FUD – Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt – Is Relief Rally Near?

Huobi ResearchPublicado em 2022-06-23Última atualização em 2022-06-23

Resumo

Such levels of Fear, Uncertainly and Doubt provide an undervalued opportunity for crypto natives.

Abstract

Readers will be able to formulate a live market indicator to quantify crypto market sentiments using Glassnode’s calculator to generate their own strategies after reading this market report. The following pain level indicator, market participation rate, dormancy flow, net capital loss including potential and realization of all market players, and whale accumulation momentum could become a key part their strategies.

On-chain liquidation price is also a key level to when watching out for the bottom. When the liquidation price of ETH ranged between US$1014 and US$1080, ETH bottomed and rebounded on June 15, 2022.

The institutional capitulation including 3 Arrows Capital, Celsius and the Ether Fund also drove the market down. Liquidation price of the institutions were lowered to avoid liquidation. Outstanding units of ETF funds were also lowered to reduce risk exposure for longs.

Such levels of Fear, Uncertainly and Doubt provide an undervalued opportunity for crypto natives.

1. Current state of the market

Meet our new friend. Mr Margin.

In the aftermath of the CPI announcement, the crypto market checked all the boxes for FUDs – fear, uncertainty and doubt with pain, in addition to the prospect of liquidation prices and institutional insolvency.

The following sections will analyze the market with quantitative emotional indicators as well as quant on-chain metrics to analyze market intervals. On-chain liquidation data also triggered institutions to mass panic to sell at a loss. These institutions include MicroStrategy and The Ether Fund (QETH.U).

2. Market indicator

The following three indicators suggest the market is nearing a bottom. This report, however, should not be utilized as a source for financial and investment advice.

Pain indicator:

The purpose of the indicator is to find the bottom through the measurement of pain level. Pain level is estimated by the number and intensity of market players feeling depressed by watching current prices. Finding the pain level in a quantitative model would attempt to estimate the ultimate market pain. Markets usually have a tendency to bottom when the pain level hits maximum tolerance.

Figure 1: Pain level indicator

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Brief market analysis: By viewing the pain level indicator, the market is experiencing a very high level of pain. This level of pain only existed 3 times during the market bottoms of 2019, 2015 and 2012. This indicator is highly suggesting that the market is close to its bottom as most market players are already in depression, in pain or have exited.

Pain Level = ($Top_marketcap - $price * circ_supply)

* btc_amount_in_loss/ circ_supply

* (address balance>0.1 BTC / address balance>0.01 BTC)

* (1/Entity-Adjusted Dormancy Flow)

($Top_marketcap - $price * circ_supply) measures price difference between near ATH price and price now, to measure the sentiment of those who sold at a loss and those who are watching the price level from its all-time high (ATH)

btc_amount_in_loss/ circ_supply measures the market participation in loss as a factor per circulating supply which is more frequently traded compared to illiquid non-circulating supply

This is calculated as the market participation in pain:

Figure 2: Quantified market participants in pain

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

address balance>0.1 BTC / address balance>0.01 BTC measures the participation of serious market players out of participants who are willing to holding more than 0.01 BTC.

(1/Entity-Adjusted Dormancy Flow)= average of destroyed marketcap / (marketcap * volume)

The destroyed marketcap is referred to dormancy. Dormancy is the average number of days destroyed per coin transacted in any given day. A high level of dormancy refers to old coins that are destroyed for either market making or to force the market to panic sell when the whales are holding a large amount of coins. Factoring in the enforcement of panic sell behaviour into account, 1/dormancy flow is multiplied into the pain level indicator as a panic factor. It measures the tendency of panic sold marketcap as a proportion of the whole current marketcap to estimate the percentage of capital that was panic sold. Panic sold behaviour is thus analysed quantitatively.

Readers may have a glimpse of dormancy below:

Figure 3: Formula of bitcoin dormancy and dormancyflow with supply = bitcoin’s total supply

Figure 4: Inverse Dormancy Flow in red

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Figure 5: Pain level indicator

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Figure 6: Magnified pain level indicator hitting near ATH

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

This indicator nearly hits ATH, higher than many of the bottoms like the 2020 and 2012 bear market bottoms as well as the bottom from last year. It means most of the market players are in deep pain. The pain level that crypto market players is currently experiencing has only occurred 3 times across the entire lifetime of the crypto market. It also serves as an inverse indicator to signal market bottoms across the 5 market bottoms. We are now ahead of possible final capitulations.

Net Capital Loss Indicator:

The net loss indicator calculates all realized and unrealized capital loss, adjusted by the multiple of current market capitalization. When all capital loss indicators indicate losses with active market players, it signifies market bottoms. The net capital loss per active market player and net capital loss per all addresses is achieved by dividing net capital loss per active market player and sum of all addresses. This balances off the proportion of capital loss with the growth of addresses. The balance is vital in indicating market sentiments. If only net loss is counted, we could see a 2x increase of the capital loss from the previous bottoms. This is not rational as net loss grows bigger owing to a growing marketcap. That is why the grown market capital loss is offset by the increase in wallet address growth. As both have grown, we can measure average loss per active market player and per bitcoin address.

