US Jobs, China PMI, and Inflation on Stage: Can Global Growth Maintain Resilience?

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-24Last updated on 2026-08-24

Abstract

**Week 36 Macro Outlook: Key Data to Test Global Growth Resilience** The week from August 31 to September 6 will shift focus from policy discussions to a critical test of global economic activity. The sequence of events is key, starting with China's official August PMI on Aug 31, which will provide early signals on factory orders, services, and employment following July's contraction. The data flow then broadens. On September 1, US ISM Manufacturing PMI and the Eurozone's flash inflation estimate will offer simultaneous checks on demand, prices, and regional divergence. The subsequent US Federal Reserve Beige Book on September 2 adds granular, qualitative evidence on consumer spending, wages, and regional conditions. Australian Q2 GDP and Canadian trade and jobs data will test resilience in other major economies. The week's pivotal event, however, is the US August employment report on September 4. It will decisively influence expectations for interest rates, the US dollar, and broader risk appetite, acting as a final cross-check for the preceding data. The core question for markets is whether global growth can remain resilient. An ideal outcome would combine a rebound in China's PMI, stable US jobs growth, cooling inflation, and signs of a gradual demand slowdown. Conversely, weak Chinese manufacturing, sticky Eurozone prices, and disappointing US non-farm payrolls would create a more complex scenario of reduced corporate confidence and limited room for aggressive monetar...

Key Points

· Week 36 of 2026 (August 31 - September 6) will see the macro focus shift from late-summer policy interpretation to a new round of testing for global economic activity.

· China will release official manufacturing and non-manufacturing PMIs on August 31, providing the first significant signals on factory new orders, service demand, employment, and price pressures.

· The US and Eurozone will release key manufacturing and inflation data on September 1, with the Fed's Beige Book on September 2 supplementing regional evidence on demand, wages, and pricing.

· Australia's Q2 national accounts and Canada's trade and employment data will test whether economies outside the US can sustain growth.

· The US August jobs report on September 4 is the most influential event of the week, potentially shifting expectations for Treasury yields, the dollar, equity market leadership, commodities, and crypto asset liquidity simultaneously.

Quick Conclusion

The core question for Week 36 is: can global growth maintain resilience as manufacturing, inflation, and jobs data are released almost concurrently? An ideal combination would be a rebound in China's PMI, stable US employment, cooling inflation, and a Beige Book showing demand is slowing gradually, not abruptly. If China's manufacturing data is weak, Eurozone price stickiness persists, and US non-farm payrolls miss expectations, markets will face a more complex situation: corporate profit confidence declines, room for aggressive easing is limited, and cyclical assets face greater pressure.

Why Week 36 Matters

The week opens with regional growth signals and closes with the labor data the global market cares most about. China's PMI will be released before Western markets have fully digested the previous week's positioning, so its new orders and employment components may influence the opening tone for Asian stocks, industrial metals, the renminbi, and risk assets. The subsequent US jobs report will then determine whether the market's existing rate assumptions can hold after cross-verification with inflation, manufacturing, and central bank regional surveys. This means Asian markets may first trade on Chinese demand, while US and European markets then reassess rates and liquidity based on US employment. Initial reactions may differ across regions; the key is whether subsequent data pulls them back onto the same growth narrative. The sequence from Chinese data to US jobs is not simply a calendar arrangement but a continuous verification process: can the early-week demand signal gain confirmation from price trends, regional activity, and the labor market, ultimately altering policy expectations and asset pricing?

This sequence is important because a single data point can be misleading. Strong US payrolls are truly beneficial for the demand outlook only when wage pressures and inflation expectations remain contained. Similarly, improvement in China's headline PMI carries more weight if accompanied by simultaneous rebounds in new orders, service activity, and private-sector confidence. Therefore, Week 36 is not suitable for simply switching risk appetite based on a single headline; one should look for mutual confirmation across different data systems. If the data diverge, markets may switch between cyclical stocks, bonds, and the dollar rather than forming a sustained one-way trend. Thus, confirmation relationships deserve more attention than any single beat or miss. Even if yields fall, if orders and employment are also deteriorating, the cause may be growth fears rather than benign financial condition easing. Markets are more likely to continually assess whether the signals are consistent rather than just trading the initial direction after each data release.

