大牛市要来了布局5种加密货币下半年飙升100倍

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-22Última atualização em 2024-08-22

币界网报道:

行情分析:

从目前行情走势可以看到就大盘涨幅会比较多,而且已经走出箱体,短期大盘会在60000-63000区间在走,以太短期还会继续日线级别震荡,暂时在2520-2700区间再走,sol也差不多,短期整体会在139-148区间在走

个人观点:

大盘对比以太和sol走势来看,目前还处于箱体区域横盘中,接下来短期先看大盘是否能站稳6w附近,同时以太和sol看这几天会不会补涨一波上来,我们耐心等待就可以了。

其次重点关注老美讲话,虽然市场有各种声音和各种猜测,认为9月会降息,而具体是降多少,我们还不清出,所以具体还得等官方切确的消息,到时候波动就会比较大。

有关注新闻的家人们应该知道,昨天门头沟又有情况,不过整体来说已经被市场消化差不多了,目前市场情绪也很理性了,不像之前那么恐慌和敏感了。

aad045a826d333d1746080ed88f44dc4.png

市场从恐慌中走出!布局5种加密货币下半年飙升100倍!

1.BRETT

在经历了过去一个月的看跌情绪交易后,Brett 的价格在过去 24 小时内上涨超过 20%。凭借 24 小时交易量 9403.7 万美元以及市值 8.9559 亿美元,这款 meme 币在全球加密货币排行榜上位居第 69 位。技术指标 MACD 在 1 日时间范围内呈现持续平线状态。不过,BRETT 价格图表中的平均线记录了看涨收敛,表明市场对该 meme 代币的情绪喜忧参半。若市场能将 Brett memecoin 价格维持在支撑位之上,多头将准备测试其阻力位 0.12285 美元。

b89f2e76f3bbdf02bac5bf2b0690a46a.png

2.WIF

随着看涨态势复苏,Dogwifhat 的价格在过去一天飙升了 14.98%,交易量达 4.01144 亿美元。尽管过去一个月出现了 37.69% 的回调,但这款 memecoin 的年初至今回报率为 930.15%,回馈了长期投资者。RSI 指标在 WIF 价格图中呈现看涨上涨态势,表明购买压力增加。相反,EMA 50/200 日线显示出很高的死亡交叉可能性,凸显了未来价格走势的不确定性。假设多头重新积聚力量,那么WIF价格将在未来一段时间内向其阻力位2.10 美元推进。

756c18daf17c9a4b0f28b70cdef68a0a.png

3.FLOKI

Floki 价格持续在看涨氛围中交易,过去一天上涨 10.89%,过去一周上涨 3.27%。凭借 247.09% 的年度涨幅,其稳居第 56 位,市值达 12.07 亿美元。简单移动平均线(SMA)在 1 日时间范围内即将记录看涨交叉,显示市场购买压力增加。此外,MACD 在绿色直方图中持续上升,其平均值记录正交叉。若多头继续发力,Floki 价格将突破其阻力位 0.000155 美元,迈向其上限 0.00021435 美元。

77ed8d3256bf63302720fbaed0e4f3da.png

4.JUP

JUP 正在市场中掀起波澜,这款山寨币专注于数据安全和隐私保护,利用区块链技术确保机密性。随着数据安全需求的增加,JUP 的独特优势显得尤为突出。在有利的市场条件下,JUP 展现出强大的扩张潜力,是山寨币季节中值得关注的投资机会。

265b4c1afccd255d057dbccbbae53660.png

5.NOT

Notcoin 以其白手起家而闻名。该代币在进入加密货币市场后声名鹊起。NOT 的价格目前接近关键支撑位,该支撑位在过去曾为该代币带来价格飙升。回顾过去的价格走势,我们发现,每当 NOT 交易价格接近 0.09 美元至 0.011 美元时,其平均涨幅通常为 10%。 最终,此举将为 Notcoin 生态系统注入新的可见性,吸引人们对该项目的迫切关注。投资者应密切关注该代币在未来几个月的进展,因为其战略的下一阶段可能会释放额外的流动性。

5392bfe8cc2a8fe63e75a5c030bf74fd.png

Leituras Relacionadas

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbitHá 15m

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbitHá 15m

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbitHá 24m

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitHá 24m

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHá 2h

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片