Figure 7: Net capital loss, net capital loss per all addresses and net capital loss per active market players are inversely proportional to market price movement.

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Figure 8: Net profit and loss chart is proportional to market price actions

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Big Whale Accumulation Indicator:

Here is the wallet accumulation chart of wallet addresses that have more than US$10,000 worth of BTC. An inversely proportional relationship began when the price of BTC rocketed and broke out at about US$20,000 since the bottoms observed during 2020. When the accumulation started, the market price action negatively correlated with the accumulation flow. This indicator signals a relative bottom due to the accumulation of BTC at lower prices.

Figure 9: Whale accumulation is negatively correlated with market price

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

3. On-Chain Liquidation and Institutional Panic

Eth liquidation price on AAVE, FUSE and Maker:

Eth fell to the price of US$1,015 at its low, and now its price has come across with the closed liquidation price of US$1,212 and a liquidation volume of around US$450 million. When Ethereum’s price fell, the stETH price also dropped in tandem which triggered a cascade of meltdowns for ETH’s derivative products. If stETH heads to the ratio of 0.8:1 of stETH:ETH, a liquidation volume close to US$350 million will be triggered.

Figure 10: Key liquidation level is updated as ETH $1212 on June 16 at a liquidation volume of close to $450M

Source: app.parsec.finance

Figure 11: Key liquidation level is updated as ETH $977 on June 16 at a liquidation volume of close to $230M

Source: app.parsec.finance

Figure 12: Key liquidation level started from 0.81 Steth:ETH on 15th June

Source: app.parsec.finance

Eth liquidation price with 3AC (3 Arrows Capital):

A liquidation price range of between US$1,080 and US$1,014 for Ethereum will trigger a collateral meltdown. According to Wu blockchain, the liquidation price of Ethereum of Three Arrows Capital is about US$1,014.

Figure 13: Key liquidation level ranged from US$1,080 - US$1,014, which is less than 10% from the ETH price of US$1,150

Source: app.parsec.finance

Figure 14: WuBlockchain’s analysis on 3AC’s collateral and liquidation price

Source: https://twitter.com/WuBlockchain

Celsius meltdown:

The liquidation price of US$20,272 of WBTC has caught the eye of market players. On June 13, the liquidation price of WBTC might have triggered a potential meltdown of US$478 million worth of collateral for Celsius.

Figure 15: Fear of potential liquidation of US$478 m triggering cascade effect on 13 June, 2022

Source: oasis.app

Since Celsius is actively paying back its debt, on early June 14, the liquidation price lowered to US$16,852.

Figure 16: Celsius’ active loan paying behavioral lowered liquidation price

Source: oasis.app

Figure 17: Celsius’ current liquidation price lowered $14,000

Source: oasis.app

Institutional Capitulations:

Institutions’ unrealized capital loss is reflected across social media.

Figure 18: All mainstream large cap and political party loss

Source: twitter.com/fx_margin_call

Figure 18: MicroStrategy logo improvised

Source: Twitter

The Ether Fund (QETH.U) Outstanding Units were also reduced to be sold as a loss. According to Glassnode, the holdings of QETH.U were reduced during the market crash, and a part of the holdings was sold as a loss.

Figure 19: QETH.U) Outstanding Units were decreased to reduce risk exposure

Source: Glassnode

4. Conclusion

Major market FUDs and pain level have been reflected by indicators. Behavioral traits of retail investors are against whales, meaning that they are inversely correlated. On-chain liquidations have triggered a cascade of draw-downs. The Market is experiencing a moment of capitulations. Investors are reminded to manage portfolio risks and acknowledge maximum drawdown.

About Huobi Research Institute

Huobi Blockchain Application Research Institute (referred to as "Huobi Research Institute") was established in April 2016. Since March 2018, it has been committed to comprehensively expanding the research and exploration of various fields of blockchain. As the research object, the research goal is to accelerate the research and development of blockchain technology, promote the application of blockchain industry, and promote the ecological optimization of the blockchain industry. The main research content includes industry trends, technology paths, application innovations in the blockchain field, Model exploration, etc. Based on the principles of public welfare, rigor and innovation, Huobi Research Institute will carry out extensive and in-depth cooperation with governments, enterprises, universities and other institutions through various forms to build a research platform covering the complete industrial chain of the blockchain. Industry professionals provide a solid theoretical basis and trend judgments to promote the healthy and sustainable development of the entire blockchain industry.

