SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-03-04Última atualização em 2024-03-04

Resumo

风险资产上周持续反弹，即使又有一家区域性银行传出信贷问题，加上一位著名经济学家宣称美联储在2024年不会降息，也无法阻止上涨列车的前进。在加密货币方面，创纪录的资金仍不断通过ETF流入，正面的市场情绪似乎也蔓延到了altcoins以及memecoin。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

风险资产上周持续反弹，即使又有一家区域性银行传出信贷问题，加上一位著名经济学家宣称美联储在 2024 年不会降息，也无法阻止上涨列车的前进。根据德意志银行的数据，SPX 指数在过去 18 周中上涨了 16 周，这是自 1971 年以来从未出现过的涨势。

就在 SVB 倒闭一周年之际，纽约社区银行 (New York Community Bancorp) 管理层称，该银行发现内部贷款审查流程存在重大缺陷，导致 100% 的商誉减值（24 亿美元）以及管理团队的整顿，其股价在上周五出现暴跌。然而，与去年广泛的恐慌情绪不同，华尔街似乎认为这仅是一个个案，该股市净率（约 0.5）的疲软在很大程度上已经充分反映了这些担忧，即便 NYCB 股价在周五暴跌了 20% ，但 KBW 区域银行指数仅出现些微调整（约 0.3% ）。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

美国经济衰退遥遥无期（亚特兰大联储预估第一季度 GDP 增长约 3% ），美国消费者仍相当强劲（美国银行提到 2 月份消费者支出增长超过 3% ），就业/薪资/通胀增长保持稳定，Apollo 的首席经济学家表示，由于央行将在 2024 年大部分时间里应对通胀并保持高收益率，美联储将不会在 2024 年降息。Slok 指出，美国增长预期大幅上升，就业市场依然紧绷，核心通胀居高不下，加上金融形势过于宽松，这些因素会共同抑制宽松预期，此外，美联储从 2023 年第四季度开始的口头政策转向已经为资产价格提供了足够的推动力。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

Powell 主席将于 3 月 7 日向参议院银行委员会提供半年度货币政策更新，届时他将有机会讨论近期美国通胀数据的反弹，并就 12 月鸽派转向的理由接受质询。此外，财报季已经过去，企业盈利可观，也已反映在股票价格中，根据 Bloomberg，SPX 盈利超出季前预测的幅度有机会成为 2021 年第四季度以来最大。不断增长的盈利无疑让华尔街措手不及，策略分析师们急忙上调 SPX 年终目标，仅在过去两周内媒体就报导了超过六次的预测上调。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

与加密货币类似，散户交易活动激增，个股期权的交易量不断增加，甚至远超过 2021 年的高点，且在 NVDA 和 META 的正向盈利结果后进一步加速。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

在中国，股票与债券市场也终于迎来令人振奋的相关性变化，两种资产类别的价格终于开始同步（利率下降=债券价格上升）。中国资产是否迎来了转捩点？人民银行的宽松政策是否终于开始反映在股价上？希望正面的价格走势得以持续...

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

在加密货币方面，创纪录的资金仍不断通过 ETF 流入，正面的市场情绪似乎也蔓延到了 altcoins 以及 memecoin， SOL (+ 17% )、XPR (+ 16% )、Cardano (+ 21% ) 、Polkadot (+ 19% )、Doge (+ 7% ) 和 Shiba (+ 131% ) 在过去 7 天都在加速上涨。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

在期权方面，短天期期权需求激增，未平仓量集中在 6.5 至 7.5 万美元的水平附近。期权交易所 Deribit 上周公布了创纪录的交易量， 24 小时交易量超过 124 亿美元，未平仓量超过 270 亿美元。市场对短天期看涨期权的巨大兴趣正在推高隐含波动率，并导致期权卖方出现小型 gamma 挤压，其中大部分敞口将于 3 月 29 日到期，因此预计本月大部分时间里价格将反复波动（上下震荡），享受上涨的同时请务必谨慎管理风险。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240304)：降息预期推迟，SPX持续上涨

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ，获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新，欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ，或者加入我们的微信群（添加小助手微信：SignalPlus 123）、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群，和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website：https://www.signalplus.com

Leituras Relacionadas

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbitHá 6m

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbitHá 6m

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

On June 21, Jaredfromsubway.eth, one of Ethereum's most active MEV bots, suffered a sophisticated honeypot attack, losing over $7.5 million in crypto assets. Attackers deployed a complex contract system, including a coordinator, trigger, and fake token/pair contracts, to exploit the bot's arbitrage logic. The core attack trick involved baiting the bot with transactions: small trades appeared normal and consumed token approvals, while larger trades preserved these approvals by using fake swaps. This left the bot with large, unused approvals for assets like USDC, USDT, and WETH. The attacker then drained these approvals in a final step. The stolen funds—$2.87M USDC, $2.04M USDT, and 1,474 WETH—were consolidated and partially laundered through Tornado Cash. This incident highlights that MEV bots must not rely solely on simulated profits for security. Extra caution is required with unfamiliar contracts or custom wrappers in arbitrage paths, and post-transaction allowance checks are strongly recommended.

marsbitHá 34m

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

marsbitHá 34m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

As the era of channel-driven growth ends, major tech giants like Coinbase, Stripe, and Kraken are vertically integrating by acquiring or building core infrastructure, capturing profits from underlying protocols. For instance, Coinbase leverages its Base blockchain to earn sequencing fees from protocols like Morpho, while Stripe acquired Bridge to internalize stablecoin yields, and Kraken bought NinjaTrader for derivatives licenses. This trend creates a power imbalance: entities controlling distribution channels can extract value from open-source DeFi protocols. However, protocols are developing a defense through multi-chain expansion. Examples like Morpho (with significant TVL on Ethereum and Base) and Uniswap (dominant across many chains) show that by deploying across multiple blockchains, protocols reduce dependency on any single chain operator, making them costly and risky to replace. The article argues that the future landscape will be shaped by the race between institutional vertical integration and protocol horizontal, multi-chain scaling. Protocols that embed themselves deeply across ecosystems and become indispensable due to high switching costs are most likely to survive and thrive amidst this consolidation.

Foresight NewsHá 52m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

Foresight NewsHá 52m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHá 59m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHá 59m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHá 1h

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow