US Stock Storage Fever Spreads to Crypto for the Third Time, VVV Leads 'AI Data Infrastructure' Sector Gains

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-11Last updated on 2026-05-11

Abstract

U.S. stock storage rally spreads to crypto for the third time, with VVV leading the 'AI data infrastructure' sector. On May 11, Venice Token (VVV) surged 17.63% with $65.05M volume, followed by Chainbase, SQD, and Vana, rising 5-8%. This mirrors gains in U.S. storage stocks like SanDisk and Micron. The crypto AI narrative is shifting. The initial wave (May 6-7) saw pure storage tokens like FIL, AR, and STORJ rise, driven by spillover from the U.S. storage chip boom. The second wave saw broader DePIN sector gains. The current third wave has moved beyond pure storage to broader "AI infrastructure." VVV, a decentralized AI inference platform, leads due to its own catalysts like a token burn mechanism and partnership news, alongside the broader market trend. Notably, traditional storage tokens showed minimal gains (<4%) on May 11, indicating the rally is becoming more selective, focusing on projects with specific narratives like AI data or compute. The pattern suggests the sector rally may be in a later stage, with sustainability depending on whether the U.S. storage chip boom continues.

Author: Claude, Shenchao TechFlow

Shenchao Insight: The capital spillover effect of the US stock market's storage chip "super cycle" is recurring in the crypto market with a frequency of three times a week. On May 11, the 'AI Data Infrastructure' sector token Venice Token (VVV) surged 17.63% in a single day, leading the gains with a trading volume of $65.05 million; Chainbase, SQD, and Vana followed with gains between 5% and 8%. Meanwhile, the fuel hasn't died down on the US stock end. On May 8, SanDisk skyrocketed 16.60%, Micron Technology rose 15.49%, pushing its market cap past $842.2 billion, and accumulated a nearly 38% gain for the week. From FIL breaking out of its range on May 6, to IO soaring 69% in a single day on May 7, and VVV taking the baton this Monday, the market trend has extended from single storage leaders to the entire "AI Data + Inference Compute" infrastructure sector.

The crypto AI sector is up again today, but the narrative is quietly shifting.

If the story a week ago was "the three major storage leaders FIL, AR, and STORJ rising in tandem with US stocks SanDisk and Micron," then entering this week, the main market trend has spread from pure storage to a broader "AI infrastructure": AI inference compute (VVV), on-chain data networks (Chainbase), data indexing (SQD), user data DAOs (Vana) are taking turns leading the charge. However, the driving source behind all this remains unchanged: the still-burning storage chip frenzy in US stocks.

First Wave of Transmission: May 6, FIL/AR/STORJ Triple Rise

The first instance of follow-on gains in the crypto market occurred on May 6.

According to a BanklessTimes report on May 6, Filecoin (FIL) opened at $0.975 that day, reaching an intraday high of $1.161 and closing at $1.122, marking a single-day gain of 15.08%, breaking out of a sideways consolidation range that had lasted over three months since early February. FIL's spot trading volume for the day reached $372 million, a sharp 260.22% increase from the previous day; futures trading volume hit $816 million, up 213.63% sequentially. In the same sector, Storj gained 40% and Arweave rose 20% for the day.

Chinese crypto information channel Followin that day forwarded analyst Ao Ying's viewpoint, directly attributing this round of gains to capital spillover from US stock storage trading, stating "funds from equity market storage trading are repricing FIL." The logic chain is that AI infrastructure's consumption of storage capacity has already booked capacity through 2026; this supply-demand logic first gets priced in the US stock market, then transmits to crypto tokens pegged as "on-chain storage."

Second Wave Continuation: May 7, IO Soars 69% in a Day, DePIN Sector Follows Suit and Spreads

The market movement didn't stop after a single day. According to TradingView data cited by CoinMarketCap CMC AI, FIL rose another 15.5% on May 7, breaking through the key resistance level of $1.08 that it had failed to breach since February.

