Pyth Akan Meluncurkan Cadangan dengan Pembelian Kembali dari Dana Perbendaharaan DAO

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-12Última atualização em 2025-12-12

Resumo

Jaringan Pyth, penyedia oracle blockchain, mengumumkan rencana untuk mengalokasikan sepertiga dari pendapatan protokolnya melalui DAO guna membeli token PYTH di pasar terbuka. Strategi pembelian kembali ini bertujuan membentuk cadangan jaringan dan meningkatkan pendapatan serta nilai token. Harga PYTH telah turun lebih dari 80% dalam setahun terakhir, dan saat ini diperdagangkan sekitar $0.063. Inisiatif serupa pernah diusulkan oleh Aave DAO dengan $50 juta untuk membeli token AAVE, sementara usul buyback Mango Markets pada 2024 menuai kritik karena dianggap tidak transparan.

Pyth Network, penyedia oracle blockchain, mengumumkan akan mengonversi sebagian pendapatannya menjadi pembelian token PYTH sebagai bagian dari strategi cadangan.

Dalam postingan blog hari Jumat, Pyth menyatakan bahwa token yang dibeli di pasar terbuka dengan sepertiga pendapatan protokol melalui organisasi otonom terdesentralisasi (DAO) akan menjadi cadangan jaringan. Jaringan tersebut mengatakan strategi ini dirancang untuk meningkatkan pendapatan dan pembelian token.

"[S]udah waktunya untuk menulis ulang ekonomi data pasar di tingkat global," kata Pyth.

Harga token Pyth Network (PYTH) telah turun lebih dari 80% dalam setahun terakhir, meskipun sempat melonjak ketika platform memperdalam hubungan dengan pemerintah AS. Administrasi Trump mengumumkan pada Agustus bahwa perusahaan dan Chainlink akan bertanggung jawab untuk mempublikasikan data ekonomi negara tersebut secara onchain.

Menurut data dari Nansen, harga PYTH turun sekitar 1,3% dalam 24 jam terakhir, mencapai sekitar $0,063 pada saat publikasi.

Terkait: Grayscale meluncurkan dana investasi Pyth

DAO Aave mengusulkan inisiatif pembelian kembali serupa pada Oktober

DAO di balik protokol Aave memperkenalkan proposal yang akan menggunakan $50 juta dari pendapatan tahunannya untuk membeli kembali token aslinya, Aave (AAVE). Per hari Jumat, tampaknya proposal tersebut belum disetujui.

Tidak jelas bagaimana pengguna Pyth mungkin merespons rencana ini. Pada tahun 2024, ketika Mango Markets menyarankan program pembelian kembali untuk membeli token MNGO-nya, salah satu pendiri Daffy Durairaj menuduh para pembuatnya melakukan "perilaku tidak dapat dipercaya dan kepentingan sendiri".

Majalah: Ketika privasi dan hukum AML berbenturan: Pilihan mustahil proyek Crypto

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Perguntas relacionadas

QApa yang diumumkan Pyth Network terkait dana treasury DAO mereka?

APyth Network mengumumkan akan mengonversi sepertiga dari pendapatan protokol mereka untuk membeli token PYTH di pasar terbuka sebagai bagian dari strategi cadangan.

QBerapa persen penurunan harga token PYTH dalam setahun terakhir menurut artikel?

AHarga token PYTH mengalami penurunan lebih dari 80% dalam setahun terakhir.

QApa hubungan antara Pyth Network dengan pemerintah AS yang disebutkan dalam artikel?

APemerintah AS di bawah administrasi Trump mengumumkan pada Agustus bahwa Pyth Network dan Chainlink akan bertanggung jawab untuk mempublikasikan data ekonomi negara di blockchain.

QProposal serupa dengan inisiatif buyback Pyth pernah diajukan oleh protokol apa?

ADAO di balik protokol Aave mengajukan proposal yang akan menggunakan $50 juta dari pendapatan tahunannya untuk membeli kembali token asli mereka, AAVE.

QSiapa yang mengkritik program buyback Mango Markets pada tahun 2024 dan apa alasannya?

ACo-founder Mango Markets Daffy Durairaj mengkritik program buyback dengan menuduh para pembuatnya melakukan 'perilaku tidak dapat dipercaya dan self-dealing'.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHá 18m

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHá 18m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHá 23m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHá 23m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Há 32m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Há 32m

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHá 1h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHá 2h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar DAO

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de DAO Maker (DAO) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar DAO Maker (DAO) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu DAO Maker (DAO)Depois de comprar o teu DAO Maker (DAO), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona DAO Maker (DAO)Transaciona facilmente DAO Maker (DAO) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

262 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de DAO (DAO) são apresentadas abaixo.