Why Base’s $15.2B trading boom raises questions about L2 tokens

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

Base is shifting its focus from creator rewards and social features to prioritize trading, as evidenced by the shutdown of its Creator Rewards program and Farcaster-powered social feed. The program, which distributed around $450,000 to 17,000 creators over seven months, is being discontinued to allow the platform to concentrate on tradable assets. This strategic pivot raises questions about the potential role of a native Base token, especially since discussions about its launch have quieted recently. The network's strong performance suggests a token may not be necessary. Over the past 30 days, Base-linked DEXs processed $15.2 billion in trading volume, with Aerodrome Finance (AERO) leading much of the activity. The network has also generated $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue, demonstrating its ability to monetize usage directly without relying on a token for growth. Coinbase's recent Super Bowl ad further indicates a focus on brand building and streamlined priorities. With trading volume and fees effectively serving the function a token typically would, a native Base token appears optional rather than essential.

The Base app is dropping creator rewards and moving its focus on trading, which says a lot about where Coinbase sees traction today.

But that raises an important question. What role, if any, will a native Base token play, especially since talk of launching one has gone noticeably quiet in recent months?

Putting trading first

Coinbase is shutting down the app’s Creator Rewards program and its Farcaster-powered social feed, with its focus now on tradable assets. The Creator Rewards initiative, launched in July, was designed to encourage posts and engagement by paying users for activity.

In practice, the payouts were modest. Base says around $450,000 was shared among roughly 17,000 creators over seven months, averaging about $26 per person.

Source: X

According to creator Jesse Pollak, the decision came down to focus. As the app evolved, the team realized it worked best when it did fewer things well. He stated,

“…as we’ve rolled the app out, we’ve realized we need to do less, better. and by focusing on tradable assets, that’s exactly what we can do.”

The Creator Rewards program will officially end this week, with final payouts scheduled for the 18th of February. Pollak also noted that Base App was never an ideal home for Farcaster’s social feed, and expects most users to return to Farcaster’s native app.

Importantly, the changes do not affect Base’s Creator Coins feature, which remains active.

AMBCrypto previously reported that Coinbase was considering launching a native token called BASE, and that it was likely to happen this year. However, there’s not been much talk on that front since.

Do they really need a native token, though?

For now, it looks like they don’t.

Source: DeFiLlama

Over the past 30 days, Base-linked DEXs have processed $15.2 billion in trading volume, with Aerodrome Finance [AERO] alone accounting for the bulk of that activity. That puts them ahead of many multi-chain competitors.

Source: Token Terminal

More importantly, the network is generating real money. Data per Token Terminal showed that Base has earned $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue to date, with steady weekly inflows.

Instead of relying on a token to bootstrap growth, Base is already monetizing usage directly.

Source: Twitter

In more recent news, this year’s Super Bowl featured just one major crypto ad, and it was from Coinbase. The streamlining of priorities makes sense as Coinbase seemingly looks to build a bigger brand.


Final Thoughts

  • Base is prioritizing trading and revenue, with volume and fees doing the work a token usually would.
  • With growth already monetized, a native Base token looks optional rather than necessary.
Next: Cardano: Why CME’s ADA futures sparked 3% drop instead of a rally
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Related Questions

QWhy is Base shutting down its Creator Rewards program and social feed?

ABase is shutting down these features to focus on doing fewer things well, specifically by concentrating on tradable assets, as the team realized the app works best with a more streamlined approach.

QHow much trading volume have Base-linked DEXs processed in the past 30 days?

ABase-linked DEXs have processed $15.2 billion in trading volume over the past 30 days, with Aerodrome Finance (AERO) accounting for the bulk of that activity.

QWhat is the current status of a potential native Base token launch?

ATalk of launching a native Base token has gone noticeably quiet in recent months, and with the network already generating significant revenue through fees, a token now seems optional rather than necessary.

QHow much revenue has Base generated from fees to date?

ABase has earned $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue to date, according to data from Token Terminal.

QWhat does Base's shift in focus and recent performance suggest about the need for a Layer 2 native token?

ABase's strong trading volume and revenue generation demonstrate that it can monetize usage directly without relying on a native token for growth, making a token launch appear optional rather than essential.

Related Reads

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit27m ago

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit27m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit31m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit31m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报37m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报37m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit42m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit42m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit43m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit43m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片