China Signals First

China's National Bureau of Statistics plans to release the August PMIs at 9:30 Beijing time on Monday, August 31. The manufacturing index and its components—production, new orders, new export orders, employment, and input prices—will show whether industrial momentum is stabilizing. The non-manufacturing survey covers construction and services and is crucial for judging whether domestic demand is diffusing beyond export-related production. These sub-indices can also help distinguish between external and domestic demand. If services improve while manufacturing export orders remain weak, the growth recovery may stem more from domestic activity; if both improve simultaneously, the support for global trade and industrial chains is more comprehensive. Within manufacturing, whether new orders and employment improve in sync; and within services, whether business activity and new business rebound are key. If the headline index moves close to the expansion-contraction line but these components remain weak, companies may be relying more on inventory adjustments or cost controls rather than genuine sales expansion.

China's official July manufacturing PMI was 49.2, below the 50 threshold, making the August result more than a routine monthly update—it's a directional test. A rebound in new orders and service activity could support copper, iron ore, Asian equities, and global growth expectations. Another weak reading would likely extend margin pressures and reinforce market expectations for targeted policy support. Even a slight rebound should be examined for whether the improvement extends to the order, employment, and service components, rather than mistaking a one-time inventory change for a cyclical reversal. Market expectations for policy support will also depend on whether weakness is concentrated in certain sectors. Therefore, investors should not just judge whether the index crosses above 50, but also observe the breadth and structure of the recovery. If orders lead production improvement and employment remains stable, the quality of demand is more credible; if only production rebounds, sustainability still requires confirmation from subsequent data.

Week 36 Global Macro Calendar

Date

Region

Scheduled Event

Why Markets Care

Aug 31

China

August Official Manufacturing & Non-Manufacturing PMI

Provides the week's first evidence on factory orders, services, construction, employment, prices, the renminbi, Asian stocks, and industrial commodities.

Sep 1

US

August ISM Manufacturing PMI

Tests orders, production, employment, supply conditions, and input price pressures ahead of the jobs report.

Sep 1

Eurozone

August Inflation Flash

May reshape European rates, the euro, bank stocks, and regional real income prospects.

Sep 2

US

Fed Beige Book

Provides regional evidence on consumption, labor, wages, prices, credit, real estate, and manufacturing.

Sep 2

Australia

Q2 National Accounts

Tests domestic consumption, investment, trade, the AUD, Australian rates, and regional linkages to Chinese growth.

Sep 3

US

August ISM Services PMI

Tests the larger service economy via business activity, new orders, employment, and prices ahead of non-farm payrolls.

Sep 3

Canada

July International Merchandise Trade

Links North American demand to energy, manufacturing, trade balance, and CAD performance.

Sep 4

US

August Employment Report

Covers non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate, wages, labor force participation, and revisions; the week's biggest rate volatility catalyst.

Sep 4

Canada

August Labor Force Survey

Provides an external labor market test for North American growth and Bank of Canada expectations.

First Two Sessions Set the Global Growth Baseline

Following China's PMI, the US ISM Manufacturing PMI and Eurozone inflation flash will be released on September 1. The ISM report should focus on new orders, production, employment, supplier deliveries, and prices paid. A manufacturing rebound with cooling prices favors cyclical assets; if orders fail to strengthen while prices remain firm, it suggests firms are bearing cost pressure without corresponding demand growth. This also provides early clues about potential corporate profit improvement. Order expansion coupled with a decline in prices paid typically supports earnings expectations for cyclical sectors more than output recovery alone; the opposite may squeeze margins. It's important to distinguish between a joint rebound in orders and production versus only price pressures remaining elevated. The latter implies the Fed, even if concerned about slowing growth, may struggle to ease quickly due to inflation constraints, leaving the initial optimistic risk asset reaction lacking a demand foundation.

The Eurozone inflation flash is another policy test. Eurostat data showed the annual inflation rate rose from 2.8% in June to 2.9% in July; the August flash is scheduled for September 1. Markets will look beyond the headline number, analyzing energy, food, services, and core price trends. A slowdown in services inflation could revive hopes for policy flexibility; another acceleration would keep European rates highly sensitive to upside inflation risks. Services prices are closer to domestic demand and wage pressures, while core inflation helps judge whether cooling is broad-based. If only volatile energy items decline, the policy space may not be as large as the headline suggests. Pay particular attention to the direction of services and core inflation. If the headline decline mainly stems from energy base effects, its implications for real incomes and policy paths may be limited, and easing expectations unsupported by component trends are more prone to reversal.

