[Huobi Future Tutorial] How to Transfer Assets in Huobi Future?

HTX LearnPublicado em 2022-07-24Última atualização em 2022-08-25

Resumo

How to transfer your assets for future trading in Huobi?

【APP】

1. Account Activation

Users can tap [Futures] tab at the bottom, then tap [USDT-M] contracts on the top, and select the contract type & account mode you prefer to trade.

2. Asset Transfer

USDⓈ-margined contract accounts are divided into Cross margin account and Isolated margin account. There is only one cross margin account. While under the isolated margin mode, there are isolated margin accounts in each pair. Take isolated-margined BTC/USDT account as an example, the margin in this account can only be used for BTC/USDT Prep.

At present, the margin for USDⓈ-margined contracts can only be USDT, which is available to transfer from Spot Account. Meanwhile, transferring among each isolated margin account and the cross margin account is available.

2.1 Click Transfer Button

Method 1: Click the Transfer icon on the derivatives trading page.

Method 2: Click the [Margin Transfer] under the [+] icon at the top right.

2.2 Select Transfer-in/out account and cryptos

If you want to trade USDⓈ-margined contracts in the cross margin mode, you need to transfer USDT from Spot Account/an Isolated-margined USDⓈ-M account to the [USDⓈ-M Account-USDT Cross].

If you want to trade USDⓈ-margined contract in the isolated margin mode, you need to transfer USDT to the corresponding isolated-margined USDⓈ-M account. For example, when trading isolated-margined BTC/USDT Prep, you need to transfer USDT to the [USDⓈ-M Account-BTC/USDT]. Please make sure that USDT is available to transfer from the Spot Account, the cross-margined USDⓈ-M Account or other isolated-margined USDⓈ-M Accounts.

【WEB】

1. Account Activation

Visit Huobi Futures official website: futures.huobi.com and log in to your account. Click [USDⓈ-M Contracts] and enter into the contract trading page.

2. Asset Transfer

USDⓈ-margined contract accounts are divided into Cross margin account and Isolated margin account. There is only one cross margin account. While under the isolated margin mode, there are isolated margin accounts in each pair. Take isolated-margined BTC/USDT account as an example, the margin in this account can only be used for BTC/USDT Perpetual.

At present, the margin for USDⓈ-margined contracts can only be USDT, which is available to transfer from Exchange Account. Meanwhile, transferring among each isolated margin account and the cross margin account is available.

2.1 Click Transfer Button

Click the Transfer button in the Asset Sector on the trading page.

2.2 Select Transfer-in/out account and currency

If you wish to trade USDT-margined contracts in the Cross margin mode, you need to transfer USDT from Exchange Account or any Isolated-margined USDⓈ-M account to the [USDⓈ-M Account-USDT Cross].

If you want to trade USDT-margined contract in the isolated margin mode, you need to transfer USDT to the corresponding isolated-margined USDⓈ-M account. For example, when trading BTC/USDT Perpetual in the isolated margin mode, you need to transfer USDT to the [USDⓈ-M Account-BTC/USDT]. And USDT is available to transfer from the Exchange Account, the cross-margined USDⓈ-M Account or other isolated-margined USDⓈ-M Accounts.

Leituras Relacionadas

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, recently celebrated its sixth anniversary. Born during New York's COVID-19 lockdown, founder Shayne Coplan built the initial product from his bathroom. The platform allows users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events, aiming to aggregate information faster than traditional media or polls. Its early years involved navigating regulatory challenges, most notably a 2022 CFTC order and penalty for offering unregistered event contracts, which led to a ban on U.S. users. Despite this "exile," the platform persisted, gaining significant traction during major news events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election, where its markets often preceded mainstream narratives. A pivotal shift occurred in 2025. Following the conclusion of a DOJ/CFTC investigation, Polymarket strategically acquired a CFTC-regulated exchange (QCX) to re-enter the U.S. market legally. It secured a massive strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), NYSE's parent company, and formed high-profile partnerships with sports leagues like the NHL, UFC, and MLB, as well as media outlets including Google and the Wall Street Journal. Now valued in the tens of billions, Polymarket stands at the intersection of crypto, finance, media, and sports. Its journey reflects a constant tension between innovative information aggregation and regulatory scrutiny, evolving from a fringe crypto experiment into a mainstream, albeit still contested, financial and data infrastructure.

marsbitHá 11m

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

marsbitHá 11m

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

"Metaplanet's 'Side Hustle Survival': After the 'Crypto Hoarding Flywheel' Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue" The article discusses the strategic pivot of Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies as the once-lucrative model of hoarding cryptocurrencies, pioneered by MicroStrategy, faces challenges. With the crypto bear market and the rise of ETFs offering direct, low-premium exposure, many DAT firms are abandoning the passive treasury model. Prominent examples include ETHZilla, which sold ETH to repay debt and shifted to RWA tokenization, and others like Prenetics Global exiting completely. Facing stalled growth, remaining companies are pursuing two main survival paths. The first path is transforming into institutional crypto asset management platforms and yield funds. SharpLink Gaming exemplifies this by staking 100% of its ETH and partnering with Galaxy Digital to launch a yield fund. GameSquare is taking a more aggressive approach, using AI-driven algorithms across DeFi protocols to seek higher returns. The second path involves becoming blockchain infrastructure operators, particularly in the Solana ecosystem. Companies like DeFi Development and SOL Strategies are moving beyond holding SOL to operating validator networks and launching liquid staking tokens, building fee-based revenue models from ecosystem participation. The article notes these transitions reflect a broader industry maturation, shifting from financial engineering to building operational moats through technology, network effects, and deep ecosystem integration. However, risks remain, including DeFi protocol vulnerabilities and dependence on specific blockchain networks' health. Ultimately, this collective shift signals that in crypto, sustainable value comes not from capital games but from active participation, cash flow generation, and providing real utility—a necessary, if painful, step towards industry maturity.

marsbitHá 12m

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

marsbitHá 12m

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

Leaked OpenAI financial documents from June 2026 revealed that in 2025, the company achieved $13.07 billion in revenue, a 253% growth from 2024. However, this was accompanied by an operational loss of $20.92 billion and a net loss of roughly $8 billion. Despite ChatGPT surpassing 900 million weekly active users, the "burn rate" remained high: for every $1 earned, $1.60 was spent. The cost structure shows $34 billion in total costs. R&D was the largest expense at $19.18 billion, which included $10.59 billion paid to Microsoft. Compute costs for model inference were $7.5 billion, with sales and marketing at $5.73 billion. Notably, total payments to Microsoft reached $17.2 billion, accounting for over 50% of OpenAI's total costs and exceeding its annual revenue, highlighting a significant structural burden. This high-cost, high-loss model is an industry-wide trend. xAI reported a 2025 operational loss of $6.4 billion against $3.2 billion in revenue, spending $3 for every $1 earned. Anthropic, with a reported $90 billion annualized revenue by late 2025, also faced pressure with a 40% gross margin, lower than expected due to high inference costs. Combined, these top three firms' operational losses surpassed $30 billion in 2025. OpenAI's vast user base presents a monetization challenge. With only about 50 million of its 900 million weekly users paying (a ~5.6% conversion rate), the compute cost of serving free users is substantial. This contrasts with strategies like Anthropic's, which focuses on premium pricing for enterprise clients. The industry's path to profitability hinges on dramatically reducing marginal costs, particularly for inference, through innovations in specialized chips or model efficiency. Until then, massive capital inflows—like OpenAI's $122 billion funding round in March 2026—remain essential to fund the relentless pursuit of scale and advanced capabilities.

marsbitHá 24m

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

marsbitHá 24m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片