CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-04-08Última atualização em 2024-04-09

Resumo

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle urged the need for new crypto laws on Tuesday, as Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo asked for “additional tools” to effectively crac...

  • Bipartisan senators called for a new regulatory framework for the crypto industry during a Senate Banking Committee meeting on Tuesday.
  • Republican Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) stressed that a "light" regulatory framework is needed to both prevent illicit crypto financing and help the industry grow.
  • Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo is asking Congress for increased powers to go after crypto crime.

U.S. Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said on Tuesday that the crypto industry needs a “light” regulatory framework put in place to both combat risks – including another FTX-like collapse and illicit terrorism financing – and create a “hospitable environment” in which digital assets can thrive.

The remarks came during a Senate Banking Committee meeting with Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo on Tuesday, who testified about the Treasury’s efforts to counter illicit finance, terrorism and sanctions evasion. Adeyemo also pressed the members of the Committee for “additional tools” to fight crypto crime, following legislative requests he made last November.

“One thing I’d tell people in the crypto or digital assets space that say ‘Nothing to see here, everything is fine’ – they’re wrong,” Sen. Tillis said. “There needs to be some light regulatory regimen put into place, otherwise there are risks…We want to create the most hospitable environment for digital assets to thrive. We don’t want to overreach and lose the opportunity to be that jurisdiction.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Tillis added that if there is a change of administration following the presidential election in November, the view of how to regulate crypto will be “vastly different.”

“I, for one, would like to look at the possibility of working with [the Treasury Department] to address some of the things in your punch list that we agree with, so that we may be able to get regulations on the books in this Congress that will certainly not go as far some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want to go, but [will be] far short of the wild, wild West that we find ourselves in now,” Tillis said.

On Monday, Tillis and Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) released a discussion draft of a new bill – the Ensuring Necessary Financial Oversight and Reporting of Cryptocurrency Ecosystems (ENFORCE) Act – aimed at making sure centralized cryptocurrency companies are adhering to Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti-money laundering (AML) standards.

Democratic members of the Senate Banking Committee, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sen. Mark Warner (D-Virginia) and Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) also called for more crypto regulations.

“Name your bad guy, and crypto is the way they can move money around,” Sen. Warren said.

Warren added that validators – which validate transactions on proof-of-stake blockchains – are not subject to the same anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) laws that banks are.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Stablecoins make it easier to convert dollars into crypto and crypto into dollars, so they are an onramp into the crypto world,” Warren said. “If we’re going to create new onramps…then we need a regulatory framework that will put the rules for anti-money laundering into place so that we do not have new opportunities for Iran and terrorists and drug lords and human traffickers to make more money.”

Expanded powers

During the hour-long hearing, Adeyemo maintained that the Treasury needs expanded powers to effectively crack down on illicit crypto financing.

Adeyemo told the Committee that, as the Treasury has improved its ability to cut foreign enemies – including state actors like Iran, Russia and North Korea, as well as terrorist groups like Hamas and Al-Qaeda – off from the traditional finance system, they are increasingly turning to crypto as a workaround.

He has asked Congress for three legislative reforms. First, a “secondary sanctions tool” against exchanges that facilitate illicit finance, which would “help Treasury evolve its targeting capabilities.”

Second, Adeyemo asked for an expansion of the Treasury’s reach to “explicitly cover the key players and core activities of the digital assets ecosystem.”

Lastly, he requested a reform to address the “jurisdictional risk from offshore cryptocurrency platforms,” which would allow the Treasury to “clarify that our authorities can reach extraterritorially when digital asset entities harm our national security while taking advantage of our financial system.” In addition to countering illicit financing, Adeyemo added that this reform would “ also promote a level playing field for U.S.-based VASPs.”

Edited by Aoyon Ashraf.

Leituras Relacionadas

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbitHá 7m

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbitHá 7m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHá 59m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHá 59m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHá 1h

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片