Bitcoin Favored in Human Trafficking, Child Exploitation: FinCEN Report

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-02-12Última atualização em 2024-02-13

Resumo

The Treasury's financial-crimes arm found that bitcoin was increasingly popular for use in trafficking of people and materials tied to child sexual abuse, though the data is f...

A few years ago, bitcoin (BTC) became a popular means to conduct illegal transactions to support a booming global business in the smuggling and exploitation of people, according to an analysis released Tuesday by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Based on financial firms' government filings in 2020 and 2021, that period saw an upswing in the use of crypto – most commonly bitcoin – in crimes that included human trafficking and the sexual exploitation of children, according to the trend report released by the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In those two years, the analysis found 2,311 reported uses of crypto in such crimes, amounting to more than $412 million.

10.6K

"Victims of these crimes are placed into forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude, peonage, and/or forced to engage in commercial sex acts," the report said. And the use of crypto was on a sharp rise, with 1,975 reports in 2021 eclipsing the 336 in 2020.

"Human traffickers and perpetrators of related crimes despicably exploit adults and children for financial gain," said FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki, in a statement. Financial firms flagging these cases "ultimately helps law enforcement protect and save innocent lives."

But the most recent data examined was from December 2021 – more than two years ago. That period pre-dated the crypto winter and the subsequent recovery in recent months.

A majority of the cases evaluated in this report involved the exchange of crypto for "child sexual abuse material" – typically, "CSAM" involves explicit photos and videos of children – generally over darknet marketplaces, with the use of crypto kiosks (commonly known as bitcoin ATMs) or with transactions run through mixers, FinCEN noted.

The use of crypto and the common methods of transaction have undergone some changes since that period, and crypto data firm Chainalysis noted "the scale and severity of CSAM activity peaked in 2021," according to a review published last month.

FinCEN's report suggested that some of the increase over the two-year span could have been spurred by "raised awareness and vigilance" from financial institutions informed of criminal use of cryptocurrencies.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Recommended for you:

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum Is Retracing the Path of the Internet and Linux: No One Yields, and the Neutral Party Ultimately Prevails

This article argues that Ethereum is following the historical path of open, neutral systems like the Internet and Linux, which eventually triumphed over proprietary, centrally-controlled alternatives. Major financial institutions like JPMorgan, Stripe, and Circle are building their own proprietary blockchains or networks (e.g., Tempo, Arc), but will never agree to build on a competitor's controlled infrastructure. This creates the perfect opportunity for Ethereum as the only neutral, credibly neutral settlement layer that no single entity controls. The piece draws parallels to the 1990s, when experts like Bill Gates predicted proprietary networks (from Microsoft, Oracle) would win over the open Internet, and when Sun Microsystems' Unix lost to the open-source "bazaar" development model of Linux. This model, described in Eric Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar," thrives on permissionless innovation where countless contributors improve the system, outpacing any centralized competitor. Ethereum embodies this through its decentralized development, broad validator distribution, and credible neutrality—rules that are transparent, equally applied, hard to change, and open to all. This has attracted over a million developers and major institutions like Coinbase, BlackRock, and JPMorgan, who choose Ethereum for its security, ecosystem, and sovereignty (the inability of any single party to change the rules). While proprietary chains offer initial speed and control, they inherit the downsides of both centralization and decentralization without the long-term innovation benefits. The article concludes that, just as open systems historically win, Ethereum is poised to become the foundational, neutral settlement layer for global finance.

marsbitHá 11m

Ethereum Is Retracing the Path of the Internet and Linux: No One Yields, and the Neutral Party Ultimately Prevails

marsbitHá 11m

Kalshi's Biggest Rival is Not Polymarket

Kalshi's CEO Tarek Mansour has identified the company's primary competitors not as the crypto-based prediction market Polymarket, but as established financial and gaming giants: CME Group, Robinhood, and DraftKings. This reflects a shift in the prediction market landscape, where the 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to bring massive new trading volume. Traditional platforms are increasingly integrating prediction markets as a feature within their existing ecosystems. Robinhood has seen rapid growth with its prediction markets, contributing significantly to its "other transaction revenue." Similarly, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) integrates contracts from Kalshi and CME Group, while DraftKings and FanDuel (via CME) have launched their own prediction products. This allows these firms to leverage their vast user bases and infrastructure at low marginal cost, turning prediction markets from standalone apps into embedded functionalities. In response, prediction market platforms are evolving along two paths. First, they are expanding into new event categories like sports (e.g., the World Cup) and financial data to reduce reliance on election cycles. Second, they are moving towards becoming infrastructure and liquidity providers for distribution platforms. Kalshi's lead over Polymarket in trading volume is partly attributed to this channel strategy, integrating with brokers like Robinhood, Coinbase, and Webull. However, this strategy faces a challenge as distributors like Robinhood begin building their own in-house prediction market capabilities (e.g., Rothera), potentially threatening the value of pure infrastructure providers. The situation parallels historical tech battles, such as Zoom competing with Microsoft Teams and Google Meet, where embedded features in larger platforms reshape market dynamics. The future of standalone prediction market leaders like Kalshi and Polymarket will depend on their ability to navigate this new competitive landscape dominated by integrated financial and gaming titans.

