Trump’s Crypto Deals May Have Increased The Family Fortune By $2 Billion—At Investors’ Expense

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

A Reuters investigation alleges the Trump family generated approximately $2.3 billion from four main crypto ventures, while investors in those projects incurred roughly equivalent losses. The primary source was World Liberty Financial token sales, estimated to have yielded over $1.4 billion for the family. Significant gains also came from sales of the TRUMP memecoin, calculated at over $1.2 billion, and from related corporate partnerships. Investors, however, faced substantial losses. Early World Liberty token buyers faced restrictions on selling most holdings, and post-listing price declines contributed to estimated investor losses of $674 million. TRUMP coin buyers, who spent at least $1.2 billion, saw the value plummet, implying over $700 million in losses. Additionally, sharp share price drops for associated public companies ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin left investors down about $875 million combined.

A new investigation by Reuters alleges that the Trump family has generated $2.3 billion from its four main crypto ventures, while investors in those projects have absorbed losses of a similar magnitude, amounting to roughly $2.3 billion, including paper losses, by the end of April.

World Liberty Sales

The investigation describes World Liberty Financial’s token fundraising as the largest component of the Trump family’s alleged crypto windfall. World Liberty has disclosed raising $1.4 billion by selling 30 billion WLFI tokens, which Reuters says yielded roughly $987 million for the Trump family.

However, Reuters argues that the Trump family’s earnings from World Liberty token sales may be higher than the disclosed estimate. The outlet says that in an October 2025 filing tied to European crypto sales regulations, World Liberty reported it held 3 billion fewer tokens than it previously stated publicly.

Using a weighted average of token prices during the relevant period, Reuters calculates that if sold, those tokens would have generated at least $460 million for the Trump family.

Reuters says these likely additional sales would bring total Trump family earnings from World Liberty token sales to more than $1.4 billion, representing the largest share of the $2.3 billion overall figure cited in the investigation.

TRUMP Memecoin Cashout

For the President’s official memecoin, Reuters used blockchain data to trace gains from coin sales across online marketplaces and to identify coin movements to crypto exchanges.

The investigation says movements to exchanges strongly suggest sales, and it attributes that method to experts, including finance and computing professors, a law professor, and an industry analyst.

Reuters reports that using weighted average prices during the periods when coins were moved to exchanges, it calculated that those movements—if they represented sales—raised more than $880 million. Reuters says total revenue, including sales through other channels, was about $1.2 billion.

Reuters also details token flows involving ALT5 Sigma and World Liberty Financial. It says ALT5 Sigma, transformed into a crypto acquisition vehicle, partnered with World Liberty Financial to buy $717 million worth of World Liberty tokens. This purchase allegedly sent more than $500 million to the Trump family.

Beyond token sales, Reuters says it found that Eric Trump’s stake was worth over $70 million at the end of April, while it says the value of Donald Trump Jr.’s stake was not disclosed.

The report also states that Hut 8 Corp, the Trump family’s partner in the venture, bought $25 million of World Liberty tokens shortly after the company launched, sending about $19 million to the Trump family.

Crypto Investor Losses

To estimate investor losses, Reuters says it compared what initial buyers paid for TRUMP and World Liberty tokens and for new shares in ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin against the current market values.

For investors in World Liberty governance tokens, Reuters says early purchasers paid either $1.5 or $0.5 per token. Those early buyers may have profited on tokens they sold after trading began on crypto exchanges, but Reuters notes they were restricted from selling 80% of their holdings.

Reuters says that for tokens bought after exchange trading began, prices have fallen as well. Altogether, Reuters estimates losses for investors in World Liberty tokens total about $674 million.

Reuters says buyers spent at least $1.2 billion on TRUMP, at prices up to $75.35. Using the April 30 price of $2.38, the report says those coins were worth $521 million, implying a loss of more than $700 million for buyers.

For the Nasdaq-listed companies, Reuters reports that ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin disclosed the number of shares sold and the money they raised through the end of March 2026.

Since August of last year, Reuters says ALT5’s share price fell sharply, leaving investors down about $675 million. It says American Bitcoin’s shares dropped from $11 to $1.15 by the end of April after declining since September, leaving investors down more than $200 million.

The 1D chart shows TRUMP’s price crash to $1.6. Source: TRUMPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QAccording to the Reuters investigation, how much total profit did the Trump family allegedly generate from its crypto ventures, and what was the approximate total loss for investors?

AThe investigation alleges that the Trump family generated $2.3 billion from its crypto ventures, while investors absorbed losses of a similar magnitude, roughly $2.3 billion by the end of April.

QWhich venture is described as the largest contributor to the Trump family's alleged crypto windfall, and what was the reported fundraising amount and Trump family earnings from it?

AWorld Liberty Financial's token fundraising is described as the largest component. It disclosed raising $1.4 billion by selling WLFI tokens, which reportedly yielded roughly $987 million for the Trump family, with potential additional sales bringing the total to over $1.4 billion.

QWhat method did Reuters use to estimate gains from the TRUMP memecoin sales, and what was the total estimated revenue from this coin?

AReuters used blockchain data to trace coin movements to crypto exchanges, which strongly suggest sales. Using weighted average prices during those periods, it calculated that these movements raised over $880 million, with total revenue from all channels reaching about $1.2 billion.

QHow did Reuters calculate the estimated losses for investors who bought the TRUMP memecoin?

AReuters compared what initial buyers paid for TRUMP tokens (at least $1.2 billion at prices up to $75.35) against the market value on April 30 ($2.38 per token, totaling $521 million). This implied a loss of more than $700 million for buyers.

QWhat were the reported investor losses for the Nasdaq-listed companies ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin according to the article?

AFor ALT5 Sigma, investors were down about $675 million due to a sharp share price fall since August. For American Bitcoin, shares dropped from $11 to $1.15 by the end of April, leaving investors down more than $200 million.

Related Reads

12.9 Million Candidates: The First Summer of Fate in the Hands of AI

The 2026 Chinese college entrance exam, or Gaokao, saw a novel phenomenon: AI aggressively entering the college application advice arena before results were even released. Major tech companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, and others launched free AI-powered "agents" and tools designed to generate personalized university and major recommendations for over 12.9 million candidates. For years, a lucrative industry thrived on the "information gap" in college applications, with personalized consulting services costing families thousands of dollars. AI is now disrupting this by providing similar, data-driven analysis for free. These tools process standardized data—scores, rankings, historical admission trends—to create tailored application strategies, offering a form of information parity previously unavailable, especially to students from rural or less-resourced backgrounds. This shift represents more than just a marketing trend; it signifies AI's first large-scale entry into a critical, high-stakes life decision for millions of Chinese families. The Gaokao application, with its clear inputs and outputs, is an ideal scenario for AI. Its involvement begins to level the informational playing field, potentially reducing the advantage held by families with greater social capital or access to expensive consultants. However, the article raises a profound question: while AI can optimize choices for employability and financial return based on cold data, it risks promoting a homogenized, utilitarian path. It might steer a passionate student away from a less lucrative field like literature or archaeology toward supposedly "safer" options like computer science. The core dilemma remains: as AI flattens information disparities, does it also flatten the diversity of life choices and the freedom to make—and learn from—mistakes? Ultimately, 2026 may be remembered not for exam questions, but as the year AI began formally influencing the life trajectories of ordinary Chinese people. The real test lies not in the algorithm's recommendations, but in whether individuals will retain the courage to make their own choices and bear the consequences in an increasingly algorithmic age.

marsbit42m ago

12.9 Million Candidates: The First Summer of Fate in the Hands of AI

marsbit42m ago

IC3 Top Universities Collaborative Analysis: Is AI x Crypto the Real Future or Just a Narrative Bubble?

IC3 researchers from leading universities analyze the convergence of AI and crypto. They argue meaningful integration is still nascent, with hype often outstripping progress. The report frames AI as a "translation middleware" making blockchain accessible, while crypto serves as a "trust middleware" via tools like ZK proofs and TEEs for integrity, availability, and confidentiality. Two main directions are examined: 1) **Crypto x AI**: Using AI to enhance blockchain via analysis (fraud detection), algorithmic design, and AI oracles (with accuracy varying by task). New risks include AI-driven malicious smart contracts. 2) **AI x Crypto**: Using crypto to enhance AI via decentralized infrastructure (DePIN), data markets, agent micropayments, governance, and securing AI pipelines (training/federated learning, secure inference). The "Protected Pipeline" (Props) framework combines oracles and trusted computation for secure use of private data. Key challenges are highlighted: The industry must rigorously prove decentralized AI's cost competitiveness and crypto's utility for agent payments. Major research gaps include providing systemic security for autonomous agents and addressing novel threats like unstoppable AI agents. The report concludes by debunking five common misconceptions: blockchain cannot inherently detect AI content, solve algorithmic bias, grant true AI autonomy, ensure AI trustworthiness through mere transparency, or guarantee that decentralization is always cheaper for AI tasks. The field remains in an early, evidence-seeking phase.

marsbit1h ago

IC3 Top Universities Collaborative Analysis: Is AI x Crypto the Real Future or Just a Narrative Bubble?

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Released the "Most Powerful Model," But Most People Can't Use It

In April, Anthropic launched a preview of its "Mythos" model, which was not publicly released due to its exceptional ability to autonomously discover high-risk zero-day vulnerabilities, posing a security threat if misused. It was restricted to a trusted group of security partners under "Project Glasswing." On June 10, Anthropic officially released Fable 5 and Mythos 5. They share the same underlying model but are distributed under different rules. Fable 5 is for general users, while Mythos 5 remains locked for trusted security partners. Benchmarks show Fable 5 leading in software engineering and long-task execution, with significant improvements in generating production-ready code. However, Fable 5 includes a safety classifier that automatically downgrades requests related to cybersecurity, biochemistry, or model distillation to the weaker Opus 4.8 model. This mechanism, while intended for safety, can affect the user experience and has faced criticism for being overly conservative. Pricing is another key point. Fable 5's API costs are double that of Opus 4.8. Furthermore, after a free trial period ending June 23, it will be removed from standard subscription plans, requiring users to purchase additional credits for access. This shift signals a move towards pay-as-you-go pricing for the most advanced capabilities. The strategy highlights a growing divergence in the AI industry: while some players like DeepSeek are drastically cutting prices, Anthropic is increasing them for its top-tier model, using cost as a filter for high-value users. The article suggests the AI market is stratifying, with commoditized capabilities becoming cheaper while premium, cutting-edge models command a significant price premium.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Released the "Most Powerful Model," But Most People Can't Use It

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片