The sector's diffusion was even more dramatic, with IO surging 69% and STORJ rising another 30% on the same day. The second wave of gains indicates this is no longer a localized rally of "leaders rising alone while the long tail remains calm," but rather the DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) sector being systematically repriced by the market.

However, CoinMarketCap CMC AI also cited a bearish analysis on the same day, labeling FIL a "dead asset," citing the token's cumulative decline of 99% from its all-time high. This contradiction precisely reflects the current rift in the crypto storage sector: short-term beta-driven gains from capital spillover coexist with medium-to-long-term skepticism about business models.

Third Wave Diffusion: May 11, VVV Leads 'AI Data + Inference Compute' Gains

This Monday's rally saw the main theme shift from "pure storage" to broader "AI infrastructure."

Data shows VVV's current price is $17.83, with a market cap of $821 million and a single-day trading volume of $65.05 million, 5.7 times that of the second-ranked project in the sector, Chainbase. Ranks two through four in the sector were Chainbase (C, +8.25%), SQD (+5.65%), and Vana (VANA, +5.50%), with market caps ranging between $14 million and $54 million.

However, VVV is not strictly a storage token. According to a January 2025 report by The Block and Venice's official documentation, VVV is the native token of Venice, a decentralized AI inference platform founded by Erik Voorhees, positioned to "provide private, uncensorable inference services for AI Agents." Staking VVV allows users to proportionally share in the compute power revenue from the Venice API, without needing to pay per request.

VVV's leading gains have their own fundamental catalysts. According to a Phemex analysis on April 7, Venice permanently reduced its annual token inflation by 25% on February 10, 2026 (from 80 million to 60 million). On March 2, it surged 20% in a single day after OpenClaw announced selecting Venice as its primary inference model supplier. According to Messari data, Venice officially launched a "programmatic VVV buyback and burn" mechanism on April 15, where every Venice Pro subscription triggers a $1 on-chain token buyback and burn. CMC AI data shows that as of March, approximately 33 million VVV (42% of the initial supply) had been burned.

At this point, the crypto AI sector's story can be broken into two layers: the external factor is the spillover from the US stock storage frenzy, while the internal factor is that tokens like VVV, which have real deflation mechanisms and concrete partnership developments, are catalyzing themselves. The tokens that have delivered outsized gains in this rally almost all possess both layers of logic.

Four Genuine Storage Tokens Gained Less Than 4% Today

It's worth noting that the genuine storage projects are not among the top gainers on today's Surf list. Four traditional decentralized storage projects—AIOZ Network (+3.22%), Chia (+3.15%), Fluence (+2.79%), and Impossible Cloud Network (+1.33%)—all gained less than 4%. Last week's leaders, FIL, AR, and STORJ, don't even appear on this list.

This structural difference signals that the pure "storage beta transmission" rally might have entered its second stage. The first stage (May 6-7) was the catch-up rally of storage leaders. The second stage (this week) sees tokens with their own narrative catalysts taking the baton: VVV has its buy-and-burn mechanism, Chainbase carries the "AI data" label, while SQD and Vana belong to the "data network" concept. Capital is picking "tokens with a story" within the sector, rather than indiscriminately deploying funds.

Historically, this three-phase pattern of "leader catch-up → concept diffusion → capital cherry-picking" often signifies that a sector rally has entered its latter half. Future sustainability will depend on whether the US stock storage chip frenzy can maintain momentum. Based on the current supply-demand landscape of DRAM contract prices rising 58% to 63% and HBM capacity sold out through 2026, the story, at least from a fundamental perspective, is not over yet.

Related Questions

QWhat are the three major phases of the 'storage hype' spillover from the U.S. stock market into the crypto market as described in the article?

AThe three phases are: 1) Initial spillover on May 6th with leading storage tokens like FIL, AR, and STORJ rising. 2) Continuation and diffusion on May 7th, extending to the broader DePIN/AI infrastructure sector, highlighted by IO's surge. 3) Further diffusion on May 11th, where the rally spread from pure storage to 'AI data + inference compute' infrastructure, led by VVV and followed by projects like Chainbase, SQD, and Vana.

QWhy did VVV (Venice Token) experience a significant price increase on May 11th, according to the article?

AVVV's surge was driven by a combination of external and internal factors. Externally, it benefited from the ongoing spillover effect from the U.S. stock market's storage chip rally. Internally, it had specific fundamental catalysts: a permanent 25% reduction in annual token inflation in February 2026, a partnership announcement with OpenClaw in March that boosted its price, and the launch of a 'programmatic VVV buyback and burn' mechanism on April 15th, where every Venice Pro subscription triggers a $1 token buyback and burn.

QWhat key difference does the article highlight between the market performance on May 11th and the initial rallies on May 6th-7th?

AOn May 11th, the rally shifted from purely 'storage' tokens (like FIL, AR, STORJ) to a broader 'AI infrastructure' theme, including AI inference compute (VVV), on-chain data networks (Chainbase), data indexing (SQD), and user data DAOs (Vana). In contrast, the initial rallies on May 6th-7th were more focused on traditional decentralized storage龙头 tokens. Furthermore, on May 11th, actual storage projects like AIOZ Network and Chia saw minimal gains (<4%), indicating资金 was becoming more selective, focusing on projects with stronger narratives beyond just the storage beta.

QWhat is the primary external driver identified for the rallies in the crypto AI/data infrastructure sector throughout the discussed period?

AThe primary external driver is the capital spillover from the 'super cycle' boom in U.S. stock market storage chip companies, specifically the massive gains seen in stocks like美光科技 (Micron) and闪迪 (SanDisk). The article states that the logic is that AI infrastructure's huge demand for storage capacity, which has already driven up prices and valuations in traditional markets, is now being repriced into crypto tokens that represent 'on-chain storage' and related AI data infrastructure.

QAccording to the article, what does the current market structure (with selective gains in narrative-driven tokens) suggest about the stage of the sector's rally?

AThe article suggests that the market structure, moving from 'leader catch-up' to 'concept diffusion' and then to 'capital picking specific stories,' typically indicates the sector rally is entering its later stages. The sustainability from this point forward will depend more on whether the U.S. stock market storage hype continues and on the individual fundamentals of the crypto projects, rather than on broad, indiscriminate buying across the entire sector.

Related Reads

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit2h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit2h ago

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

**"Spicy Commentary": Three Tales of Crypto's Wild Week** This week's "Spicy Commentary" column highlights three dramatic stories from the cryptocurrency world. First, **MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor** addressed the controversy over his company potentially selling Bitcoin. At the BTC Prague event, he clarified, "I never said the company can't sell Bitcoin. I told *you* never to sell *your* Bitcoin." This "do as I say, not as I do" stance was criticized by netizens as peak linguistic gymnastics, noting a history of him previously stating the company would "never" sell. Second, a **bizarre fraud case** emerged from Beijing. A 60-year-old woman, obsessed with getting rich from crypto but unwilling to risk her own savings, posed online as the 20-something "god-daughter" of a high-ranking official. She catfished a young man, convincing him to give her over 200,000 yuan for fabricated emergencies. She then invested all the stolen money into cryptocurrency with 10x leverage, only to lose everything in a market crash. The woman was sentenced to four years in prison for fraud. Finally, a **sobering trader's tale** surfaced on Reddit. A user posted "Tale of a crypto trader," confessing their net worth had plummeted from a peak of $45 million to roughly $17,200, primarily due to holding meme coins too long. The post, described as a crypto "book of confessions," sparked reactions ranging from sympathy to critique about greed, poor risk management, and the perils of treating meme coins as long-term investments instead of taking profits. The column concludes that this week featured masterful rhetoric, elaborate scams, and extreme financial volatility, stitching together another chapter in crypto's unpredictable theater.

