Whale sell-offs hit PUMP despite buybacks: Will it derail the 16% recovery?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-01Last updated on 2026-01-01

Abstract

Despite ongoing buyback efforts by the protocol, significant whale sell-offs are threatening PUMP's recovery. A major holder sold 750 million tokens at a 51% loss, part of a broader capitulation trend. Although the project uses 100% of its revenue for buybacks, including a record $2.74 million purchase, the price remains depressed. Market sentiment is at a record low, with Open Interest in futures markets plummeting 85%. While a recent 16% Santa rally and a MACD golden cross offer some hope, a sustained recovery is contingent on reclaiming the 50-day Moving Average and a revival in speculative demand.

Some notable key players are exiting their Pump [PUMP] positions at a loss, a whale capitulation that could derail the ongoing recovery attempt.

The native token of the Solana-based memecoin launchpad, Pumpfun, crashed by 78% in 2025. It appeared some big players were ready to cut their losses and move on.

On the 1st of January, a 6-month whale holder reportedly moved 750 million PUMP tokens (worth $1.47 million) in Hyperliquid, likely for a sell-off.

This would result in a 51% loss, as the investor had spent $3 million on the PUMP position.

In fact, several whale wallets ramped up sell-off from mid-November.

Pump buyback fails to lift price

Pump.fun is one of the protocols that dedicate revenue for token value accrual via buybacks.

Although the pace of weekly buybacks had declined to less than $10 million by late 2025, this accounted for 100% of the revenue generated during that period.

In fact, the biggest buyback yet (1.46 billion PUMP worth $2.74 million) was made recently. Despite a few whales also bidding for the token at current lows, the recovery has been somewhat lukewarm.

Will PUMP recovery extend?

However, Front Runners projected that the token may have bottomed out.

“Price is still so depressed that this level of buybacks should start showing up in the chart relatively soon (chart looks quite bottomed out).”

Even so, market sentiment was at record lows, going by the speculative interest in the Futures market.

The Open Interest (OI), or the overall number of opened contracts in the derivatives market, has declined from $1 billion to $142 million — An 85% decline.

This implied that overall demand for PUMP across the Futures markets crashed in Q3 and dropped further in Q4 2025. Unless these conditions improve, a recovery may be delayed.

On the price charts, however, the December recovery triggered a MACD golden cross that could further raise recovery hopes.

The altcoin has recovered 16% during the Santa rally, but a recovery extension could be confirmed only if the 50-day Moving Average (MA) is reclaimed.


Final Thoughts

  • Whales were selling into the recent PUMP price recovery but a loss, signalling capitulation.
  • Speculative interest in the token crashed by 85% and was yet to fully recover.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason the article suggests the PUMP token recovery might be derailed?

AThe main reason is that some notable key players (whales) are exiting their PUMP positions at a loss, a capitulation that could derail the ongoing recovery attempt.

QHow much did the 6-month whale holder lose when they sold 750 million PUMP tokens on January 1st?

AThe whale holder incurred a 51% loss, as they had spent $3 million on the position and sold the tokens for $1.47 million.

QDespite the protocol's buyback efforts, why has the PUMP price recovery been described as 'lukewarm'?

AThe recovery has been lukewarm because, despite the protocol's significant buybacks and some whales bidding at current lows, whale sell-offs and a massive 85% decline in speculative interest (Open Interest) have counteracted the positive impact.

QWhat technical indicator on the price charts has given some hope for a further PUMP recovery?

AThe December recovery triggered a MACD golden cross, which could further raise recovery hopes.

QAccording to the article, what key level must the price reclaim to confirm an extension of the recovery?

AA recovery extension could be confirmed only if the 50-day Moving Average (MA) is reclaimed.

Related Reads

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit3m ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit3m ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PUMP (PUMP) are presented below.

活动图片