Manufacturing Strength Must Possess Breadth

The US and Chinese surveys should be compared across the same dimensions: new orders, employment, output, and prices. If orders improve in both economies, the demand impulse may transmit to industrial metals, freight, machinery, and exporters. If output improves but employment and orders lag, it more likely reflects inventory or supply normalization rather than durable demand. Also, watch whether improvements cover private enterprises and service-related demand. Output increases concentrated in a few large firms may not be enough to drive employment, wages, and a broader consumption cycle. This comparison is not a mechanical check of absolute index levels but an assessment of whether direction, scope, and internal structure are aligned. Synchronized order improvement in both countries increases the credibility of a cyclical recovery; if only one side improves, explanations involving policy stimulus, inventory changes, or regional divergence must be kept in mind.

This distinction also matters for equities. Semiconductors and software stocks can tolerate mixed manufacturing reports if financial conditions ease; but small caps, banks, materials, and machinery need evidence of real business volume improvement. In commodity markets, copper and crude oil need credible demand confirmation; gold is more directly influenced by real yields, the dollar, and defensive positioning. For investors, whether sector rotation broadens is more informative than index moves on the day. If gains are concentrated only in high-valuation tech stocks, evidence for a cyclical recovery remains limited; if banks, materials, and machinery also participate, the demand assessment is more reliable. Thus, the same manufacturing data may trigger different asset reactions. Long-duration growth stocks initially trade on discount rate changes, while cyclical stocks and industrial commodities need orders, sales volume, and credit conditions jointly confirming that real demand is expanding.

Beige Book and Australian GDP Add Regional Evidence

The Fed's September schedule lists the Beige Book release for September 2. The report aggregates information on consumer spending, labor availability, wages, prices, real estate, manufacturing, and credit from the twelve Fed districts. It won't provide a single national number but can indicate whether weakness is spreading across regions or remains concentrated in rate-sensitive sectors. This regional information can reveal divergences masked by national averages, e.g., some districts still seeing decent consumption while housing and manufacturing have clearly cooled. For rate-sensitive assets, such divergence itself is a risk indicator. The Beige Book doesn't move markets with a single number but supplements the changes felt by businesses and regional contacts. If weakness in the same industry appears repeatedly across multiple districts, it suggests the national data may reflect a broader trend, not short-term noise.

The Beige Book follows the ISM and Eurozone inflation data, so feedback from regional firms and institutions can help interpret the volatility of the first two sessions. If the report shows discretionary spending slowing, hiring difficulty easing, or price increases moderating, it would reinforce the gradual disinflation narrative. If wage and service price pressures persist, even amid headline inflation improvement, the comfort level for a soft landing diminishes. If demand slowdown is mainly in discretionary spending while staples remain stable, pressure on corporate revenues may first concentrate in retail and leisure services. If it spreads to housing, credit, and manufacturing, the growth risk becomes more systemic. It's also important to distinguish between a decline in total consumption versus consumers shifting to cheaper goods and services. The latter implies demand still exists, but corporate margins and pricing power may weaken, leading to different implications for stock earnings and interest rates.

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics' future releases calendar, Q2 national accounts are scheduled for 11:30 Canberra time on September 2. Consumption, housing, government demand, business investment, and trade will influence the Reserve Bank of Australia's policy response. Australia is closely linked to China via commodities and regional trade. Therefore, if domestic data is weak and coupled with soft Chinese PMIs, the negative impact on the AUD and mining stocks would be greater than from either signal alone. The combination of trade and investment is particularly important: export volumes may hold steady, but if domestic investment and consumption slip, the economy's internal momentum may still be insufficient. The AUD and mining stocks thus face a dual test from both Chinese and domestic demand. Conversely, if consumption and investment remain resilient, even if Chinese demand is slightly weaker, the Australian economy may still demonstrate a buffer. Therefore, Australia's GDP is not just a domestic datapoint but also an important gauge of whether Chinese growth and the commodity chain are transmitting to the real economy.

