Why are Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP’s prices down? ETF flows, Fed rates, and more…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-09Last updated on 2026-01-09

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market lost $120 billion this week, reversing January's recovery. Bitcoin's price dropped from $94,500 to $90,000, driven by $729 million in outflows from U.S. spot ETFs over two days. Market sentiment was dampened by rising expectations of a Fed rate pause, now at 86.7% probability. Key economic data in January may further influence risk asset sentiment. Altcoins declined more sharply than Bitcoin. XRP fell 14%, erasing nearly half its January gains, with key support at $2. If broken, it could drop to $1.80. Ethereum dropped 6% to $3,000, hovering near a symmetric triangle pattern. A bullish breakout could target $3,600, while a drop below $2,900 may lead to further declines. Despite the pullback, the altcoin season index improved from 25 to a neutral 57, indicating underlying strength. Institutional demand pause and Fed policy concerns drove the mid-week correction, though key support levels may help stabilize prices.

The cryptocurrency market has shed $120 billion this week after January’s recovery curve stalled. In particular, Bitcoin’s rebound, which was lifted by over $1 billion in ETF inflows, reversed by mid-week.

According to SoSo Value’s data, U.S Spot ETFs saw $729 million in total outflows on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Over the same period, Bitcoin’s price shed over $4,500 and dropped from $94,500 to $90,000 on the price charts.

Fed rate pause ahead?

The market sentiment was further soured by the expectation of a Fed rate pause at the meeting scheduled for 29 January. Over the past two days, the odds of a rate pause rose by 4% to 86.7%.

The Jobs report and inflation data scheduled for 9 and 14 January could further affect the rate cut outlook and drive the market sentiment for risk assets.

However, the current rate pause outlook at 3.50%-3.75% further dragged crypto lower.

However, it must be noted that although BTC fell by 5%, major altcoins dumped even harder during the mid-week retreat.

XRP and ETH cool off

XRP, for example, depreciated by 14% from $2.4 to $2, reversing nearly half of its significant January gains.

Near-term bulls could track the $2-support zone as a possible reversal point. The area also coincided with the 50-day Moving Average (MA) that could reinforce short-term bullish momentum if defended.

However, a break below it could send XRP’s price to the recent lows near $1.80. Here, it’s worth pointing out that the altcoin also saw massive whale interest during the early 2026 recovery – A trend that could trigger a swift reversal if market sentiment improves.

Like BTC, Ethereum’s [ETH] price also dropped by about 6% from $3,300 to $3,000. December’s price action chalked a symmetric triangle pattern that could go either way. However, in the event of a bullish breakout, the immediate target would be $3,600.

On the contrary, a dip below $2.9k would indicate a bearish breakout and likely lead to further price compression.

Even so, the altcoin season index reading jumped from 25 to a neutral reading of 57 at press time – A sign that alluded to a considerable rebound for the sector in January, despite the recent cool-off.


Final Thoughts

  • A pause on institutional demand for BTC and crypto triggered a mid-week cool-off among top altcoins.
  • XRP and ETH’s position above key short-term moving averages seemed to reinforce bullish momentum at press time.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the total amount of outflows from U.S. Spot ETFs on Tuesday and Wednesday, according to SoSo Value's data?

AU.S. Spot ETFs saw $729 million in total outflows on Tuesday and Wednesday.

QHow much did the odds of a Fed rate pause increase over the past two days, and what was the new probability?

AThe odds of a Fed rate pause rose by 4% to 86.7% over the past two days.

QFrom what price did XRP depreciate by 14% to what new price level?

AXRP depreciated by 14% from $2.4 to $2.

QWhat is the immediate price target for Ethereum (ETH) in the event of a bullish breakout from its symmetric triangle pattern?

AIn the event of a bullish breakout, the immediate target for Ethereum would be $3,600.

QWhat key indicator jumped from 25 to a neutral reading of 57, signaling a potential rebound for the altcoin sector?

AThe altcoin season index jumped from 25 to a neutral reading of 57, alluding to a considerable rebound for the sector.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit11m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit11m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit27m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片