[Key interpretation] The strong earthquake of AXS 232% prompted the main force to protect the market, and the long-term investors of BTC sold again

JinsPublicado em 2022-11-17Última atualização em 2022-11-18

Resumo

In the process of BTC bottoming, wait for the price to stabilize.

1. BTC rebound pressure is high

The short-term trend of BTC price is very weak, and the rebound strength is not high during the relative contraction of trading volume. Judging from this, the selling pressure generated during the rapid price drop on November 8 and 9 in the previous period was relatively large, which still limited the price increase. In addition, the volume effect of these two trading days is the highest in history. The 24-hour peak volume on November 8 and 9 reached more than twice the average volume in the recent three months. As a result, more investors' cost of holding coins fell within the range of 15588 to 20600 dollars. It is necessary to break through this price range. At present, the trading volume is shrinking and the rebound is more difficult.

2. Increase in turnover of BTC long-term investors

From the performance of the number of destroyed currency days, the number of destroyed currency days on November 16 rebounded again, reaching a high of 35.27 million. According to this judgment, there is still room for a rebound in the turnover rate of long-term investors in the near future, and the cumulative BTC turnover rate is rising. Long term investors change hands with BTC, which means that their currency holdings are still in an obvious loose state, which is unfavorable for BTC's short-term stability. At present, BTC is at the bottom of the horizontal market. Although it has the cost advantage of low absorption, it is unlikely to make profits after buying in the near future.

3. ETH price performance is low

After the fall of ETH's early classification, the recent trading volume is still in a shrinking state, and the volume and price performance are sluggish, which means that there is little room for ETH to achieve growth in the near future. On November 10, the ETH price reached a minimum of $1073. Therefore, after the technical rebound, ETH may retest the support effect of this point. US $1106 is also the support level for 78.6% of Fibonacci, so investors should pay special attention to trading signals.

4. AXS rebounds strongly

Recently, the price shock of AXS has increased significantly. On November 13, the price fluctuation amplitude of AXS reached 232%, and the highest price hit $19.12. If we calculate from the closing price of $6.52 on November 12, AXS's short-term increase is as high as 293%. Judging from this, AXS's market performance is exceptionally strong, but the profitability of short-term trading is unlikely. As AXS's short-term rise was completed during the period of rising and falling, the main rise and fall process lasted only one hour. From the perspective of the main force holding money, it may be a means for the main force to save itself.

5. AXS's main currency holding rebounded and fell back

From the perspective of the number of coins held by AXS, the top 10 coins held have a large fluctuation space. As early as October 23 to October 25, the proportion of AXS held by the top 10 major holders of coins rose from 96.5% to 97.24%, and the number of coins held could be 0.74 percentage points higher. Next, AXS's currency holding has little room for fluctuation. On November 12, 96.91% of AXS held by the top 10 players of AXS was higher than that on October 23. According to this judgment, 232% of the AXS strong earthquake on November 13 may be caused by the main trading. After all, AXS's closing price on November 12 contracted by more than 40% from the previous high.

Similar short-term self-help actions of the main players will occur, but in the process of confirming the bottom of the mainstream currency recently, the rebound expectation is not high, so pay attention to the risk of catching up.

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight NewsHá 4m

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight NewsHá 4m

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报Há 8m

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报Há 8m

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbitHá 16m

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbitHá 16m

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbitHá 30m

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 30m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片