Over 70 Crypto ETFs Still in Limbo as SEC Leadership Transition Drags On

ccn.comPublicado em 2025-04-22Última atualização em 2025-04-22

Key Takeaways

  • Paul Atkins was confirmed as SEC chair.
  • Atkins secured a narrow Senate confirmation amid concerns about his Wall Street ties.
  • Over 70 pending crypto ETF applications, including those for SOL, XRP, and DOGE, await the new chair’s direction.

After a months-long delay, Paul Atkins officially took over as the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

His confirmation comes as over 70 crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) applications gather dust, awaiting a decision that could reshape how digital assets are regulated in the U.S.

Atkins, a former commissioner with deep ties to Wall Street, was confirmed after a contentious Senate floor vote earlier this month.

Democrats pushed back on his nomination, citing concerns over his deregulatory stance and close industry connections.

Nonetheless, the vote went through, and he was sworn in on April 21, ending a leadership vacuum that had stretched into President Donald Trump’s second term.

ETF Gridlock Breaks, Maybe

With Atkins now officially in place, the fate of dozens of crypto ETF proposals is back in play.

During the leadership gap, the SEC had effectively paused decisions on a wide range of applications, including those tied to XRP, Solana (SOL), Litecoin (LTC), and even memecoins like Dogecoin (DOGE).

The most closely watched filings involve spot ETFs for XRP and SOL, submitted by over a dozen asset managers.

Acting chair Mark Uyeda had overseen the SEC during the transition, but industry observers noted a reluctance to proceed with major crypto decisions without a confirmed leader.

The crypto industry is now looking to Atkins to either open the floodgates or keep them firmly shut.

A Hard Pivot on Crypto Regulation

Atkins has positioned himself as a crypto-friendly reformer, promising to ease what he describes as excessive red tape imposed during Joe Biden’s administration.

He has echoed Trump’s broader deregulatory vision and called for a more “innovation-forward” approach that prioritizes competitiveness in financial technology.

That outlook has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers, especially Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who argued Atkins could weaken investor protections and create space for illicit activity. She led a vocal opposition during his confirmation, warning that crypto deregulation could backfire.

Still, the administration has wasted no time charting a different course.

Since January, the SEC has dropped several high-profile enforcement actions against crypto companies.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) also quietly shut down its crypto-focused task force, signaling a broader pullback from the aggressive enforcement strategies of previous years.

Whether Atkins will fast-track ETF approvals or take a slower, more methodical approach remains to be seen. However, with investor interest growing and institutions waiting on regulatory clarity, the pressure is mounting.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Leituras Relacionadas

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

Collateral Dollars: How Does a "Second Layer of Dollars" Form on Top of Stablecoins? Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollar functions, expanding the offshore dollar system. However, stablecoins primarily replace specific functions like operational dollar balances for settlement. They do not inherently create new dollar credit; they substitute existing claims. The key question is: what happens when financial intermediaries use stablecoins as collateral to create a new layer of dollar-denominated claims? This "collateral dollar" channel operates through secured lending, not direct money creation. A money-like event only occurs when a liability issued against the controlled stablecoin is funded, rolled over, or accepted at near-par value by another balance sheet. The discount (haircut) prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility to bank dollars." Elasticity stems not from the stablecoin itself but from the liability issued against it and the willingness of third-party balance sheets to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Compared to the traditional Eurodollar system—where elasticity originates from bank deposit creation—the stablecoin collateral chain is structurally different. Eurodollar deposits are credit-expansive from inception. Stablecoins are initially substitutive; elasticity emerges later if an intermediary's liability against them gains monetary acceptance. Stablecoins disrupt specific tiers of the offshore dollar system, mainly replacing operational settlement balances. They do not replace the need for full dollar balance-sheet capacity (credit lines, hedging, maturity transformation). For systemic impact, the second-layer liability must pass three tests: transferability, funding capacity, and monetary acceptance (being fundable or held at par by others). Pressure transmission also differs. In the Eurodollar system, stress moves up a hierarchy of claims. In a stablecoin collateral chain, the second-layer liability can lose its money-like status well before the underlying stablecoin faces a run, often triggered by haircut increases and margin calls that create a dynamic spiral of falling token prices and rising discounts. In conclusion, the "collateral dollar" is not the stablecoin itself. It is the second-layer liability issued against a controlled token balance that is willing to be funded and maintained at near-par value. Its existence depends on that liability surviving the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity."

marsbitHá 1h

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片