Web3的最佳项目正在成为行业最大的投资者

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-12Última atualização em 2024-08-12

币界网报道：

Web3项目在第一季度筹集了19亿美元，资金流入了300多家企业的金库，其中包括DeFi和GameFi应用程序、发射台、基础设施项目和RWA协议。

虽然A16z、Pantera Capital和Galaxy Ventures等财力雄厚的风险投资公司负责大部分投资，但成功的项目本身就是在写支票，以推动各个领域的创新。

Web3玩家投资创新

无论是赠款计划、黑客马拉松还是传统的股权交易，Web3协议都采取了积极主动的方法，将一定比例的资源分配给有前途的概念和有才华的创始人。

以加密银行Xend Finance为例，该银行由币安和谷歌Launchpad共同支持。该平台的存在理由是真实世界资产，于7月31日推出了RWA黑客马拉松，旨在奖励在其原生资产链上构建的项目。虽然价值300万美元的投资已经摆在桌面上，但Xend还为开发者提供了各种现金奖励。黑客马拉松将持续到10月3日。

然后是Uniswap基金会，这是领先的去中心化交易所（DEX）Uniswap背后的非营利组织。第一季度，基金会承诺提供434万美元的新赠款，并从4141万美元的庞大国库中支付了279万美元的先前承诺赠款。

根据基金会的说法，其资助计划旨在“创建一个由开发人员、研究人员和治理贡献者组成的持久生态系统”，最终目标是定义“DeFi最重要协议的未来”

第三层区块链项目Orbs是另一个本身既是平台又是连续投资者的项目。Orbs将CeFi级别的执行引入DeFi平台，以提供卓越的链上交易体验，并进行了大量投资，特别是在利用其四种核心产品之一的项目上。

其中包括Liquidity Hub，一个用于DEX的去中心化优化层，Perpetual Hub，一套用于基于意图的链上永久期货交易的服务，以及dTWAP和dLIMIT，它们是允许DEX执行高级CeFi级别订单的协议。

多个整合上述一项或多项的项目已获得Orbs的战略投资，其中包括Fenix Finance，一家基于Blast网络的DEX，以及基于BNB Chain的交易所Thena，这两家公司都集成了Liquidity Hub，以获得更深层次的跨链流动性。

L3项目还向SYMMIO投资了100万美元，SYMMIO是一个衍生品结算层，帮助Orbs与IntentX一起开发了Perpetual Hub。有趣的是，IntentX——一个去中心化的链上场外衍生品交易所——去年也从Orbs获得了资金。

很容易看出为什么Orbs正在对有助于推广其技术的项目进行战略投资，而这一活动在Web3中有很多先例。我们只需要看看大型区块链，其中许多区块链都有自己的专用基金会和金库，专门用来说服开发人员在他们的网络上进行构建。

举个例子，以太坊支持计划为以太坊社区内的项目和实体（特别是开源项目）提供财务和非财务支持，目标是加速生态系统的增长。去年，它启动了不到500个项目，总价值超过6100万美元！

随着比特币现货ETF等监管突破，Web3空间吸引了机构投资者越来越多的关注，看看12个月后的筹资曲线会是什么样子，这将是一件有趣的事情。无论发生什么，一部分健康的投资肯定会继续来自内部。

Leituras Relacionadas

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbitHá 9m

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbitHá 9m

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

On June 21, Jaredfromsubway.eth, one of Ethereum's most active MEV bots, suffered a sophisticated honeypot attack, losing over $7.5 million in crypto assets. Attackers deployed a complex contract system, including a coordinator, trigger, and fake token/pair contracts, to exploit the bot's arbitrage logic. The core attack trick involved baiting the bot with transactions: small trades appeared normal and consumed token approvals, while larger trades preserved these approvals by using fake swaps. This left the bot with large, unused approvals for assets like USDC, USDT, and WETH. The attacker then drained these approvals in a final step. The stolen funds—$2.87M USDC, $2.04M USDT, and 1,474 WETH—were consolidated and partially laundered through Tornado Cash. This incident highlights that MEV bots must not rely solely on simulated profits for security. Extra caution is required with unfamiliar contracts or custom wrappers in arbitrage paths, and post-transaction allowance checks are strongly recommended.

marsbitHá 36m

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

marsbitHá 36m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

As the era of channel-driven growth ends, major tech giants like Coinbase, Stripe, and Kraken are vertically integrating by acquiring or building core infrastructure, capturing profits from underlying protocols. For instance, Coinbase leverages its Base blockchain to earn sequencing fees from protocols like Morpho, while Stripe acquired Bridge to internalize stablecoin yields, and Kraken bought NinjaTrader for derivatives licenses. This trend creates a power imbalance: entities controlling distribution channels can extract value from open-source DeFi protocols. However, protocols are developing a defense through multi-chain expansion. Examples like Morpho (with significant TVL on Ethereum and Base) and Uniswap (dominant across many chains) show that by deploying across multiple blockchains, protocols reduce dependency on any single chain operator, making them costly and risky to replace. The article argues that the future landscape will be shaped by the race between institutional vertical integration and protocol horizontal, multi-chain scaling. Protocols that embed themselves deeply across ecosystems and become indispensable due to high switching costs are most likely to survive and thrive amidst this consolidation.

Foresight NewsHá 54m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

Foresight NewsHá 54m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHá 1h

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHá 1h

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHá 1h

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow