收益远低于预期，一文复盘Friend.Tech空投事件

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-05-06Última atualização em 2024-05-06

Resumo

空投收益远低预期，且分配过于“集中”，空投最大接收者快速清仓，因故障问题，部分用户的空投一度无法领取。

原文编译：Felix, PANews

基于 Base 的去中心化社交平台 Friend.Tech 成为五一假期间的热点话题， 5 月 3 日，其推出了V2版本，同时还空投了原生代币 FRIEND。宣布空投后，本将上演一场为项目带来一波热度与好感的空投盛宴，但却引发加密社区一众嘲讽。DexScreener 数据显示，FRIEND 上线后暴跌近 98% ，一度从 169 美元左右急速下跌至 3.26 美元附近，另据 CMC 数据，上线后最低跌至 0.8 美元，随后攀升，目前暂报 2.53 美元。本文带你回顾 Friend.Tech 空投事件的来龙去脉。

空投收益远低预期，且分配过于“集中”

FRIEND 上线空投后，一些分析师对分配机制进行了批评，声称创作者相比散户投资者获得了更多的代币分配。加密分析平台 DYOR 的创始人 Hitesh Malviya 表示，此次分配是一次“集中空投”。

“大多数用户获得的空投比他们预期的少 10 倍，因此他们甚至没有领取空投，因为对于大多数散户投资者来说，空投的金额还不到 200 美元。与此同时，很少有人最终获利颇丰，所以这是一个非常集中的空投案例。”

空投最大接收者快速清仓，部分用户甚至无法领取

Friend.Tech 上最大的空投接收者在空投后几小时内就售出了所有代币，引发了对市场的担忧。区块链数据显示，最大的鲸鱼“Murphys 1 d”在空投上线几个小时后，售出了超过 5.5 万枚 FRIEND 代币，导致价格最初下跌约 50% 。巨鲸的抛售引发市场恐慌性抛售，引起进一步下跌。

在此期间，一些用户抱怨 API 出现故障，导致无法在价格下跌时领取代币。加密交易员 Luke Martin 在 X 平台表示：“我不断刷新页面试图领取，眼看着我的空投的价值在 2 小时内从 7 位数降到了 5 位数，但无法领取”。

研究人员0x Cygaar指出，流量激增导致 Friend.Tech 的后端超载，而且显然没有采取任何扩展措施。用于检查用户资格的证明也出现故障，甚至出现了一些通过浏览器 BaseScan 手动从合约中领取空投的教程。

即使是那些成功领取代币的人也颇有怨言，其价格在不到四个小时内从 2.78 美元跌至 1.49 美元，暴跌了 46% 。社区认为，FRIEND 除了在 BunnySwap 上交易外不可转移，开发人员仅增加 0.01 美元的流动性是其价格如此迅速下跌的主要因素。

Club 功能也遭质疑

Friend.Tech 最初于 2023 年 8 月推出，仅提供奖励积分系统的邀请服务，V2版本引入了 Money Club、新积分系统等新功能。Money Club 将为用户提供专属的金融讨论和交流空间，而新的积分系统则是为了奖励用户在平台上的贡献和互动。

但 Club 功能也受到了一些用户的批评。一方面为了给 Club 功能引流，在空投设计中，每个用户只有 10% 的空投可直接领取，获得全额空投需要加入“Money Club”，以及在v2上关注 10 位用户。而软件也有一些 bug，如有用户报告新创建的 Club 没有显示。此外，Friend.Tech 也不忘默默恰饭，以太坊投资者@eric.eth指出，Friend.Tech v2在应用程序中集成了自己的交易所（RabbitRouter + BunnySwap），收取 1.5% 的交易费。

Dune数据显示，自 5 月 4 日发布V2以来，Club 数已达 112, 346 个，总交易额达 16, 899, 404 FRIEND，Club 费用达 252, 651 FRIEND。

收益远低于预期，一文复盘Friend.Tech空投事件

值得一提的是，尽管 Friend.Tech 代币上线后表现“不佳”，但仍有巨鲸盈利。据 Lookonchain 5 月 5 日监测，FRIEND 前 5 大买家已累计浮盈 289 万美元。