Regional Confirmation Can Alter Policy Interpretation

Synchronous slowdown can push yields lower but doesn't automatically favor risk assets. If the slowdown is orderly and inflation recedes, bonds and quality growth stocks may benefit; if accompanied by falling orders, weakening employment, and deteriorating credit, the reason markets price in lower rates is because earnings risks are rising. Low rates alone are not a sufficient condition for asset appreciation; the key is whether the yield decline coincides with stable cash flow expectations. If corporate earnings expectations continue to be revised down, bond rallies can occur alongside stock market pressure. Yield declines occurring in the context of stable growth versus declines in response to recession risks lead to completely different asset allocation outcomes. The former may bring broad participation in stocks and commodities, while the latter is more likely to accompany defensive positioning and earnings downgrades.

This distinction is particularly important for crypto assets. Lower yields and a weaker dollar can support BTC and ETH, provided liquidity improvement isn't accompanied by large-scale de-risking liquidation. If a growth shock prompts investors to move to cash, it could override the mechanical benefit from policy easing expectations. Crypto assets are more sensitive to changes in risk appetite; when capital exits high-volatility positions, valuation support from lower rates can quickly be offset. Without improvement in spot buying and stablecoin liquidity, the foundation for a rebound is fragile. Therefore, crypto markets should also observe spot demand, trading volume, and market breadth, not just rate futures. If BTC and ETH rise without corresponding spot volume and broader token participation, the rally may be driven mainly by leverage; if liquidity and spot markets improve in sync, sustainability is stronger.

US Jobs Report Determines if the Week's Signals Align

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics plans to release the August employment report at 8:30 AM ET on Friday, September 4. Non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate, average hourly earnings, labor force participation, and revisions will determine whether the Fed can respond to cooling inflation without signaling concern about a sharper economic slowdown. As the jobs report simultaneously impacts yields, the dollar, and risk appetite, it may trigger the week's final large-scale repricing. Market breadth following the data will help judge whether the shock is localized or cross-asset. Markets will also scrutinize prior-month revisions and participation rate. Even if monthly payrolls appear strong, if revisions are consistently down and participation falls, the true resilience of the labor market may be weaker than the headline figure.

Non-farm payrolls should be analyzed alongside the ISM employment component and the Beige Book. Moderate job growth, a stable participation rate, and slowing wage growth align with a controlled deceleration. Strong employment with accelerating wages, especially if Eurozone inflation is also firm, could push yields and the dollar higher. A weak report would boost rate cut expectations, but the market reaction depends on whether this is normalization or a crack in household income foundations. If payrolls miss expectations but participation rises and wages remain moderate, markets may view it as normalization amid improving supply; if employment, participation, and wages all deteriorate, it's closer to a substantive risk to income and demand. The same payroll gain, if accompanied by expanding labor supply, may have limited wage pressure; if driven by renewed overheated hiring demand, the rate path will be tighter. This distinction will influence the dollar's direction and the equity market's sector leadership.

The September 3 ISM Services PMI is the final corporate-side test before non-farm payrolls. Services account for a larger share of US economic activity, and the survey's employment and price indices directly link to the Fed's dual mandate. Strong service orders alongside receding prices is a positive combination; weakening employment with persistent price pressure would signal stagflation concerns. Services data also connects consumption to corporate revenue, thus helping judge whether manufacturing weakness might spread. Stable orders with receding prices would support the soft-landing narrative more than a mere rise in the business activity index. Even if manufacturing is weak, as long as services remain stable, overall growth may avoid a sharp decline; but if service orders and employment also weaken in sync, warnings for household income and corporate revenue would expand significantly.

Canada's September 3 trade balance and September 4 labor force survey provide useful external validation. Employment, wages, participation, and industry structure will affect Bank of Canada expectations and the CAD, while trade results link domestic demand to energy and global goods flows. If Canadian employment is weak and combined with soft US payrolls, the growth alarm interpretation strengthens; if Canadian data is stronger, it suggests the slowdown is not globally uniform. Canada's industry structure can also help identify whether energy and manufacturing shocks are confined to a specific region. Concurrent weakness in trade and employment would provide more convincing evidence of North American demand slowing than any single datapoint. Canadian data isn't a simple replica of US figures but an independent test from the perspective of energy, manufacturing, and North American trade. Differences in industry employment structure can help judge whether shocks are regional or spreading across North America.

