Gelombang Kejut Crypto: Circle Digugat Saat Peretasan Drift $280 Juta Terungkap

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-04-17Última atualização em 2026-04-17

Resumo

Gelombang kejutan crypto: Circle digugat dalam kasus peretasan Drift senilai $280 juta. Penggugat mengklaim bahwa perusahaan stablecoin itu memiliki kemampuan untuk menghentikan dana curian yang dipindahkan melalui protokol transfer lintas blockchain miliknya, tetapi tidak bertindak. Gugatan class action ini diajukan di pengadilan federal Massachusetts oleh investor Drift Protocol, mewakili lebih dari 100 anggota yang terdampak. Kasus ini menjadi tajam karena hanya seminggu sebelum peretasan, Circle membekukan 16 dompet USDC terkait kasus perdata AS. Penggugat menuduh Circle lalai dan membantu penjahat. Peretasan ini diduga dilakukan oleh peretas Korea Utara yang mendanai program nuklir negara itu. Meski ada yang membela keputusan Circle untuk tidak bertindak tanpa perintah pengadilan, gugatan ini menantang batasan tanggung jawab perusahaan dalam ekosistem crypto.

Peretas Korea Utara kemungkinan mengantongi ratusan juta dana crypto yang dicuri — dan kini pengadilan AS diminta untuk memutuskan apakah raksasa stablecoin seharusnya menghentikan mereka.

Rekam Jejak Circle Sendiri Menjadi Senjata Andalan

Gugatan class action yang diajukan di pengadilan federal Massachusetts pekan ini menamakan Circle Internet Group sebagai tergugat, dengan para penggugat berargumen bahwa perusahaan tersebut memiliki sarana dan kesempatan untuk menghentikan sekitar $280 juta USDC yang dicuri agar tidak berpindah melintasi blockchain — dan tidak melakukan apa pun.

Kasus ini diajukan oleh investor Drift Protocol Joshua McCollum, yang mewakili lebih dari 100 anggota yang terdampak. Pengacara mereka menyatakannya dengan jelas: Circle mengizinkan penggunaan kriminal dari teknologinya sendiri.

Keluhan diajukan pada hari Rabu di pengadilan distrik AS Massachusetts oleh investor Drift Joshua McCollum, mewakili lebih dari 100 anggota.

Serangan 1 April pada Drift Protocol melihat para penyerang menguras dana dan merutekannya dari Solana ke Ethereum menggunakan Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol milik Circle, sebuah alat bridging yang dioperasikan perusahaan. Transfer terjadi selama beberapa jam, menurut laporan. Jendela kesempatannya terbuka lebar.

Apa yang membuat gugatan ini sangat tajam adalah apa yang terjadi hanya beberapa hari sebelum peretasan. Sekitar seminggu sebelumnya, Circle membekukan 16 dompet USDC yang terkait dengan kasus perdata AS yang disegel. Para penggugat menangkap detail itu. Jika Circle bisa bergerak cepat untuk urusan yang terkait pengadilan, mereka berargumen, perusahaan juga bisa bertindak di sini. Fakta tunggal itu berada di pusat pertarungan hukum.

Tuduhan Mulai dari Kelalaian hingga Membantu Kejahatan

Gugatan ini membawa dua tuduhan utama: kelalaian dan membantu dan mendukung konversi — sebuah istilah hukum untuk membantu seseorang mengambil properti orang lain secara tidak sah. Firma hukum Mira Gibb menangani kasus untuk McCollum dan investor Drift lainnya. Ganti rugi belum ditetapkan dan akan ditentukan pada persidangan.

BTCUSD diperdagangkan di $75.081 pada bagan 24 jam: TradingView

Circle belum menanggapi permintaan komentar.

Firma analitik crypto Elliptic menandai serangan ini sebagai karya operatif yang didukung negara Korea Utara. Berdasarkan analisis Elliptic, para peretas mengeksekusi lebih dari 100 transaksi melalui infrastruktur bridging Circle selama jam kerja biasa AS. Setelah memindahkan dana ke Ethereum, aset yang dicuri dikonversi dan didorong melalui Tornado Cash, sebuah protokol privasi yang digunakan untuk mengaburkan jejak transaksi.

Gambar: SOPA Images/Getty Images

ARK Invest Membela Circle, Namun Taruhan Moral Tetap Tinggi

Tidak semua orang menuding Circle. Lorenzo Valente, direktur penelitian aset digital ARK Invest, berargumen bahwa Circle membuat keputusan yang tepat dengan tidak bertindak tanpa perintah hukum.

Kekhawatirannya: beri perusahaan seperti Circle kekuatan untuk membekukan dana hanya berdasarkan penilaian, dan setiap keputusan menjadi politis. Dia mempertanyakan dengan lantang di mana garis akan ditarik — antara peretas Korea Utara dan dompet mencurigakan di belahan dunia lain.

Gambar unggulan dari B&G Lawyers, bagan dari TradingView

Criptomoedas em alta

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
jst
JUSTJST
sun
SUNSUN

Perguntas relacionadas

QApa inti dari gugatan class action yang diajukan terhadap Circle Internet Group?

AInti gugatan class action terhadap Circle Internet Group adalah bahwa perusahaan tersebut dinilai lalai karena tidak membekukan sekitar $280 juta USDC yang dicuri dari peretasan Drift Protocol, padahal mereka memiliki kemampuan dan kesempatan untuk melakukannya.

QBagaimana peretas diduga memindahkan dana yang dicuri dari Solana ke Ethereum?

APeretas diduga memindahkan dana yang dicuri dari Solana ke Ethereum menggunakan Circle's Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol, sebuah alat bridging yang dioperasikan oleh Circle.

QMengapa gugatan terhadap Circle dianggap sangat kuat berdasarkan tindakan mereka sebelumnya?

AGugatan dianggap kuat karena hanya seminggu sebelum peretasan, Circle telah membekukan 16 dompet USDC yang terkait dengan kasus perdata AS, menunjukkan bahwa mereka memiliki kemampuan untuk bertindak cepat ketika ingin melakukannya.

QSiapa yang diidentifikasi oleh firma analitik Elliptic sebagai pelaku di balik serangan ini?

AFirma analitik kripto Elliptic mengidentifikasi bahwa serangan ini adalah karya operatif yang didukung oleh negara Korea Utara.

QApa argumen ARK Invest dalam membela keputusan Circle untuk tidak membekukan dana?

ALorenzo Valente dari ARK Invest berargumen bahwa Circle membuat keputusan yang tepat dengan tidak bertindak tanpa perintah hukum, karena memberikan kekuasaan kepada perusahaan untuk membekukan dana hanya berdasarkan penilaian sendiri dapat membuat setiap keputusan menjadi politis.

Leituras Relacionadas

The AI Memory Supercycle Is Here: Trade DRAM, Micron and SanDisk in One Crypto Account

The AI-driven memory shortage has created a significant bottleneck, with DRAM and NAND flash facing severe supply constraints through 2027. WEEX allows trading this theme within a single crypto account settled in USDT. The platform offers exposure through three key instruments: a direct DRAM/USDT spot trade on the shortage itself, MU perpetual futures representing sold-out leader Micron, and SNDK perpetual futures for higher-volatility NAND play SanDisk. This setup enables traders to rotate between the macro theme and specific company exposures without moving funds across different brokers. The piece highlights the unprecedented nature of the memory supercycle and positions WEEX as a unified venue to trade it, emphasizing the platform's security and user base.

TheNewsCryptoHá 23m

The AI Memory Supercycle Is Here: Trade DRAM, Micron and SanDisk in One Crypto Account

TheNewsCryptoHá 23m

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbitHá 58m

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbitHá 58m

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbitHá 2h

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbitHá 2h

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbitHá 2h

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbitHá 2h

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

The Federal Reserve Chairman is considering reducing the number of regular Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings held each year, a potential major shift from the current practice of eight meetings annually that has been in place since 1981. According to a report, the proposal was discussed internally, with possible details finalized ahead of the September meeting. This change would mean fewer formal opportunities to vote on interest rates and could diminish the Fed's ability to respond to economic data while reducing market access to policy signals, marking a reversal of the central bank's long-term trend towards greater transparency. While the 1935 Banking Act sets a legal minimum of four meetings per year, historical meeting frequency has varied. The move aligns with the Chairman's broader agenda of institutional reform since taking office, which includes revising communication practices and data usage. An internal memo from 1988 had previously concluded that the eight-meeting schedule remained appropriate. If implemented, this reduction in meetings would significantly reshape the Fed's operational rhythm and its interaction with financial markets.

marsbitHá 2h

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar DRIFT

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Drift Protocol (DRIFT) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Drift Protocol (DRIFT) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Drift Protocol (DRIFT)Depois de comprar o teu Drift Protocol (DRIFT), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Drift Protocol (DRIFT)Transaciona facilmente Drift Protocol (DRIFT) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

328 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar DRIFT

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de DRIFT (DRIFT) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow