Paradigm再次加仓，拿下2500万美元融资的「ParagonsDAO」是什么？

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2022-02-25Última atualização em 2022-02-25

Resumo

与其他会围绕多个热门游戏展开活动的链游社区不同，ParagonsDAO 的活动只会围绕 Parallel（注：与波卡生态 DeFi 平行链 Parallel Finance 并非同一项目）展开。

作者：Azuma
12 月 6 日，链游社区 ParagonsDAO 宣布完成 2500 万美元融资，Paradigm、Framework Ventures、Folius Ventures、Mume Ventures、Yunt Capital、HoneyDAO、County Capital、PebbleDAO、Nima Capital、Shima Group、Perceptive Capital、Coins Group、AGE Crypto、Fourth Revolution Capital、D64 Ventures、CMS Holdings、DCV Capital、Defi Dad、Santiago R Santos、Ben Lakoff、Jordan Momtazi、HedgedHog、Eden Au、Shual、Kain Warwick、DeFi God、Redphone Crypto 诸多机构参投。

与其他会围绕多个热门游戏展开活动的链游社区不同，ParagonsDAO 的活动只会围绕 Parallel（注：与波卡生态 DeFi 平行链 Parallel Finance 并非同一项目）展开。
Parallel 是一款基于科幻题材的集换式卡牌游戏（TCG），其创始成员之一为 YouTube 联合创始人 Chad Hurley，虽然游戏还没有上线，但 Parellel 早已成为了市面上最受关注的链游之一。在 Opensea 历史总交易量排行榜上，Parallel 最早释放的系列卡牌「Parallel Alpha」暂列第 15 位，历史总交易量已超过 5 万个 ETH。

值得一提的是，今年 10 月，Parallel 曾以 5 亿美元的估值获得了 Paradigm 的 5000 万美元投资，所以算上这次对 ParagonsDAO 的投资，这家顶级风投机构已是第二次加仓 Parallel 游戏生态。
说回 ParagonsDAO，这是一个由投资者、玩家、收藏者等不同角色共同组成，以代币 PDT 为媒介链接在一起的社区。ParagonsDAO 将通过主办赛事、赞助玩家、创作内容、促成合作等多项举措来助推 Parallel 的生态价值增长，与此同时，ParagonsDAO 也会积极参与到 Parallel 本身的治理决策中，为该游戏的发展出谋划策。
而对于普通玩家来说，ParagonsDAO 可以为他们提供一个“与巨鲸共舞”的机会。由于 Parallel 的热度高居不下，所以当前该游戏的一些稀有卡牌已相当昂贵，对于普通玩家来说入手成本过高，但如果玩家持有 PDT，其将有机会共同控制 ParagonsDAO 所拥有的一些超稀有卡牌，比如可参与 NFT 交易分红的 Masterpieces 卡片，以及可参与游戏治理的 Prime Keys 卡片。
链游无疑当前加密世界最为火热的赛道，Parallel 则是最受市场关注的链游项目之一，曾捕获了 Uniswap、MakerDAO、Compound、dYdX 等多家超级项目的 Paradigm 也是加密世界最为顶级的风头机构之一。这些“之最”叠在一起，ParagonsDAO 或将在未来释放巨大潜力。

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Leituras Relacionadas

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warns that companies relying solely on a single AI model could jeopardize their survival. He argues that over-dependence leads to "vendor lock-in," where businesses risk ceding control over their core data, memory, contextual history, and AI usage patterns. This dependence essentially outsources a company's critical thinking and operational know-how to an external provider. The deeper a company integrates with one AI system—feeding it prompts, internal data, and workflows—the more it reveals its unique business methods and competitive edge. This accumulated knowledge could become accessible to the AI supplier. Furthermore, switching providers becomes extremely costly and complex, as companies would need to rebuild their entire AI-augmented workflow, memory, and tool integrations from scratch. Nadella's solution is "decoupling." Companies should separate their proprietary data, memory, and control layer (or "harness") from the underlying AI models. By retaining metadata from every AI interaction, businesses can preserve their operational "brain" or institutional knowledge. This allows them to flexibly use different AI models (e.g., from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft) for specific tasks without losing their accumulated expertise. The core idea: companies can rent the smartest models available, but they must keep their own "brain" and operational control firmly in-house.

marsbitHá 32m

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

marsbitHá 32m

KOSPI Index Halts Trading Due to Eighth Price Limit Up Circuit Breaker Trigger of 2026

The South Korean KOSPI index has triggered a market-wide trading halt for the eighth time in 2026, falling another 8% and losing over 28% in the past month. This latest plunge is driven by a severe sell-off in semiconductor and AI-related stocks. Key contributors include a sharp decline in shares of SK Hynix (down 50% from its June high) and heavyweights like Samsung, which comprises 50% of the index. The drop followed a sector-wide weakness triggered by the IPO of Changxin Memory Technology and falling US chip stocks like Nvidia (-4.4%). Analysts point to massive AI financing deals (like Nvidia's $250B support for OpenAI) raising debt cost concerns and questioning AI scalability viability. The article notes Bitcoin's correlation with AI stocks has weakened, but KOSPI's volatility could redirect some liquidity to crypto markets. Blockchain-based exchanges are exploring KOSPI-linked perpetual futures to allow speculation on further declines or a short squeeze, as traditional altcoin trading in South Korea diminishes amid the index's dramatic swings.

cryptonews.ruHá 32m

KOSPI Index Halts Trading Due to Eighth Price Limit Up Circuit Breaker Trigger of 2026

cryptonews.ruHá 32m

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ruHá 42m

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ruHá 42m

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbitHá 47m

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbitHá 47m

Jito Seizes User Traffic with JTX, Why Is It Still Undervalued by the Market?

Jito, a Solana infrastructure provider, has launched a new product called JTX, which is shifting its business model from being a price-taker on Solana block space to becoming a price-setter for user transaction flow. Despite this strategic shift aimed at capturing and monetizing user traffic, the market continues to undervalue its native token, JTO. Analysts present a valuation case for JTO, arguing the market still prices it as backend infrastructure. Their base case scenario assumes JTX captures 15% of Solana DEX volume by Q2 2027, generating significant annualized revenue. Applying a conservative 30x P/S multiple to this revenue implies a JTO price of $1.18, representing ~57% upside from current levels (~$0.75). A probability-weighted target, including bullish (40% probability, 25% market share) and bearish (10% probability, 5% share) scenarios, points to a target of $2.75, suggesting ~267% potential upside. The thesis hinges on JTX's early positive performance data and its potential to benefit from the expected growth of on-chain trading, particularly from tokenized stocks and real-world assets. Furthermore, an estimated 80% of JTX's net revenue is slated for JTO buybacks, creating a potential value-accrual flywheel. The report concludes that Jito's transformation via JTX is not yet reflected in its valuation.

marsbitHá 59m

Jito Seizes User Traffic with JTX, Why Is It Still Undervalued by the Market?

marsbitHá 59m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar DOT

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Polkadot (DOT) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Polkadot (DOT) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Polkadot (DOT)Depois de comprar o teu Polkadot (DOT), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Polkadot (DOT)Transaciona facilmente Polkadot (DOT) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

482 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de DOT (DOT) são apresentadas abaixo.