Cross-Asset Market Impact Matrix

Macro Scenario

Crypto Assets

Equities

Commodities

FX & Rates

China PMI improves, inflation cools, US jobs stable

Declining real yield pressure and improving liquidity can support BTC and ETH once spot demand is confirmed.

Cyclicals, semiconductors, financials, and China-sensitive exporters may jointly broaden market leadership.

Copper, iron ore, and crude oil gain demand support; gold can hold steady as real yields fall.

UST yields moderately decline, USD selectively weakens, CNY, AUD, and CAD gain confirmation.

China PMI weak, US jobs robust, inflation sticky

Even with stable US demand, high yields and narrow market breadth pressure crypto asset leverage positions.

Quality growth and defensive sectors may outperform materials, small caps, and China-sensitive stocks.

Gold benefits from defensive demand; industrial metals and crude oil face demand concerns.

USD and US front-end yields rise; CNY and AUD remain vulnerable.

Global manufacturing weak, jobs cool, inflation recedes

Easing expectations improve liquidity, but diminished risk appetite caps upside and increases volatility.

Bonds and quality growth stocks may outperform cyclicals; earnings downgrades become central.

Gold may outperform copper and crude oil as growth risks rise.

Bonds rally; USD depends on safe-haven demand; high-beta currencies weaken.

Orders rebound, wages and services inflation accelerate

Robust activity is offset by restrictive rate expectations and higher funding costs.

Banks and value stocks may outperform long-duration growth; rate-sensitive housing lags.

Industrial commodities gain demand support, but rising real yields are a headwind for gold.

Yields and USD rise; yield curve may flatten if policy stays restrictive.

What Traders Should Watch Next

First, focus on China's new orders, service activity, and employment, not just the headline PMI. On September 1, compare US ISM orders and prices with the composition of Eurozone inflation. The subsequent Beige Book will show whether the early-week information also appears in regional spending, hiring, and credit conditions. Australian GDP and Canadian data then cross-verify Chinese and US signals. This sequence allows investors to update hypotheses incrementally with each datapoint rather than betting on the entire week's direction in one go. Confidence in positioning should increase only if different data points reinforce each other. Following this sequence, investors can update their original assumptions after each release. Even if an indicator deviates unexpectedly, one should wait to see if other data confirm the same direction, reducing whipsaws and premature position adjustments.

Friday's US non-farm payrolls is the final decision point, but real yields, the dollar, equity market breadth, copper, crude oil, gold, and crypto spot demand should provide confirmation. Moves driven by futures leverage without cash market support have weaker sustainability. The most robust risk environment requires simultaneous improvement in economic activity and receding inflation; the most fragile environment features deteriorating orders and employment, with any rally relying solely on falling yields. If equities, industrial metals, FX, and crypto spot are all reflecting the same set of growth and inflation signals, the move typically has greater breadth. Conversely, if only futures leverage or a few large assets are rising, it suggests the market still lacks genuine cash flow confirmation. If multiple asset classes are pricing the same growth-inflation narrative, price discovery is more likely to be broad and stable. Traders should not only note market direction but also confirm which regions, sectors, and spot markets are supporting it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most important event in Week 36?

The US August employment report on September 4 has the greatest influence, but its significance depends on signals conveyed earlier by China's PMI, US ISM, Eurozone inflation, and the Beige Book.

Why is China's PMI so important at the start of the week?

It is the first significant test of factory orders, service activity, employment, and prices since the July manufacturing PMI fell below 50. It may influence Asian stocks, the renminbi, industrial metals, and global growth expectations.

How should the US jobs report be interpreted?

Non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate, labor force participation, wage growth, and revisions must be considered together. Strong employment amid cooling wages has different implications than accelerating hiring and wage pressure simultaneously.

What additional information does the Beige Book provide?

It provides regional, on-the-ground evidence on spending, hiring, wages, prices, credit, real estate, and manufacturing, helping judge whether national data reflect a broad trend or localized effects in certain sectors.

How might Week 36 impact crypto markets?

Real yields, the dollar, liquidity expectations, and the breadth of risk appetite are most important. Easing expectations can support crypto assets, but a growth shock or broad deleveraging could offset this benefit.

Related Questions

QWhat are the three key events to watch at the beginning of Week 36, according to the article, and what signals do they provide?

