CySEC全面修订数字登机规则,与欧盟标准相协调

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-15Última atualização em 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

塞浦路斯监管机构CySEC上周发布了一份“关于通过电子方式加强非面对面客户入职流程的政策声明”。

该声明与欧盟规范和技术进步相一致,值得欢迎。它删除了不必要的具体安排,转而采用更平衡、更实质的方法。强调的要素包括技术中立性、风险管理、GDPR和信息安全。

我相信,这一新的重点将允许更全面的入职流程,使公司能够更有效、更正确地利用现有技术。这不仅会带来更好的合规性,还会改善客户体验。

为什么?

随着技术的进步,监管也在进步。与其他高净值行业一样,金融服务业受到严格监管,以帮助遏制非法行为和操纵。每种资产类别都有自己的一套协议,以打击各自形式的滥用。在外汇领域,监管由多个司法管辖区的当局承担,尽管最终缺乏具有约束力的国际秩序。谁是行业领先的监管机构?监管机构,如英国金融行为监管局(与任何其他高净值行业一样,金融服务业受到严格监管,以帮助遏制非法行为和操纵。每种资产类别都有自己的一套协议,以打击各自形式的滥用行为。在外汇领域,监管由多个司法管辖区的当局承担,尽管最终缺乏具有约束力的国际秩序。谁是该行业的主要监管机构?监管机构,例如英国金融行为管理局(阅读本术语)。该声明是几个过程的高潮,其中包括CySEC 2020年10月的咨询文件CP-02-2020和EBA 2023年10月关于远程客户入职解决方案的指导方针。

它还考虑了通过CySEC的创新中心获得的经验,这是一项重要举措,因为它使监管流程中的关键参与者RegTechs成为与监管机构进行信息和思想交流的直接途径。

谁?

该声明适用于CySEC监管的各种义务实体(OE),从投资公司和UCIT到AIFM和CASP。

什么?

塞浦路斯证券交易委员会(CySEC)是塞浦路斯的一个金融监管机构。CySEC是欧洲券商的主要监管机构之一,其金融监管和运营符合欧洲MiFID金融协调法。CySEC成立于2001年,在为外汇经纪商和以前的二元期权提供商提供许可和注册方面发挥了重要作用。CySEC负责各种不同的职能,其中包括监督塞浦路斯证券交易委员会(CySEC)是塞浦路斯的金融监管机构。CySEC是欧洲券商的主要监管机构之一,其金融监管和运营符合欧洲MiFID金融协调法。CySEC成立于2001年,在为外汇经纪商和以前的二元期权提供商提供许可和注册方面发挥了重要作用。CySEC负责各种不同的职能,其中包括监督。阅读附件一所附的本术语AMLD——涵盖与客户入职相关的两个方面:

1.远程客户入职解决方案(RCOS)的选择。

2.入职流程本身。

关于RCOS的选择,声明:

    明确运营商需要根据基于风险的方法为非面对面客户入职(NFTF)选择RCOS。它允许OE以“技术中立”的方式使用RCOS,并允许使用eIDAS法规范围之外的RCOS。明确了持续监控OE和RCOS之间业务关系的必要性。不再需要提交声明性证明,只需要通知。

关于入职流程本身,该声明澄清:

    视频通话不再是唯一符合条件的入职方式。NFTF客户接受的文件类型不再是护照,PRADO包含的文件在通过动态自拍/视频通话进行身份识别时也不再是排他性的。仅对于无人值守的解决方案,活体检测是强制性的。RCOS不仅适用于自然人,也适用于其他法律实体,包括代表其行事的自然人。识别程序不再需要通过一个设备进行。当使用生物识别解决方案时,不再需要仅通过短信传递唯一号码。地址可以通过RCOS收集原始文件的副本进行验证。

什么时候?

经修订的《塞浦路斯证券交易委员会反洗钱法》自《塞浦路斯官方公报》公布之日起生效。该声明的新RCOS相关规则将于2024年12月1日生效。

值得注意

    该声明包括对各种与入职相关的考虑因素的广泛概述,包括来自EBA指南的考虑因素。它强调GDPR合规性和信息安全。重点放在客户风险评估上,包括地理风险。在此背景下,CySEC表示,OE应“评估来自其他司法管辖区的NFTF客户使用其服务的原因”,这可以被视为实施ESMA关于跨境投资活动监管建议的一部分。

Leituras Relacionadas

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbitHá 27m

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

marsbitHá 27m

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手Há 1h

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手Há 1h

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHá 2h

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHá 2h

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手Há 2h

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手Há 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片