超6000万人收听,特朗普与马斯克的Space对谈都聊了些什么?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-08-13Última atualização em 2024-08-13

Resumo

两个多小时的对谈跑出了寿命20分钟的meme币。

编者按:

今日上午,马斯克与美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普在 X 平台上进行了一场 Space 对谈,对谈持续了两个多小时,X 界面显示最多有 120 万人在线,而马斯克在 Space 中表示有超 6000 万人收听,Space 对人数的显示有限制。

对谈期间,因为马斯克一直习惯性用「yeah」回应特朗普,新上线的 meme 币 YEAH 在 20 分钟内市值突破 200 万美元,但在之后迅速下跌。

在这场 Space 中,马斯克先是解释了推特遭遇了大规模服务器网络攻击,然后从特朗普遇刺未遂开始聊起,谈到了非法移民、边境安全、经济挑战、全球安全等各种社会政治问题。对谈没有提到加密货币行业发展问题,但谈到了美国现任政府需要加强对人工智能产业的重视。BlockBeats 将 Space 对谈重点简要总结如下:

特朗普谈刺杀事件


特朗普详细描述了他所经历的一次暗杀未遂事件,称这一经历既不愉快又超现实。当时他耳朵受伤,出血较多,但在那种情况下,伤势已算是最好的结果。让他躲过致命一击的是一张「非法移民图表」,当子弹发射时,他因为看向这张图表而转头,避免了更严重的伤害。这张图表通常只在演讲的结尾阶段使用,但这次在演讲开头被放置在右侧展示,意外地救了他的命。

一名特勤局狙击手在约 400 码外击毙了枪手。然而,当地警察和安全部队之间的协调不力,使得枪手能够登上屋顶,给安全带来了隐患。尽管如此,特勤局表现得非常勇敢,一名特工在危急时刻跳到特朗普身上进行保护,确保了他的安全。同时,现场的群众也未发生踩踏等混乱情况,这在类似事件中非常罕见。

移民问题

特朗普表示,在其任期内,非法移民数量达到了历史最低点,这得益于「留在墨西哥」和「在墨西哥抓捕后释放」等有效政策。然而,现任政府取消了这些政策,导致非法移民数量激增,对美国的安全构成了威胁。特朗普强调了支持合法移民和关闭非法移民通道的必要性,批评当前政府在边境安全方面不够强硬,允许未经审查的非法移民进入美国,进而引发了一系列犯罪问题。特朗普还表示,某些国家如委内瑞拉甚至向美国输送罪犯,以减轻其国内的犯罪压力。

通过在德克萨斯州鹰关的亲身观察,特朗普目睹了大量移民跨越边境,许多移民看起来并不友好,且来自世界各地,不仅限于墨西哥。他警告,开放边境可能会导致多达 5000 万到 6000 万移民涌入,这对美国将是不可持续的。

为应对非法移民问题,特朗普宣布了美国历史上最大规模的驱逐行动计划,并表示当前有国家正在向美国输送非生产性人口和罪犯。此外,特朗普批评现任民主党领导人的无能,认为他们未能对全球独裁者形成有效威慑,导致了一系列全球性问题。特朗普强调,与普京和金正恩等全球领导人保持良好关系对于维持全球稳定至关重要。

美国经济问题

特朗普表示,美国目前正面临严峻的经济挑战,包括通货膨胀显著增加和能源价格大幅上涨,这些问题使得许多家庭难以负担日常生活开支。他将这些经济困境归咎于现任政府的政策,特别是其不可持续的能源政策,认为这些政策加剧了当前的经济困难。

在国防和政府效率方面,特朗普强调了他在任内对军队的重建,认为这是保障国家安全的关键。他提到自己通过谈判削减了空军一号的成本 16 亿美元,并主张成立一个政府效率委员会,以确保纳税人的资金得到合理使用。此外,他批评现任政府的过度支出和缺乏明智的法规管理,认为这些是导致通货膨胀的主要原因。

特朗普还提出了一系列应对措施,包括通过增加石油开采来降低能源价格,并警告现任政府在应对人工智能发展带来的能源需求方面准备不足。他还呼吁继续推进放松管制,减少不必要的法规,同时改革教育体系,将教育控制权移交给各州,以提高教育质量和效率。这些措施,他认为,对于促进经济复苏至关重要。

能源问题

特朗普还谈到了气候变化问题,他对气候变化持温和态度,主张在不妖魔化石油和天然气行业的情况下,推动可持续能源的发展,同时认识到化石燃料的必要性。他认为核能作为安全电力来源被低估了,值得重新考虑,而核扩散则是一个重大担忧,需要强有力的领导来防止。关于福岛核事故,特朗普表示,加州对核安全的担忧被夸大了,并提到向福岛捐赠了一个太阳能水处理系统以支持核安全改进。

现任政府

特朗普批评现任政府在多个方面的表现。他指责拜登政府利用法律诉讼和地方检察官对政治对手进行前所未有的打压,并对拜登的身体和精神健康表示担忧,同时批评卡马拉·哈里斯的极左政策和过往记录。他还表示,欧盟在贸易上利用美国,美国在北约中承担了不成比例的费用,并对乌克兰局势和财政贡献提出了讨论。

在技术进步方面,特朗普提到了一些潜在项目,如月球基地、火星任务和城市高速连接,同时强调了拉斯维加斯隧道项目的进展和对先进交通系统的需求。他还讨论了监管改革,批评 FDA 药物审批流程过于缓慢,强调「尝试权」立法的成功。

特朗普还对美国的安全和犯罪现状提出批评,指责骚乱和移民犯罪导致民众感到不安全,并表示暴力罪犯常常被无保释释放,而他本人却受到起诉。他认为这种不公正还导致了纽约正在失去企业。

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight NewsHá 7m

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight NewsHá 7m

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报Há 11m

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报Há 11m

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbitHá 19m

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbitHá 19m

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbitHá 33m

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 33m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片