AAccording to the article, the three key events are: 1) China's official Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing PMIs on August 31, which provide the first important signal on factory new orders, service demand, employment, and price pressures. 2) US ISM Manufacturing PMI on September 1, which tests order, production, employment, and input price pressure before the US jobs report. 3) Eurozone Flash Inflation for August on September 1, which may reshape European interest rate, euro, and real income expectations.

QWhy does the article emphasize that the event sequence from China's data to the US jobs report is 'a set of continuous verification'?

AThe article emphasizes this sequence because it is not just a schedule arrangement. It represents a process of continuous verification: early-week demand signals (from China) need to be confirmed by subsequent data on price levels (Eurozone inflation), regional economic conditions (Fed Beige Book), and the labor market (US jobs report). This cross-validation is crucial for shaping policy expectations and asset pricing more reliably, rather than reacting to a single, potentially misleading data point.

QWhat combination of data from the US ISM Manufacturing PMI is considered positive for cyclical assets?

AA positive combination for cyclical assets from the US ISM Manufacturing PMI is a manufacturing rebound coupled with cooling input prices. Specifically, expansion in new orders alongside a retreat in input prices is seen as supportive for the earnings outlook of cyclical sectors, as it suggests stronger demand without corresponding cost pressures that could squeeze profit margins.

QAccording to the 'Cross-Asset Market Impact' table, what is the likely impact on various asset classes if the global scenario features 'Chinese PMI improvement, cooling inflation, and stable US employment'?

AUnder the scenario of 'Chinese PMI improvement, cooling inflation, and stable US employment', the likely impacts are: Crypto assets (BTC/ETH): Supported by lower real yields and improved liquidity, pending confirmation of spot demand. Equities: Cyclical stocks, semiconductors, financials, and China-sensitive exporters may participate, broadening market leadership. Commodities: Copper, iron ore, and crude oil gain demand support; gold can remain stable as real yields fall. Forex & Rates: US Treasury yields decline moderately, the US dollar selectively weakens, while CNY, AUD, and CAD gain confirmation.

QWhat does the article caution about interpreting a potential drop in bond yields (lower interest rates) during Week 36?

AThe article cautions that a drop in bond yields (lower interest rates) is not automatically positive for risk assets. The key is *why* yields are falling. If yields fall due to orderly growth slowdown alongside receding inflation, bonds and quality growth stocks may benefit. However, if yields fall because of rising recession risks, indicated by deteriorating orders, employment, and credit conditions, the lower rates reflect heightened earnings risk. In this case, lower rates may coincide with stock market pressure, as the decline is driven by growth concerns rather than a benign easing of financial conditions.

Related Reads

Fields Medalist Stumped, Claude Solves 78-Year Mystery, Possibly the Most Important AI Achievement in Mathematics

A 78-year-old mathematical problem—whether the six-dimensional sphere (S6) admits a complex structure—has been answered affirmatively in just three days by Harvard mathematician Levent Alpöge with the assistance of Claude, an AI system. The work constructs an explicit complex manifold X and rigorously proves it is diffeomorphic to S6, bypassing decades of inconclusive theoretical debate. Previous attempts by distinguished mathematicians, including Fields Medalist Michael Atiyah, had fallen short. The 108-page proof details a novel geometric construction: starting with a (3,4,∞) triangle group acting on the upper half-plane to form a base sphere with three singular points, then attaching a family of complex 2-tori over most points. The three singularities are filled using distinct classical techniques (Mumford's toric degeneration and Kodaira's logarithmic transformations with multiplicities 3 and 4). The resulting compact complex threefold X is shown to be simply connected with trivial fundamental group, matching the homology of S6. Applying established results by Smale, and Kervaire & Milnor, it is concluded that X is indeed the standard smooth 6-sphere. This achievement is part of a rapid series of breakthroughs by Alpöge using Claude, including a claimed counterexample to the 87-year-old Jacobian conjecture in July and significant progress on the Riemann zeta function in early August. Experts note that while prior AI contributions involved searching or combining existing results, this work represents the active *creation* of a new mathematical object. If verified, it stands as a landmark demonstration of AI's potential in fundamental research.

marsbit22m ago

Fields Medalist Stumped, Claude Solves 78-Year Mystery, Possibly the Most Important AI Achievement in Mathematics

marsbit22m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片