Xianyu, the OpenClaw More Suited for Chinese Users

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

The article "Xianyu: The OpenClaw More Suited for Chinese Users" argues that while OpenClaw (a hypothetical AI agent) has generated significant buzz for enabling AI to perform digital tasks, the Chinese second-hand marketplace Xianyu serves as a more practical and "localized" alternative for many. The author contrasts OpenClaw's high computational costs (token consumption) and complex setup with Xianyu's extremely low-cost, human-powered services. On Xianyu, users can find people to perform a vast array of tasks—from booking hotels and buying tickets to AI subscriptions, hiring help, and even matchmaking—often at a fraction of the cost of using an AI. The platform is portrayed as a massive, flexible ecosystem where unconventional supply meets niche demand, creating a parallel economy with over 200 million monthly active users. The piece draws parallels between the two platforms: OpenClaw acts as a leverage tool using AI and tokens, while Xianyu leverages cheap and abundant human labor. Both systems facilitate a form of arbitrage—OpenClaw with digital tokens, and Xianyu through bilateral transactions between buyers and sellers. Ultimately, the article suggests that for China, with its specific socio-economic context and different attitude towards privacy, Xianyu's human-network-based model is a more effective and accessible "agent" platform than an AI-driven solution like OpenClaw.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser2010)

The "Lobster Craze" sparked by OpenClaw has slightly subsided on major social media platforms. A couple of days ago, Anthropic, the developer of Claude, directly issued a statement prohibiting "OpenClaw subscription-based free riding," leading some to exclaim, "Has OpenClaw already cooled down?"

In my opinion, against the backdrop where over 90% of the global population of 8 billion has yet to use AI applications, OpenClaw is already a phenomenal AI product. Its popularity lasting a full three months is enough to demonstrate its sensational impact. On the other hand, for the majority of people in China, perhaps compared to OpenClaw, which consumes massive amounts of Tokens, has complex configuration processes, excessively high update frequencies, and unclear security risks, Xianyu might be the "more localized OpenClaw."

Some readers might be confused seeing this: Xianyu? That second-hand trading platform? What does that have to do with OpenClaw, the current hottest topic in AI?

Let me explain in detail.

Before OpenClaw Gave AI Hands and Feet, Xianyu Had Already Become the Transaction Engine for the Physical World

"If previous Chatbots gave AI a brain; then the value of OpenClaw lies in giving AI hands and feet for the first time."

This statement emphasizes that OpenClaw enables AI Agents to possess various operational and execution capabilities, performing various tasks in the digital world on behalf of humans, and even to some extent, acting upon the physical world in reverse.

However, the more realistic problem facing everyone is that compared to Chatbots whose Token consumption per conversation remained in the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands, OpenClaw has skyrocketed the scale of API calls and Token usage for AI Agents to millions, tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions. Many have bluntly stated that after the emergence of OpenClaw, to ensure effectiveness, the Token cost of using high-quality models like Claude, GPT, and Gemini can reach hundreds of dollars a day.

Yet the same task, placed as an order on Xianyu, might cost less than one percent. Yes, you read that correctly. Entering the "summer of the 21st century," the cost of human labor on the Xianyu platform has been compressed to the extreme. The time of the "poor" has also gained its own unit of measurement and pricing system—an economic system operating on RMB and Xianyu Coins.

All Trades and Professions Produce Their Topmost Masters: Travel, AI, Sales, Recruitment, Matchmaking

Xianyu frequently sparks waves of discussion. People jokingly call the omnipotent Xianyu platform the "Chinese Dark Web"—on Xianyu, there's nothing you can't think of that it can't do.

Some sell moldy oranges on Xianyu, which are spotted by biology and medical students who say they want to extract the mold for scientific research, buying them back at high prices ranging from hundreds to thousands of yuan;

Some "low-price" sell rare famous dogs on Xianyu—Belgian Wood Dogs, described as "spayed female dogs";

Battle-damaged second-hand Apple phones are considered a relatively normal "small case" on Xianyu.

As for using Xianyu to book hotels, buy tickets, purchase low-cost AI subscription memberships, find helpers, recruit people, and even for matchmaking, these are also part of the platform's "daily business."

With the unconventional creativity of Xianyu sellers, the "sources of goods" are also quite unconventional:

There are those who help others collect拖欠工资 (withheld wages), deploying an 80-year-old grandmother in a wheelchair to the front lines—

Finding someone to help book hotel breakfast, costing as low as 5 yuan, only to later find out it was obtained by threatening to jump off a building—

Wanting to go to a music festival but didn't get a ticket, you think the scalper has connections to get you in, but instead he leads you through a dog hole—

The once famous "Xianyu Air Ticket Refund Service" also sparked much discussion on social media platforms, with the behind-the-scenes trick being "applying for a user death certificate"—

Want to buy low-price scenic spot tickets? The Xianyu seller's external trick is a phone call telling the scenic spot staff "this person is almost gone"—

On this second-hand trading platform with over 200 million monthly active users, various marginal market demands hidden in the capillaries of the domestic internet market and a diverse array of flexible supplies coexist. Thus, a consumer market parallel to mainstream e-commerce platforms and even offline shopping channels has, in less than 13 years, gradually膨胀 (expanded) into today's多元 (diverse) transaction universe, recording 217 million MAU in March, even surpassing Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book).

As early as the beginning of 2024, its daily GMV (Gross Merchandise Volume) had already exceeded 1 billion yuan. Now, thanks to the "AI Camera Function" launched in early March, new products on Xianyu surged by over 50 million items, with more than 12 million users participating in the experience. Furthermore, industry predictions indicate that the scale of the domestic second-hand交易 (transaction) market is expected to exceed 3.1 trillion yuan by 2026, with Xianyu playing a significant role.

The Premium Economics and Free Power Theory Behind Xianyu: Leverage, Arbitrage, Collaboration, and Productivity

The unique survival rules, distinct from other e-commerce platforms, have allowed Xianyu to rise meteorically and find its comfort zone while the domestic internet user market is陷入 (mired in)存量 (stock) competition.

Behind this现状 (status quo), there is a remarkable similarity to the rapidly developing AI in recent years and OpenClaw, which topped the GitHub star chart this year. It contains its own set of premium economics and free power theory.

Last month, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed this phenomenon:

Although some wording is quite extreme, the "premium theory" and "power theory" therein indeed reveal the unique value and market pricing system of Xianyu as a second-hand trading platform. Behind these words, we can glimpse more reasons why Xianyu can be called the "Chinese Localized OpenClaw":

1. AI Limbs vs. Human and Material Leverage

If OpenClaw gave AI independent operational execution capabilities for the first time, then the value of Xianyu lies in enabling the flow, circulation, and value production of human and material resources with an extremely low threshold.

As the joke about学历贬值 (devaluation of academic qualifications) goes: "For 3000 yuan, you can't even buy a 5090 graphics card; but you can hire a college student to work for you."

Whether it's second-hand goods or cheap labor, the Xianyu platform has subjected them to full market pricing and value quantification. In a双边市场 (two-sided market) where supply far exceeds demand, the human and material resources on Xianyu are even more abundant than the AI models and Token resources required by OpenClaw.

2. Token Arbitrage vs. Bilateral Arbitrage

For countless human users, OpenClaw, which responds 24/7 and allows随意添加 (arbitrary addition of) Skill configuration files to expand capability boundaries, is undoubtedly a "Token arbitrage tool"—input the cheapest possible Token raw materials into the machine, and then produce specific content production materials according to one's指令 (instructions). Although this has led to large-scale, exponential Token usage consumption problems, it still allows countless people to experience the thrill of "mastering AI production materials" and becoming "AI capitalists" for the first time.

The commodity resources and market demand on the Xianyu platform, however, represent a form of bilateral arbitrage based on buyers and sellers—leveraging low entry costs, low handling fees (Odaily Planet Daily Note: In June 2024, the Xianyu platform announced that starting September 1 of that year, it would charge all sellers a 0.6% basic software service fee, with a maximum of 60 yuan per transaction, including individual merchants) and the platform's aggregated large-scale idle human resources to do platform business.

Moreover, similar to OpenClaw catering to both Token providers and consumer users, Xianyu also satisfies the bilateral needs of product/service providers and market demanders, and corresponds with Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

3. Lobster Collaboration vs. Human Collaboration

In terms of team collaboration, compared to OpenClaw's "Lobster Corps" or "AI Agent teams," Xianyu also has its merits, which is筛选 (screening for) professional "mercenaries" that meet different requirements, possess different abilities, and play various roles.

Like the intelligent driving in the new energy vehicle sector, the intent engine highly praised in the cryptocurrency market, and the self-driving, self-evolving, self-developing large language models in the AI field, Xianyu can also be seen as a "screening platform" for finding collaborative members.

In essence, the puzzles formed by the technologies and personnel involved above are all the same thing. The ultimate goal of the users is所思即所求 (what you think is what you want),所言即所用 (what you say is what you use),所见即所得 (what you see is what you get).

4. Information Productivity vs. Information Gap Productivity

Strictly speaking, AI does not originally create information. Large language models and various AI Agents merely follow reasoning rules, combine, match, and call upon various information raw materials (including text, images, videos, and other multimodal content), and finally output information products in different forms.

In contrast, humans can not only absorb information and learn from it but also produce various types of information, and can create information gaps through various types of information to create value accordingly. The various service providers on Xianyu have their own subjective judgment abilities, self-screening abilities, and self-driving abilities.

For overseas countries where labor costs remain high and population aging is accelerating, AI Agent applications represented by OpenClaw and embodied intelligent robots may open a new "window of productivity development" for them;而对于 (for) the domestic internet population enjoying past demographic dividends, resource dividends, and even manufacturing dividends, perhaps an internet labor and commodity service provision platform like Xianyu is a better solution. Just as Robin Li, founder of Baidu, once revealed the赤裸裸的真相 (naked truth)—in exchanging privacy for convenience, Chinese people have always been utterly uninhibited. In front of Xianyu, which efficiently convinces users to主动交出 (actively hand over) personal information for convenience, OpenClaw with its potential security risks can only be considered a small巫 (witch)见大巫 (seeing a great witch - meaning pale in comparison).

Facing the declining热度 (heat) of AI Agents and OpenClaw, looking from another perspective, the biggest reason might be—

Xianyu, the OpenClaw more suited for Chinese users.

References:

Has OpenClaw Cooled Down?

Haven't Been on Xianyu for 3 Days, How Did It Become the Chinese Dark Web?!

The Chinese Version of the Dark Web Really Knows What Young People Want

Xianyu Doesn't Want to Compare with Xiaohongshu Either, But It Really Has No Choice

600 Million People Are Looking for Services on It, The Worse the Economy, The Hotter the "Chinese Dark Web"?

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding Xianyu and OpenClaw?

AThe article argues that for most Chinese users, the second-hand trading platform Xianyu is a more practical and 'localized' alternative to OpenClaw. It highlights that Xianyu provides a vast, low-cost human labor and service marketplace, which is often cheaper and more accessible than using an AI agent that consumes expensive computational resources (Tokens).

QAccording to the article, why is Xianyu sometimes jokingly called the 'Chinese dark web'?

AXianyu is called the 'Chinese dark web' because it hosts an incredibly diverse and unconventional range of services and goods for sale. Users can find everything from rare moldy oranges for scientific study to unconventional services like help retrieving unpaid wages or obtaining event tickets through unusual means, creating a parallel, often bizarre, online marketplace.

QHow does the cost of completing a task on Xianyu compare to using OpenClaw, as stated in the article?

AThe article states that completing the same task on Xianyu can cost less than one percent of the cost of using OpenClaw. This is because the human labor and services available on Xianyu are priced extremely low within its RMB and Xianyu Coin-based economic system, whereas OpenClaw requires massive and expensive Token consumption.

QWhat are the four key reasons the article gives for comparing Xianyu to OpenClaw?

AThe four key reasons are: 1. Leverage of Human and Material Resources: Xianyu allows for the low-threshold flow and utilization of cheap labor and goods. 2. Bilateral Arbitrage: Like OpenClaw's token arbitrage, Xianyu facilitates arbitrage between service providers and buyers. 3. Human Collaboration: Xianyu acts as a screening platform to find specialized 'mercenaries' for various roles, similar to OpenClaw's AI agent teams. 4. Information Gap Productivity: Humans on Xianyu can use information asymmetry to create value, whereas AI primarily recombines existing information.

QWhat does the article suggest is a major reason for the declining hype around AI Agents like OpenClaw in China?

AThe article suggests that a major reason for the declining hype around AI Agents like OpenClaw is the existence of Xianyu, which is presented as a more suitable and effective solution for Chinese users. It offers a massive, readily available, and extremely cheap human-based service ecosystem that already fulfills many tasks one might use an AI for, making the complex and costly AI alternative less appealing.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit5m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit5m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit15m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit15m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片