Regulator Scrutiny Over Crypto Lender Voyager Intensifies

BitcoinistPublicado em 2022-07-11Última atualização em 2022-07-11

Resumo

Security regulators in Texas and Alabama have intensified investigations into crypto lender Voyager following the recent slump witnessed by the...

Security regulators in Texas and Alabama have intensified investigations into crypto lender Voyager following the recent slump witnessed by the platform.
Soon after the information emerged regarding the loans and the credit status of the borrowers, regulators expanded the investigation into the collapsed crypto lender platform.
Not just Voyager, even Celsius Network Ltd which also experienced a implosion recently has received the same treatment by the regulators. Currently securities regulators are looking into the information about the accuracy of the disclosed information provided by Voyager.
Texas State Securities Board, stated that,
What we’re seeing now is that a lot of these crypto-lending firms may not have fully disclosed what they were doing on the backside with investors’ money. The risks associated with those types of lending practices, or even the other types of transactions they are engaging in.
There has been concerns regarding information on the loans and even the creditworthiness of the borrowers, especially after Voyager Digital Ltd froze withdrawals the previous month.
Regulators from Texas, Albama and New Jersey has extended the investigation primarily due to the aforementioned reason.
Investigation Of Yield Product Offerings
Reports suggested that crypto regulators were focused on investigating yield-product offerings at Voyager. These also included the unregistered securities. Voyager was offering quite high rates of return. The platform still continues to offer these high rates of return.
Amanda Senn, chief deputy director at the Alabama Securities Commission, mentioned,
We are investigating these companies and trying to figure out what happened and why. We are making inquiries. It’s still the initial stages, but we have a responsibility on behalf of our investors in our states.
The State regulators had already begun their investigations in the middle of June and also early July right after Voyager suspended its withdrawal services. The investigations have been mainly surrounding the decision to cease the withdrawals.
Voyager Received A Huge Loan From Alameda Research
Voyager had ceased its withdrawal service beginning in the month of July. The platform has secured a $500 million loan from Alameda Research at the end of last month. Despite the loan, Voyager failed to wiggle out of the bankruptcy.
Voyager’s bankruptcy filing revealed that Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda Research had owed the platform over $377 million. Voyager had also mentioned that it would be announcing about its Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 5.
The company has recently appeared in court for the first time. Celsius is also among one of the companies that froze its withdrawals since mid June.
Not just Voyager and Celsius, other crypto firms also suffered due to the downturn across the industry.
Recently, Three Arrows Capital, a crypto hedge fund, filed its bankruptcy. Other companies have also froze the withdrawals, these include, CoinFLEX, Vauld and Babel Finance.

Crypto

Bitcoin was priced at $21,700 on the four hour chart | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView Featured image from Bloomberg.com, chart from Tradingview.com

Leituras Relacionadas

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbitHá 19m

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbitHá 19m

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手Há 23m

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手Há 23m

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbitHá 2h

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片