Foresight News3h ago

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

Foresight News3h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

Trembling, Humans: AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint Yes, AI is still rapidly accelerating. While deep learning seemed to stall quickly in its early years, large models after years of development show no sign of hitting their ceiling. At the Zhiyuan Conference 2026, the focus is on enabling AI to move from the digital world into the physical world. Scaling Law remains effective, continuing to drive advancements in both large language models and multimodal models. The industry is now entering a phase of pursuing World Models, though unresolved technical paths and data issues mean this exploration may take 3-5 more years. Concurrently, breakthroughs in Agents are accelerating AI's real-world application in fields like healthcare and meetings. Making Agents truly useful requires key hardware-software co-design, evident from the strong presence of chip vendors at the conference. We stand at a new historical threshold where AI is becoming a foundational force reshaping the world. The first day of the conference highlighted AI's evolution from "knowing how to chat" to "knowing how to work." Scaling Law persists, World Models are the next key battleground, and Agents are transitioning from usable to好用 (user-friendly). Scaling Law is not ending but diversifying. New models like Anthropic's Fable 5 demonstrate scaling through parameter size, synthetic data, and reinforcement learning. Advancements in AI Coding and Agent deployment are enabling a trend of AI self-evolution, potentially allowing AI to take over digital world iterations. World Models represent the next frontier for large models extending into the physical realm, but no current model is truly impressive at solving real-world problems. Technical consensus is lacking, with debates on data sources (video, simulation, real-world). Different approaches are emerging: language-centric, pixel-centric, 3D-structure-centric, and visual-representation-centric models. Zhiyuan Institute is exploring a fifth path: unified latent space modeling fusing language and visual representations, and introduced its own under-development World Model, Physis-v0.1. On the product side, Agents are key to bringing AI into daily life. Since 2025, the "Year of the Agent," products have become more proactive and capable of complex tasks. Zhiyuan showcased four vertical Agents for cardiac diagnosis, autonomous research, meeting summarization, and protein risk discovery. However, technical challenges remain, particularly in context engineering like memory and orchestration. "Harness" – the engineering framework around an Agent – is crucial for maximizing its capabilities by clarifying intent, designing workflows, and incorporating validation and feedback. In summary, AI's breakneck pace continues on multiple fronts: foundational model scaling, the ambitious pursuit of World Models for physical understanding, and the ongoing refinement of practical Agents. The journey from capable to truly reliable and useful AI systems is well underway.

marsbit3h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

marsbit3h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

Elon Musk becomes the world's first trillionaire, driven by SpaceX's IPO valuing the company at $1.77 trillion. However, his vast wealth is largely illiquid: he holds over 85% voting control, likely through super-voting shares that are subject to lock-ups and selling restrictions. While his net worth surpasses $1 trillion across SpaceX, Tesla, and private holdings, only a tiny fraction (potentially under 2% annually) could be converted to cash without jeopardizing control and market confidence. SpaceX's IPO also creates paper millionaires for roughly 4,400 employees, but their holdings face lock-up periods, exercise costs, and taxes, delaying and reducing actual cash proceeds. Only 4.2% of total shares are initially available for public trading, making the stock price highly sensitive to limited net buying or selling pressure. A major test will come when lock-ups expire for the remaining 96% of shares. The article contrasts SpaceX's wealth distribution with potential AI IPOs. Anthropic and OpenAI could generate employee wealth pools 20 times larger than SpaceX's in paper value, due to their higher valuations relative to revenue and potentially more distributed ownership. However, sustaining those high price-to-sales multiples post-IPO is uncertain. A key financial puzzle for SpaceX investors is its xAI unit. While it has locked in an estimated $26 billion in annual compute revenue from clients like Anthropic and Google, the unit reported a $6.4 billion loss in 2025. More critically, estimated annual capital expenditures of ~$30.8 billion exceed that revenue. The long-term viability of SpaceX's AI narrative hinges on whether this compute income can eventually cover the unit's massive ongoing investments and losses.

链捕手3h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片