链捕手Há 18m

Kalshi's Biggest Rival is Not Polymarket

链捕手Há 18m

Are the AI Giants' 'Token Subsidy Wars' Almost Over?

The article "Are AI Giants' 'Token Subsidy Wars' Nearing an End?" examines the ongoing price competition in AI token pricing, arguing that current subscription costs are heavily subsidized, with services like OpenAI and Anthropic reportedly subsidizing tokens at up to 70 times the subscription fee. Unlike past tech "subsidy wars" (e.g., ride-hailing, food delivery), AI tokens lack strong lock-in effects; users can easily switch providers if prices rise, making sustained subsidies risky. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry: giants like Google can fund subsidies with massive advertising revenue, while rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic rely on investor capital. Google Ventures founder Bill Maris suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors, especially as model capabilities converge. The article posits two potential endgames: a "winner-takes-all" monopoly scenario (like internet platforms) or a "utility" model where tokens become a low-margin, standardized commodity like electricity. Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. This implies a prolonged, profitless competition where the primary goal for companies is to stay in the game, not to achieve dominance. For users, this may mean continued access to heavily subsidized AI services for the foreseeable future.

marsbitHá 1h

Are the AI Giants' 'Token Subsidy Wars' Almost Over?

marsbitHá 1h

Trends in US Stocks (June 22): Strait of Hormuz Agreement Changes Course, Thursday's PCE and Micron to Determine Chip Sector Direction

U.S. Stock Market Outlook (June 22): Strait of Hormuz Deal Falters, Thursday's PCE & Micron to Set Chip Sector Direction. Geopolitical tensions resurged over the weekend as Iran's IRGC announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and its negotiation team walked out after threats from Trump, pausing U.S.-Iran talks. This renewed risk premium is weighing on U.S. equity futures ahead of the open. Last week's market was driven by chip stocks, with the Philly Semiconductor Index hitting a record high. While the Fed's hawkish tone was overshadowed by initial deal optimism, the S&P 500 gained 0.9% for the week. SpaceX debuted strongly but ended with two down days. Key events this week: The status of U.S.-Iran negotiations remains the immediate variable for oil and energy stocks. Monday sees Marvell and Flex added to the S&P 500. Tuesday's MSCI reclassification could benefit South Korean semiconductors and memory stocks. **Thursday, June 25th, is the critical day**, featuring the May Core PCE report and Micron's earnings. Hotter PCE data could solidify expectations for two 2024 rate hikes, while softer data would rapidly reprice rate cut bets. Micron's report is a key test for the AI narrative; the market will scrutinize its 2027 HBM supply visibility, HBM4 progress, and its position in Nvidia's Vera Rubin supply chain. Nvidia's AGM and a potential OpenAI GPT-5.6 release will make Thursday a pivotal 24 hours for AI. Friday concludes with the Russell reconstitution, elevating small-cap volatility. In summary, last week's gains face a true test. The path hinges on two concurrent threads: geopolitical developments with Iran and the AI narrative defined by Micron's guidance and Nvidia's updates. The chip sector's record highs are vulnerable if Thursday brings hot PCE data and conservative guidance from Micron. Conversely, positive outcomes could reaffirm the AI bull case, making this week's volatility a potential entry window.

marsbitHá 1h

Trends in US Stocks (June 22): Strait of Hormuz Agreement Changes Course, Thursday's PCE and Micron to Determine Chip Sector Direction

marsbitHá 1h

Viewpoint: The Impossible Triangle is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

"The Cryptography System That Can't Keep a Secret" Blockchain is a slow, expensive, shared computer owned by no one, whose only advantage is permissionless access and trustless verification. While "scalability" was solved, the true barriers to mass institutional adoption are two inherent design features: legal ambiguity and radical financial transparency. The industry found its killer app—pure ledger-based assets like money (e.g., $300B+ stablecoins)—but serves a narrow band of users. Large capital (family offices, sovereign funds) stays away because it's legally uncertain and operationally exposes every position and transaction to the public and predatory MEV, which acts as a quantifiable tax. We built a powerful cryptographic system yet failed to encrypt user activity. Privacy is not the enemy of compliance. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables proving facts (solvency, KYC, risk limits) without revealing the underlying data. This resolves the transparency vs. privacy false dilemma. "Default privacy with provable compliance" is a pure upgrade, retaining auditability for regulators while eliminating the leak. It's the bridge for the next trillion dollars of capital, finally allowing the most powerful cryptography to do what it was always meant to: keep a secret.

marsbitHá 1h