Crypto Regulation Could Shift This Month as SEC Moves Ahead With Safe Harbor Proposal

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-07-08Última atualização em 2026-07-08

Resumo

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may release a key crypto rulemaking proposal, known as Regulation Crypto, as early as July. This marks a significant policy shift under Chair Paul Atkins, moving from enforcement actions toward formal rulemaking to provide regulatory clarity. The proposal is expected to create safe harbors and exemptions for certain activities like DeFi and tokenized securities, potentially benefiting startups valued under $5 million and allowing fundraising up to $75 million. It also outlines conditions for when a token would no longer be treated as a security. Concurrently, the fate of the broader CLARITY Act legislation remains uncertain; if it fails to pass by August 2026, the SEC's own rules could become the primary framework for the U.S. crypto market.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has put the industry on notice. The agency updated its 2026 regulatory agenda, revealing plans to release its long-awaited crypto rulemaking proposal as early as this month. It’s a move that would set the stage for one of the most significant shifts in U.S. digital asset policy in years.

The proposal, internally referred to as Regulation Crypto, has been in the works for months. When SEC Chair Paul Atkins first addressed this coming regulation in mid-March, he said it would be proposed in the coming weeks, but it did not arrive. Nearly four months later, the updated agenda places it firmly in July.

The SEC’s Approach Is Shifting

The latest initiative marks one of the first concrete regulatory proposals under Atkins’ leadership and signals a clear shift away from the SEC’s previous reliance on enforcement actions toward a formal rulemaking process aimed at providing greater regulatory clarity for the digital asset industry.

Under the previous administration, the agency filed dozens of cases against crypto firms, often without issuing workable guidance on what compliance actually looked like. That approach drew consistent criticism from the industry. This time, the SEC appears to be building a framework instead of a legal track record.

On the other hand, the Regulation Crypto proposal would establish safe harbours and exemptions for certain on-chain activities, including DeFi and tokenised securities. Eligible startups could be those valued under $5 million in their first four years, while entrepreneurs may raise up to $75 million through qualifying crypto investment contracts.

Once developers are no longer the driving force behind a crypto project, the token would no longer be treated as a security. Once a project’s developers have finished all work promised to investors, the token itself should step outside the SEC’s securities rules.

The CLARITY Act Factor

Supporters of the CLARITY Act argue that agency rulemaking alone cannot provide the long-term certainty the industry requires. Moreover, Senator Cynthia Lummis argued that the legislation represents a much broader decision about America’s role in the future financial system.

If the Clarity Act does not pass by August 2026, it is unlikely to become law in 2026 due to approaching midterm elections, which would leave the SEC’s own rulemaking as the primary framework governing U.S. crypto markets.

Crypto Market Highlights

Bitcoin (BTC) Tests a Critical Zone: Will Buyers Target $64K or Lose Ground to $60K?

TagsClarity ACTCrypto RegulationsSEC

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the SEC planning to release this month according to its updated regulatory agenda?

AThe SEC is planning to release its long-awaited crypto rulemaking proposal, internally referred to as Regulation Crypto, as early as this month.

QHow does the article describe the shift in the SEC's regulatory approach under Chair Paul Atkins?

AThe article describes a clear shift away from the SEC's previous reliance on enforcement actions toward a formal rulemaking process aimed at providing greater regulatory clarity for the digital asset industry.

QWhat are some potential exemptions or safe harbors included in the Regulation Crypto proposal?

AThe proposal would establish safe harbours and exemptions for certain on-chain activities, including DeFi and tokenised securities. Eligible startups could be those valued under $5 million in their first four years, and entrepreneurs may raise up to $75 million through qualifying crypto investment contracts.

QWhen does the article suggest a crypto token might no longer be treated as a security under the proposed rules?

AAccording to the article, once developers are no longer the driving force behind a crypto project, the token would no longer be treated as a security. Additionally, once a project's developers have finished all work promised to investors, the token should step outside the SEC's securities rules.

QWhat is the potential consequence if the CLARITY Act does not pass by August 2026?

AIf the CLARITY Act does not pass by August 2026, it is unlikely to become law in 2026 due to approaching midterm elections, which would leave the SEC's own rulemaking as the primary framework governing U.S. crypto markets.

Leituras Relacionadas

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

Collateral Dollars: How Does a "Second Layer of Dollars" Form on Top of Stablecoins? Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollar functions, expanding the offshore dollar system. However, stablecoins primarily replace specific functions like operational dollar balances for settlement. They do not inherently create new dollar credit; they substitute existing claims. The key question is: what happens when financial intermediaries use stablecoins as collateral to create a new layer of dollar-denominated claims? This "collateral dollar" channel operates through secured lending, not direct money creation. A money-like event only occurs when a liability issued against the controlled stablecoin is funded, rolled over, or accepted at near-par value by another balance sheet. The discount (haircut) prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility to bank dollars." Elasticity stems not from the stablecoin itself but from the liability issued against it and the willingness of third-party balance sheets to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Compared to the traditional Eurodollar system—where elasticity originates from bank deposit creation—the stablecoin collateral chain is structurally different. Eurodollar deposits are credit-expansive from inception. Stablecoins are initially substitutive; elasticity emerges later if an intermediary's liability against them gains monetary acceptance. Stablecoins disrupt specific tiers of the offshore dollar system, mainly replacing operational settlement balances. They do not replace the need for full dollar balance-sheet capacity (credit lines, hedging, maturity transformation). For systemic impact, the second-layer liability must pass three tests: transferability, funding capacity, and monetary acceptance (being fundable or held at par by others). Pressure transmission also differs. In the Eurodollar system, stress moves up a hierarchy of claims. In a stablecoin collateral chain, the second-layer liability can lose its money-like status well before the underlying stablecoin faces a run, often triggered by haircut increases and margin calls that create a dynamic spiral of falling token prices and rising discounts. In conclusion, the "collateral dollar" is not the stablecoin itself. It is the second-layer liability issued against a controlled token balance that is willing to be funded and maintained at near-par value. Its existence depends on that liability surviving the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity."

marsbitHá 1h

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片