unlikely Saviors as Crypto Firms Struggle

CoinDeskPublicado em 2022-11-21Última atualização em 2022-11-21

Resumo

Blockchain true believers say the nascent industry represents an existential threat to traditional finance. But now's probably not the time for Wall Street to gobble up ailing crypto firms, analysts say.

It took years for the crypto industry to gain trust – and capital – from the major institutional players on Wall Street. And just as more big traditional players seemed on the cusp of making a move into fast-growing blockchain markets, the messy collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire has renewed comparisons of the digital-asset industry to the Wild West.

As the Welsh poet Robert Williams said, “Trust is the easiest thing in the world to lose, and the hardest thing in the world to get back.”

But one question now is whether big banks might see the crypto industry’s latest troubles as an attractive opportunity to nose into blockchain-based markets.

In May this year, U.S. banking giant JPMorgan Chase signed two popular crypto exchanges as clients, as sign that Wall Street is starting to accept cryptocurrencies to the extent that it sees value in them for their own future.

Might some major banks be looking to step in as savior in times when the industry is struggling, just as John Pierpont Morgan himself once rescued the banking industry in the early 20th century, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve? (The Fed, which famously saved Wall Street from collapsing during the financial crisis of 2008, does not stand behind the less-regulated crypto industry.)

Experts say it’s unlikely.

“Banks are the natural enemy of the crypto industry because they both sell purportedly the same product line, so it’s unlikely that they would be willing to step in to assist the industry,” Odeon Capital Group chief financial strategist Dick Bove said.

In a press statement following the collapse of crypto exchange FTX, the Bank Policy Institute, which represents big banks, said in a statement that “as FTX files for bankruptcy after failing to secure a bailout, policymakers should ensure they do not embed crypto firms in the heart of the financial system by giving them Fed accounts."

If they did, "the next crisis in the cryptoverse could threaten financial stability,” according to the statement.

Not a problem

Banks, however, have gotten increasingly interested and tried to get a foothold in the industry. Besides JPMorgan, crypto-friendly banking institution Silvergate Bank signed over 850 digital currency customers, including 61 exchanges, 541 institutional investors and 248 other customers.

“The banks that are in this business are going to say, ‘It’s not going to cause a problem for us,’ and the ones who aren’t in it will say, ‘We told you so,’ but they’re not going to be of any help,” Bove said.

Silvergate’s stock is down 10% in November, after it announced that it had exposure to failed crypto exchange FTX. As of Sept. 30, the bank had a total of $11.9 billion in deposits from all digital asset customers, of which FTX's was less than 10%.

U.S. exchanges also might be out of the game.

“For heavily U.S.-regulated exchanges, I doubt that Wall Street would be interested,” said Jim Bianco, president and macro strategist at Bianco Research. “For off-shore exchanges, their regulator would probably force them to resign if they touched any of them.”

He says traditional banks don’t understand the crypto business well enough to take the risk of jumping in.

It goes without saying that regulators might be reluctant to even let big Wall Street firms swallow a big crypto firm, with so many officials quite vocal about the risks from the digital-asset industry. They’ve been slow to create a broad regulatory framework that would embrace crypto as part of the existing financial system.

Wall Street banks probably don't mind too much watching the crypto industry flounder, Bove said.

“Banks aren’t worried about the crypto industry breaking away” right now, he said. “Just about every major bank knows how to create its own tokens. If it wants into the industry it is not hard to get there. What the banks want is to avoid their core business from being cannibalized.”

Leituras Relacionadas

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Decentralized Reasoning: Beyond the Hype, a Key to Breaking AI's Centralized Monopoly A future scenario where a powerful AI model is banned by a major government illustrates the core value proposition of decentralized AI: resistance to censorship. The core bet of decentralized inference networks is mitigating this risk, with other benefits like cost being secondary. The path is extremely difficult, involving four key challenges: 1. **Running Massive Models:** Distributing a single model across a decentralized GPU swarm requires sophisticated techniques like pipeline and speculative decoding to overcome crippling network latency, aiming for usable speeds (e.g., 30-40 tokens/second). 2. **Proving Model Integrity:** Verifying that a node runs the correct model is critical. Solutions range from cryptographically secure but slow ZKML to faster, economically-secure methods like statistical fingerprints, deterministic re-execution, or live-weight proofs, each involving trade-offs between integrity, latency, and cost. 3. **Ensuring Prompt Privacy:** Simply sharding a model does not protect user inputs from nodes. Robust solutions currently require trusted hardware (TEEs) or advanced cryptography (FHE), which are not yet widely deployed in consumer swarms. 4. **Building a Real Market:** Identifying the ideal customer is tough. Beyond speculative AI agents, the viable market currently consists of startups embedding AI and projects needing batch processing (e.g., synthetic data generation), where decentralized aggregation can be an advantage over low-latency needs. The article analyzes several projects tackling these problems, such as Dolphin Network (live-weight proofs), Inference.net (statistical verification), Morpheus (TEE-based), and Darkbloom (Apple Secure Enclave). It provides a framework: decentralization is a "tax" for latency-sensitive applications (e.g., chat) but a potential supply-side advantage for throughput-oriented tasks (e.g., batch processing). The long-term vision is a closed data loop where decentralized inference generates valuable data (traces, preferences) to feed decentralized training networks, which in turn produce better open-weight models for the inference networks. A due diligence checklist advises focusing on projects that: are truly decentralized at specific layers; have a credible integrity method; offer real cost benefits; ensure genuine privacy; handle node reliability; have paying users; and are built by teams with deep AI expertise. The ultimate goal should be products that appeal beyond the crypto-native audience, using crypto mechanisms invisibly to deliver better cost, performance, or privacy.

Foresight NewsHá 13m

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Foresight NewsHá 13m

The Final Piece of Franklin Templeton's Crypto Ambition

Franklin Templeton Completes Crypto Ambition with Acquisition of 250 Digital On June 22, Franklin Templeton announced the acquisition of 250 Digital and established Franklin Crypto, a new division focused on actively managed cryptocurrency strategies for institutional investors. The unit is led by Christopher Perkins and Seth Ginns. This acquisition marks a key piece in Franklin Templeton's multi-year crypto strategy, which began in 2018 with a digital assets team. The firm's crypto product suite now spans three layers: tokenized funds like the blockchain-based money market fund BENJI (~$831M AUM); a series of passive ETFs including Bitcoin (EZBC, ~$368M), Ethereum (EZET), XRP (XRPZ, ~$252M), Solana (SOEZ), and a multi-crypto index fund (EZPZ); and the newly added active management strategies from Franklin Crypto. The company has also expanded its crypto ecosystem through investments in projects like Ethena and Crossmint, and collaborations with blockchains such as Aptos and Sui. With approximately $18B in digital asset AUM and a total firm AUM of ~$1.78T, Franklin Templeton is positioning itself as a comprehensive crypto asset manager for pensions and sovereign wealth funds. In contrast, competitor Fidelity Investments has taken a different path, focusing early on building its own custody and trading infrastructure. Fidelity's Bitcoin ETF (FBTC) holds over $11B, significantly larger than Franklin Templeton's equivalent offering. Both giants' moves underscore the deepening trend of traditional finance entering the crypto space.

Foresight NewsHá 37m

The Final Piece of Franklin Templeton's Crypto Ambition

Foresight NewsHá 37m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片