数据解读Farcaster:活跃用户人均横跨8个频道发帖

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-04-02Última atualização em 2024-04-02

Resumo

对于开始使用Farcaster的人来说,整个平台看起来和感觉就像一个大型的加密货币子论坛。

原文作者:Sid Shekhar

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

我们在过去几周看到了一个有趣的现象正在形成。Farcaster 上的频道已成为草根社区形成的中心。超过 43% 的 Farcaster 账户持有者以前从未进行过 cast(类似于推文或 Reddit 帖子)。但是 cast 过的人中,将近 70% 是在频道中进行的。本周我深入研究了频道和它们的使用的公开 cast 数据,看看数据会告诉我们什么。

Farcaster 用户平均发帖的频道数量约为 8 个!

虽然这个数字明显受到上层用户的影响(比如回复了 2000 多个频道的@degentokenbase 机器人),但对于平均水平来说,这仍然是相当大的数字!

更详细地看一下,我列出了按关注者数量排名前 15 的频道,发现其中有 7 个是“加密原生”的和/或与 Farcaster 有某种关系,另外 8 个是一般用途的非加密频道。

对于那些随着时间在多个频道进行发帖的人来说,频道使用之间的重叠情况如何?

数据解读Farcaster:活跃用户人均横跨8个频道发帖

Farcaster 上排名前 15 的频道及其用户之间的重叠情况

有几件事引人注目。首先,有四个核心频道(basedegenfarcaster和 frames),拥有大量在其中几个频道中发布的用户。另一方面,还有一些极不相关的非加密频道,例如tabletop(针对棋盘游戏玩家)和front-end以及它们自己的子社区。

多产的频道用户

如果一个平均用户在 8 个频道上发帖,它实际上是如何分布的?根据用户发布帖子的频道数量进行分类显示了这种分布:

数据解读Farcaster:活跃用户人均横跨8个频道发帖

可以理解,在如此庞大的选择清单下,选择在哪个频道发布帖子是一个相当困难的选择,所以选择 2-4 个频道进行发布是较为合适的。这就像是在餐厅的自助餐单上,你最终会出于习惯和舒适而一遍又一遍地选择相同的几道菜。

然而,有趣的是:

  • 21% 的用户根本不在频道上发帖(大部分都是第一次发帖者)

  • 近乎相同数量(19% )的用户是多产的频道用户,在 10 个或更多的频道中发帖

话题分散

那么哪些频道得到了最多的关注?

正如我们之前看到的那样,对频道进行分段的一种方法是区分“加密原生”频道和更通用的频道,如下图右侧聚类的那样。

数据解读Farcaster:活跃用户人均横跨8个频道发帖

Farcaster 频道(较大的气泡表示更多的关注者)

作为 Farcaster 上加密原生频道的新兴特征,看到它们有机地发展出高度参与的子社区是令人兴奋的。从像degen 和nouns这样的大型频道到在过去几周内涌现出来的几个较小的频道highersendit和名声在外的ticker ,许多频道都有一个同名的 meme 币或 NFT 系列可以团结起来。

虽然很难看到像 founders 或 front-end 这样的通用非加密频道围绕着代币团结起来,但可以看到在网络上每个加密原生频道都有某种类型的代币或链上资产与之相关联的可能性。

Reddit、Farcaster 和未来之路

上周,Reddit 在成立 19 年之后,拥有了数百万用户和帖子,以 70 亿美元的估值进行了 IPO 。对于互联网的某一部分来说,Reddit 是他们的事实上的“互联网首页” ,是各种内容的中心枢纽,包括新闻、讨论、意见和娱乐,全部由其用户提供和策划。Reddit 和 Farcaster 之间的相似之处已经被充分记录。

与 Farcaster 主题空间相比,Reddit 的子论坛如何?

数据解读Farcaster:活跃用户人均横跨8个频道发帖

子论坛(较大的气泡表示更多的订阅者)

除了 funny 高于其他所有子论坛之外,您可以看到广泛的通用主题范围,所有这些主题都拥有 2000 万至 3000 万的订阅者,其中许多人是在加入 Reddit 时被自动订阅的。

去年首次推出时,Farcaster 上的频道最初被描述为“去中心化的子论坛”。对于开始使用 Farcaster 的人来说,整个平台看起来和感觉就像一个大型的加密货币子论坛。然而,随着网络的增长,有趣的是看到新频道的增长,既有“加密原生”主题,也有明显更通用的主题。

Farcaster 上有超过 10 万个子论坛和接近 5000 个频道,有一些主题(比如 meme)在两者上都有大量社区。

数据解读Farcaster:活跃用户人均横跨8个频道发帖

Farcaster 上的频道(左)与 Reddit 上的子论坛(右)

随着 Farcaster 日渐成熟,可供选择的功能均衡的客户端(不仅限于 Warpcast)也在不断增加,我们将很高兴地看到哪种方式会更占主导地位,究竟是建立一个专业的、加密货币原生子社区网络,还是建立一个类似 Reddit 的、具有更广泛吸引力的通用网络。

频道,包括它们如何被管理,以及围绕它们形成的社区,将在塑造网络未来方向和身份方面发挥关键作用。随着用户不断在不同的频道之间切换,他们将共同确定定义 Farcaster 体验的社区和对话类型。

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight NewsHá 8m

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight NewsHá 8m

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报Há 12m

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报Há 12m

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbitHá 20m

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbitHá 20m

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbitHá 34m

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 34m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片