World Liberty expands into lending as WLFI faces selling pressure – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a project linked to the Trump family, has expanded into crypto lending with the launch of its new platform, World Liberty Markets. Despite this strategic move and the growth of the crypto-collateralized lending sector, WLFI’s market performance remains under pressure. The token is consolidating around $0.16–$0.17, facing significant selling pressure and bearish momentum. Key indicators, including a positive netflow of $2.8 million and declining momentum readings, suggest continued downward risk. If selling persists, WLFI could fall to $0.15, though a successful product adoption could push it toward $0.20.

Crypto-collateralised lending expanded sharply in 2025, reaching $73 billion in Q3, according to Galaxy Research.

That sector-wide growth has drawn new entrants, including World Liberty Financial, which recently moved into on-chain lending.

World Liberty Financial [WLFI], a project linked to the Trump family, expanded its product suite by launching a crypto lending marketplace.

World Liberty Financial launches lending markets

World Liberty Financial launched World Liberty Markets on the 12th of January, a lending and borrowing platform powered by Dolomite. The web-based application allowed users to supply and borrow digital assets within a unified marketplace.

The product centered on USDI, World Liberty Financial’s dollar-backed stablecoin, alongside its native token, World Liberty Financial [WLFI].

Through the platform, users could earn yield on supplied USDI balances.

At the same time, borrowers could post collateral using assets such as Tether, USD Coin, Ethereum, and tokenized Bitcoin, including Coinbase-wrapped BTC (cBTC).

That launch marked the project’s second major product release following USDI’s debut in 2025.

According to CoinMarketCap data, USDI’s circulating market capitalization stood near $3.48 billion at press time.

Is this a game-changer for WLFI?

Despite World Liberty Financial’s launch of lending markets, the move has yet to positively impact WLFI’s market performance.

In fact, WLFI has continued to trade within a narrow margin and is currently consolidating around the $0.16- $0.17 range. At press time, WLFI traded near $0.168, reflecting modest intraday gains, according to CoinMarketCap.

These market conditions indicate continued struggle, with pressure increasingly on both demand and supply. In fact, WLFI has continued to face massive sell pressure, with scarcity declining significantly.

According to CoinGlass, WLFI Netflow has remained positive for two consecutive days, rising to a total of $2.8 million over this period. Often, a positive Netflow suggests higher inflows, a clear sign of aggressive spot selling.

Historically, higher inflows have preceded greater downward pressure on an asset, a prelude to lower prices. In fact, downward momentum has remained elevated as evidenced by the Directional Movement Index (DMI).

This momentum indicator has dropped to 23, while its negative index jumped to a high of 30, reflecting strong bearish pressure.

At the same time, its Relative Vigor Index (RVGI) fell to 0.12, further validating the trend’s strength. When these directional momentum indicators drop to such levels, it reflects strong downward pressure and weakened structure.

Often, such market conditions have led to lower prices. If World Liberty Financial sellers continue to offload, WLFI could breach $0.16 support and drop to $0.15.

However, if the recent launch of the lending market positively impacts price action, the altcoin could break out and target $0.2.

Final Thoughts

World Liberty Financial’s move into crypto lending expanded its utility narrative, but markets have not priced that shift in yet.
Exchange flows and momentum indicators suggested traders remained cautious despite the product launch. Whether adoption can outweigh near-term selling pressure may shape WLFI’s next decisive move.

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit22m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit22m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit30m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit30m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News34m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News34m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit42m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit42m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit50m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit50m ago

Trading

Spot