Official website:

https://research.huobi.com/

Consulting email:

research@huobi.com

Twitter: @Huobi_Research

https://twitter.com/Huobi_Research

Medium: Huobi Research

https://medium.com/huobi-research

Disclaimer

1. The author of this report and his organization do not have any relationship that affects the objectivity, independence, and fairness of the report with other third parties involved in this report.

2. The information and data cited in this report are from compliance channels. The sources of the information and data are considered reliable by the author, and necessary verifications have been made for their authenticity, accuracy and completeness, but the author makes no guarantee for their authenticity, accuracy or completeness.

3. The content of the report is for reference only, and the facts and opinions in the report do not constitute business, investment and other related recommendations. The author does not assume any responsibility for the losses caused by the use of the contents of this report, unless clearly stipulated by laws and regulations. Readers should not only make business and investment decisions based on this report, nor should they lose their ability to make independent judgments based on this report.

4. The information, opinions and inferences contained in this report only reflect the judgments of the researchers on the date of finalizing this report. In the future, based on industry changes and data and information updates, there is the possibility of updates of opinions and judgments.

5. The copyright of this report is only owned by Huobi Blockchain Research Institute. If you need to quote the content of this report, please indicate the source. If you need a large amount of reference, please inform in advance (see "About Huobi Blockchain Research Institute" for contact information) and use it within the allowed scope. Under no circumstances shall this report be quoted, deleted or modified contrary to the original intent.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hardcore First Look | Ocean Embodied Intelligence Company 'Shihang Intelligence' Secures Record-Breaking 1 Billion in Funding, Zhu Xiaohu, Temasek Place Bets

Breaking News | Ocean Embodied Intelligence company "Shihang Intelligent" secures a record-breaking 1 billion RMB (approximately 10 billion yuan) in Series A financing, with investment from Zhu Xiaohu and Temasek. Author: Qiu Xiaofen | Editor: Yuan Silai Ocean Embodied Intelligence company "Shihang Intelligent" has completed its Series A funding round, raising over 1 billion RMB. This marks the largest single funding round in the global marine robotics field to date. Investors include upstream momentum funds from chip companies "Moore Thread" and "Kunlunxin," Singapore's state-owned investment platform Vertex Growth, and listed company Dyneo, among others. Existing investors like GSR Ventures (whose founder Zhu Xiaohu has invested for the fifth time), Vertex Ventures China, Hua Ying Capital, and Long Capital also significantly increased their investments. Founder and CEO Chen Xiaobo, a 1989-born alumnus of Harbin Engineering University, is a long-time expert in underwater robotics. He received the National Defense Science and Technology Progress Award at age 28 (the youngest recipient) and led the development of China's first commercial underwater cleaning robot. The funds will be used for core technology R&D, global market expansion, and building the industry chain ecosystem to scale the application of marine robots in complex underwater scenarios. The ocean is considered one of the most challenging environments for robotics due to low light, high turbidity, complex currents, limited communication, high pressure, and corrosion. "Shihang Intelligent" focuses on developing core underlying technologies for marine robots, covering six key systems: power, control, sensing, navigation, sealing, and deployment. Its robots are capable of operating at depths from 0 to 10,000 meters with full degrees of freedom, performing complex maneuvers, autonomous navigation, and multi-robot collaboration. Applications include ship cleaning, underwater security, offshore wind power, marine ranching, and seabed inspection. The company's order value for the first half of 2026 alone has exceeded 1 billion RMB. Its "Orca Robot" is used by major shipping companies and has performed maintenance on over a thousand large vessels. In April of this year, the company launched its ocean embodied large model "Cangqiong CEORION." Unlike traditional remote-controlled or pre-programmed robots, this model integrates environmental perception, task understanding, and action generation into a single end-to-end architecture. Trained on millions of hours of commercial operation data and simulation data, it covers 12 major underwater operation scenarios. In simulations, it achieved over 90% task success rate and over 70% zero-shot adaptation capability to unseen environments. A built-in physics reasoning module reduces collision risk by 80%, enabling autonomous operation even with weak or no communication. Recently, "Shihang Intelligent" was selected as a core technology partner for Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority national hull inspection and cleaning program. These advancements indicate marine robotics is moving from pilot projects to scaled applications, with real-world operations generating valuable data to continuously improve robot capabilities. CEO Chen Xiaobo stated the company will continue investing in core marine robotics technology, the embodied intelligence model, and global application scenarios to expand into more high-risk, high-difficulty, and high-value underwater operations.

marsbitHá 23m

Hardcore First Look | Ocean Embodied Intelligence Company 'Shihang Intelligence' Secures Record-Breaking 1 Billion in Funding, Zhu Xiaohu, Temasek Place Bets

marsbitHá 23m

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbitHá 51m

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbitHá 51m

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Há 2h

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Há 2h

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHá 2h

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片