Tyler Winklevoss警告称,美国的加密货币行业将走向灭亡

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-09Última atualização em 2024-08-09

币界网报道:
    美联储已对加密货币友好的客户银行采取执法行动。Tyler Winklevoss认为此举是拜登-哈里斯政府“窒息点行动2.0”的延伸。

加密货币市场对重新启动的“窒息点行动2.0”发出了警报。这一警告是在美联储起诉加密货币友好型银行Customer Bancorp后发出的。

Gemini联合创始人Tyler Winklevoss在评论这一更新时表示,“窒息点2.0行动”正在进行中,并称Kamala Harris的加密货币“重置”是一个“骗局”

“今天,美联储证实,阻塞点2.0行动仍在全面展开,提供了有关其工作原理的宝贵见解,并证实哈里斯加密货币“重置”是一个骗局。”

对于不熟悉的人来说,Operation Choke Point 2.0指的是美国监管机构限制加密货币公司获得银行服务的行为。

限制主要银行从事加密货币托管业务的SAB 121也是Operation Choke Point 2.o的一部分

客户银行接受审查

在8月8日发布的执法行动中,美联储指示客户银行在加入任何加密货币公司之前提前30天通知。

在该命令中,美联储指控客户银行在反洗钱(AML)合规方面存在“重大缺陷”,特别是在其数字资产战略方面。

Tyler Winklevoss表示,该命令意味着美联储是银行服务和加密货币公司之间的唯一看门人。

他补充说,如果这种情况持续四年,将扼杀美国加密货币行业。

“Chokepoint 2.0行动仍然活跃。拜登-哈里斯政府的恐怖统治仍在继续。如果这种情况再持续4年,美国的加密货币行业将灭亡。”

加密货币高管和白宫顾问最近的一次会议也表明,他们对政策变化缺乏承诺。这可能会加剧人们的恐惧。

与此同时,在预测网站Polymarket上,支持加密货币的候选人特朗普赢得美国大选的几率已降至48%。

本周早些时候,特朗普和哈里斯在获胜几率上势均力敌。在撰写本文时,哈里斯以49%领先,而特朗普获胜的几率为48%。

如果说有什么不同的话,数据显示哈里斯的潜在胜利是不可能的。

如果她获胜,民主党人的执法行动可能会延伸到新政府,正如文克尔沃斯所捕捉到的那样,

“美联储目前表现最佳,因为选举即将到来。如果哈里斯在11月获胜,手套就会脱下。”

Leituras Relacionadas

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbitHá 5h

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbitHá 5h

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbitHá 8h

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbitHá 8h

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbitHá 10h

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbitHá 10h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片