Why is XDC’s price up today — And, can this rally actually last?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-17Last updated on 2025-12-17

Abstract

XDC Network's price increased by 6.14% in 24 hours, making it a short-term performer despite a broader altcoin slump. The rally was partly driven by its recent listing on Biconomy for XDC/USDC spot trading. However, the 1-day chart shows a bearish structure with capital outflow and negative momentum, as indicated by CMF and MACD. A brief bullish surge on the hourly chart encountered resistance at $0.051, followed by a 4.2% retracement. While short-term buying pressure exists, the overall trend remains bearish. A break below $0.0487 could signal further declines toward $0.046 or $0.044. Traders are advised to consider short positions aligned with the dominant downtrend rather than betting against it.

XDC Network [XDC] posted a 6.14% surge in the past 24 hours. It is one of the standout performers in the crypto market in the short term.

Most altcoins were in a slump, following Bitcoin’s [BTC] drop to $85.7k in the early hours of Tuesday.

The recent XDC rally was partly driven by the positivity in the market following an exchange listing. On the 10th of December, Biconomy announced the listing of the XDC/USDC spot trading pair.

Assessing the XDC long-term trend

On the 1-day chart, XDC had a bearish structure and a prevailing downtrend.

The CMF showed that significant capital was flowing out of the market, representing selling strength. The MACD showed momentum was neutral over the past week.

Both the MACD and signal lines were below zero, once again affirming the overall bearish momentum. To add to this, on the 14th of December, XDC closed a daily trading session below the previous lower high at $0.0475.

This represented a continuation of the bearish trend on the chosen timeframe.

The 1-hour timeframe showed a strong bout of bullish momentum on Monday, the 15th of December.

This bullish impulse ran into the $0.051 supply zone, which marked a local swing high on the hourly chart.

Since this retest, XDC has retraced by 4.2% in under 24 hours.

However, its technical indicators were more positive- the CMF showed significant buying pressure, though the MACD showed a bearish crossover from the MACD and signal lines.

The less likely scenario for XDC traders

The 1-day timeframe is bearish, but the CMF’s surge in the hourly chart hinted at a possible short-term reversal. If XDC can defend the $0.0487 local support, there is a chance of a rally beyond $0.051. Traders shouldn’t bet on this scenario since the daily timeframe is bearish.

Traders’ call to action – go short when...

Given the market-wide fear and Bitcoin weakness, it is more likely that XDC will face losses soon. A drop below $0.0487 would flip the hourly structure bearishly, giving lower timeframe traders a chance to go short.

Their targets would be the swing low at $0.046 and the Fibonacci extension level at $0.044.

Final Thoughts

  • XDC saw a 6% rally on the back of a Biconomy rally and a retest of a local supply zone at $0.051 on Monday.
  • Lower timeframe traders can wait for a bearish shift, despite the buying pressure, as it would align with the 1-day timeframe’s trend and give more profitable trade opportunities.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Related Reads

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Bankless founder David Hoffman explains his decision to sell all his ETH. He clarifies this is not due to bearishness on Ethereum itself, which he remains extremely optimistic about, but rather because he believes the core "ETH is Money" narrative he championed has already been priced in. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve status as a global reserve currency, Ethereum needed to execute perfectly across all layers—governance, technology, L2 coordination, and market dominance—faster than competitors. While Ethereum has performed admirably and earned its current valuation, the window for a fundamental revaluation of ETH upward has likely closed. Key factors include: the clear market correlation between L1 chain revenue/fees and native asset price (evident with SOL and NEAR); the failure of the "strong version" of crypto (ideological, self-sustaining) to maintain lasting mainstream appeal beyond a brief period; and the reality that Ethereum's architecture acts as a "giver," providing security and tokenization at cost, which benefits other monies (like stablecoins) as much as or more than ETH itself. He concludes that Ethereum's success will increasingly accrue to its applications and L2s (following a "fat app" theory), with ETH structurally positioned to capture only minimal value. Therefore, he sold to reallocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

marsbit16m ago

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

marsbit16m ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手20m ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手20m ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit26m ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit26m ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit26m ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit26m ago

The AI Industrial Revolution: Where Are We Now?

This article explores the current stage of the AI industrial revolution, arguing we are still merely attaching new tools to old workflows rather than fundamentally redesigning production. The author compares this to the early Industrial Revolution, where factories simply replaced waterwheels with steam engines without changing their core structure. Similarly, today we embed AI chat windows into existing software but leave organizational processes unchanged. While massive investment floods into AI infrastructure (data centers, chips), akin to railway manias of the past, the real transformation lies in "dismantling the old workshop"—reorganizing companies around AI. Examples include Notion's use of hundreds of AI Agents and Y Combinator's experiments with self-improving AI systems that operate autonomously. The author notes a critical gap: while China has vast AI user growth, few companies have rebuilt core workflows. AI is beginning to impact entry-level jobs, and early adopters are gaining a compounding advantage. The conclusion is that the pivotal moment will not be the invention of better models, but when organizations decide to tear down old structures and rebuild around AI, shifting the bottleneck from human coordination to computing power. The future workplace and job titles are yet to be defined, but the imperative is to move away from legacy processes and position oneself where the new "railway" is being built.

marsbit59m ago

The AI Industrial Revolution: Where Are We Now?

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow