Coinbase谴责美国证券交易委员会的“非理性”规则制定,DEX是否受到威胁?

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-13Última atualização em 2024-08-13

币界网报道:

Coinbase向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交了第三封信,讨论了对定义的拟议修改。这家美国最大的交易所对监管机构扩大“交易所”定义的提议表示担忧

Coinbase认为,委员会缺乏足够的数据来进行准确的成本效益分析,而是依赖于有缺陷的推理。加密货币平台敦促美国证券交易委员会撤回该提案,并在继续进行之前进行彻底研究。

Coinbase抨击SEC的“交易所”定义

Coinbase首席法务官Paul Grewal在一篇X帖子中宣布,该交易所已开始对美国证券交易委员会的“交易所”定义进行审查。他表示,该委员会缺乏批判性分析,也没有断言存在任何需要监管的问题。

他提到,美国证券交易委员会未能收集到一些基本信息,也没有对该提案对去中心化交易所(DEX)的影响进行任何经济分析。据称,监管机构正在推行其非理性的假设。

在Coinbase提交的信中,Grewal批评了美国证券交易委员会提出的规则变更,强调根据《行政程序法》和1934年《交易法》,成本效益分析是强制性的。

Coinbase的首席法律官建议,美国证券交易委员会应拒绝将拟议的规则扩展到DEX,因为这可能会给数百万从事数字资产的美国人带来严重后果。然而,他也暗示了这可能对不断增长的DEX市场的创新带来的危害。

Grewal呼吁委员会努力证明市场上存在这个问题。美国证券交易委员会从一个假设开始,即该行业存在一些需要纠正的问题。这封信表明,监管机构没有提供一个真实世界的例子,说明DEX伤害了谁,以及拟议规则将如何纠正这种具体伤害。他指出,这不是制定规则的方式,该提案需要撤回和纠正。

Coinbase批评监管机构的努力

Coinbase正在向美国最大的金融监管机构提交关于数字资产规则制定政策的背对背建议。早些时候,它反对CFTC提出的预测市场规则,并辩称这些规则超出了该机构的法定权限。

Grewal批评了提案中“游戏”的宽泛定义。他建议,它可能会不公正地禁止某些活动合同,并敦促CFTC撤回该提案,使其与CEA保持一致。在最近的一项举措中,该交易所还解决了委员会拒绝提供其对数字资产及其自身监管范围的不一致观点的完整记录的问题。

Leituras Relacionadas

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Decentralized Reasoning: Beyond the Hype, a Key to Breaking AI's Centralized Monopoly A future scenario where a powerful AI model is banned by a major government illustrates the core value proposition of decentralized AI: resistance to censorship. The core bet of decentralized inference networks is mitigating this risk, with other benefits like cost being secondary. The path is extremely difficult, involving four key challenges: 1. **Running Massive Models:** Distributing a single model across a decentralized GPU swarm requires sophisticated techniques like pipeline and speculative decoding to overcome crippling network latency, aiming for usable speeds (e.g., 30-40 tokens/second). 2. **Proving Model Integrity:** Verifying that a node runs the correct model is critical. Solutions range from cryptographically secure but slow ZKML to faster, economically-secure methods like statistical fingerprints, deterministic re-execution, or live-weight proofs, each involving trade-offs between integrity, latency, and cost. 3. **Ensuring Prompt Privacy:** Simply sharding a model does not protect user inputs from nodes. Robust solutions currently require trusted hardware (TEEs) or advanced cryptography (FHE), which are not yet widely deployed in consumer swarms. 4. **Building a Real Market:** Identifying the ideal customer is tough. Beyond speculative AI agents, the viable market currently consists of startups embedding AI and projects needing batch processing (e.g., synthetic data generation), where decentralized aggregation can be an advantage over low-latency needs. The article analyzes several projects tackling these problems, such as Dolphin Network (live-weight proofs), Inference.net (statistical verification), Morpheus (TEE-based), and Darkbloom (Apple Secure Enclave). It provides a framework: decentralization is a "tax" for latency-sensitive applications (e.g., chat) but a potential supply-side advantage for throughput-oriented tasks (e.g., batch processing). The long-term vision is a closed data loop where decentralized inference generates valuable data (traces, preferences) to feed decentralized training networks, which in turn produce better open-weight models for the inference networks. A due diligence checklist advises focusing on projects that: are truly decentralized at specific layers; have a credible integrity method; offer real cost benefits; ensure genuine privacy; handle node reliability; have paying users; and are built by teams with deep AI expertise. The ultimate goal should be products that appeal beyond the crypto-native audience, using crypto mechanisms invisibly to deliver better cost, performance, or privacy.

Foresight NewsHá 16m

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Foresight NewsHá 16m

The Final Piece of Franklin Templeton's Crypto Ambition

Franklin Templeton Completes Crypto Ambition with Acquisition of 250 Digital On June 22, Franklin Templeton announced the acquisition of 250 Digital and established Franklin Crypto, a new division focused on actively managed cryptocurrency strategies for institutional investors. The unit is led by Christopher Perkins and Seth Ginns. This acquisition marks a key piece in Franklin Templeton's multi-year crypto strategy, which began in 2018 with a digital assets team. The firm's crypto product suite now spans three layers: tokenized funds like the blockchain-based money market fund BENJI (~$831M AUM); a series of passive ETFs including Bitcoin (EZBC, ~$368M), Ethereum (EZET), XRP (XRPZ, ~$252M), Solana (SOEZ), and a multi-crypto index fund (EZPZ); and the newly added active management strategies from Franklin Crypto. The company has also expanded its crypto ecosystem through investments in projects like Ethena and Crossmint, and collaborations with blockchains such as Aptos and Sui. With approximately $18B in digital asset AUM and a total firm AUM of ~$1.78T, Franklin Templeton is positioning itself as a comprehensive crypto asset manager for pensions and sovereign wealth funds. In contrast, competitor Fidelity Investments has taken a different path, focusing early on building its own custody and trading infrastructure. Fidelity's Bitcoin ETF (FBTC) holds over $11B, significantly larger than Franklin Templeton's equivalent offering. Both giants' moves underscore the deepening trend of traditional finance entering the crypto space.

Foresight NewsHá 39m

The Final Piece of Franklin Templeton's Crypto Ambition

Foresight NewsHá 39m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片