此外，据 The Data Nerd监测， 3 天前，一位聪明的投资者0x A 26 花费了 118 万美元，以平均入场费 1.61 美元累积了 73.2 万枚 FRIEND，目前未实现利润约为 80.7 万美元。

尽管存在争议，Friend.Tech 目前仍是Web3社交媒体领域的重要参与者，至于未来能否继续引领 SocialFi 新浪潮，一起拭目以待。

原文编译

Leituras Relacionadas

Don't Just Focus on Layoffs, The New Structure of the Ethereum Foundation is More Worthy of Appreciation

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has undergone a significant organizational restructuring, with the most notable change being a strategic refocusing of its priorities rather than just a 20% staff reduction (approximately 54 people). The new structure clearly prioritizes the Protocol and Access layers, which now comprise the largest teams (57 and 34 people, respectively). This signals EF's intent to concentrate its core resources on fundamental, hard-to-outsource aspects of Ethereum: protocol evolution, security, privacy, client development, and the foundational access layer. Key areas within the Protocol layer, led by an architecture group including Vitalik Buterin and Justin Drake, receive heightened emphasis. These include post-quantum security, zkEVM, formal verification, and long-term roadmap development ("Strawmap"). This reflects a shift towards tackling complex, interdependent challenges like scalability, privacy, and future-proofing the protocol, potentially moving from a pure "redundant security" multi-client model towards more specialized clients aided by AI-assisted formal verification. Financially, EF's budget is being reduced by approximately 40%. The goal is to transition from spending about 15% of its remaining funds annually to a more sustainable 5% rate, akin to a long-term endowment, ensuring its longevity. Concurrently, the restructuring involves pushing certain responsibilities—such as application development, adoption, and ecosystem coordination—to external organizations like EthLabs, the Ethereum Apps Guild, and others. This "multi-node" model aims to increase ecosystem resilience by decentralizing functions beyond the EF, though it introduces new coordination challenges. In essence, the reorganization represents EF consciously narrowing its scope to focus on the hardest, most critical protocol-level problems while fostering a more distributed and sustainable ecosystem structure for Ethereum's future growth.

Foresight NewsHá 18m

Don't Just Focus on Layoffs, The New Structure of the Ethereum Foundation is More Worthy of Appreciation

Foresight NewsHá 18m

Report Analysis: What Is Coherent Planning as CPO Booms?

Title: Report Interpretation: What Moves Is Coherent Making Amid the CPO Boom? Summary: JP Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee reiterates an Overweight rating on Coherent (COHR), citing undervalued growth potential across three core areas: data center optical transceivers, co-packaged optics (CPO) chips, and industrial lasers/thermal management. COHR's 1.6T data center transceivers are in high demand, with pricing remaining firm. The rise of CPO is seen not as a threat but as a catalyst, creating higher demand for sophisticated optical components, an area where COHR holds a competitive edge with its comprehensive portfolio (lasers, isolators, VCSELs, thermoelectric coolers). Each CPO chip offers significantly greater revenue potential than traditional transceivers. Furthermore, its Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) technology targets a potential $4B market with reliability and power advantages. The company is expanding its InP (Indium Phosphide) device capacity fourfold within two years, securing substrate supply and transitioning to more cost-effective 6-inch wafers. As one of only two major suppliers of high-quality pump lasers—currently in severe shortage—COHR can now move up the value chain from components to complete line cards/systems, boosting ASP over tenfold. Gross margin targets (>42%) may be revised upward due to high-end product premiums, cost improvements from the wafer transition, and contributions from new high-margin products like CPO and OCS. Its efficient thermadite thermal material also offers long-term growth. Industrial segment revenue grows at a steady 5-10%, supported by semiconductor equipment orders. Changes in Apple's Face ID protocol present a re-competition opportunity for 3D sensing. Overall, Coherent is positioned as a key infrastructure provider, with AI-driven compute demand fueling the need for high-speed optical interconnectivity. Growth from CPO/OCS, stable industrial performance, and margin improvement support the bullish thesis. *Disclaimer: This summary interprets a third-party analyst report from JP Morgan. It does not constitute investment advice.*

marsbitHá 40m

Report Analysis: What Is Coherent Planning as CPO Booms?

marsbitHá 40m

Dan Koe's New Article: Escape the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive in the Tide of AI Replacement?

Dan Koe's article argues that the real threat in the AI era is not technology itself, but financial dependency on employers. He critiques the "wage slavery" of unfulfilling work and identifies five core skills for resilience: agency, taste, persuasion, persistence, and iteration. These are developed not by consuming content, but by starting your own venture. The key to escaping the "employee mindset" is a radical identity shift. This requires: 1) Drastically changing your environment and daily inputs, 2) Choosing a creative medium (like content or code) that provides real-world feedback through trial and error, and 3) Using that feedback to learn and adapt. Koe strongly advocates for content creation over coding for beginners, as it builds irreplaceable subjective taste and audience connection. The practical starting point is a 15-minute self-inquiry to define your "life's work." Answer: What do you know deeply? What innate abilities do you have? What childhood interests were suppressed? Then, identify your contrarian beliefs—what does the mainstream get wrong in your area? The overlap is your unique direction. The final, non-negotiable step is to publish your first piece of content tomorrow. Embrace that it will be bad; the goal is to enter the feedback loop of creation, learning, and iteration, which is the true path to independence.

marsbitHá 50m

Dan Koe's New Article: Escape the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive in the Tide of AI Replacement?

marsbitHá 50m

After Laying Off 20% of Staff, What Are the Key Points of EF's New Structure?

Following the completion of a months-long organizational restructuring, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced a 20% workforce reduction (approximately 54 employees) on June 23rd. It reorganized its teams into five new core clusters: Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional (plus Operations/Management support units). Officially, this move implements the EF's 2026 Mandate and 2025 Treasury Management Policy, aiming to create a more focused and "self-sovereign" organization. The restructuring prioritizes the CROPS principles—Censorship Resistance, Openness & Freedom, Privacy, and Security—as foundational organizational tenets. The Protocol cluster will focus on core protocol R&D, including MEV reduction and zkEVM. The Access cluster emphasizes preserving user "zero option" for non-custodial, permissionless interaction. The User, Community, and Institutional clusters will manage external engagement, with the latter handling institutional and regulatory matters. While offering enhanced severance and transition support for affected employees, the EF did not disclose budget allocations or specific KPIs for the new clusters. This has led to market uncertainty about the impact on project funding and development priorities. Analysts note the announcement's positive tone of mission focus contrasts with a backdrop of recent EF leadership changes and broader ecosystem pressures. The true impact—whether this signifies strategic realignment or reactive contraction—will become clearer as the new structure's resource allocation and project prioritization are revealed in the coming months.

marsbitHá 50m

After Laying Off 20% of Staff, What Are the Key Points of EF's New Structure?

marsbitHá 50m

Top-Tier MEV Bot Loses $7.5 Million: Is 'Approval' the Most Overlooked Fatal Risk On-Chain?

The article discusses a sophisticated attack on a prominent Ethereum MEV (Miner Extractable Value) bot, Jaredfromsubway.eth, resulting in a loss exceeding $7.5 million. Unlike typical exploits involving key leaks or smart contract bugs, this attack was a carefully orchestrated "reverse hunt." The attacker spent weeks deploying fake tokens and liquidity pools that mimicked legitimate assets like WETH and USDC. These pools were designed to appear as profitable arbitrage opportunities, tricking the automated bot's trading logic. During its normal operation, the bot was induced to grant ERC-20 token approvals to the malicious contracts. Once sufficient permissions were accumulated, the attacker drained the bot's funds by calling these pre-approved allowances. This incident highlights the often-underestimated risks associated with token approvals in Web3. The article explains that approvals are a fundamental mechanism, allowing smart contracts (like DEXs) to move a user's tokens on their behalf. However, risks arise from practices like granting infinite approvals, the persistence of approvals even after disconnecting from a dApp, and the potential for a once-trusted contract to become compromised later. The piece concludes with advice for managing approval risks: users should adopt the principle of least privilege (approving only the needed amount), use separate wallets for storage versus interactions, and regularly audit and revoke unnecessary approvals using tools like Revoke.cash. It also emphasizes the role of wallets like imToken in providing proactive defenses, such as risk warnings and clear, readable transaction signing interfaces, to help users make informed decisions. Ultimately, wallet security must extend beyond private key protection to include active management of token approvals.

marsbitHá 55m