Abstract
The leading crypto market maker Wintermute reveals a significant shift in retail investor behavior: instead of investing simultaneously in both cryptocurrencies and stocks, retail traders are now choosing between them. Historically, crypto and stock flows moved together, but since late 2024, they have exhibited a strong negative correlation.
Key factors driving this change include the structural compression of crypto’s volatility premium relative to stocks, reducing its appeal as a high-risk, high-reward asset. Improved accessibility through fintech platforms has made it easier for capital to move between crypto and equities, while AI-powered tools have enhanced retail traders’ analytical edge in stock markets—an advantage still lacking in crypto due to its unclear valuation frameworks.
As a result, crypto is becoming just one option among many in retail portfolios, rather than the primary speculative arena. Investors are advised to adopt a multi-asset portfolio perspective when analyzing crypto markets, as traditional indicators like M2 money supply have lost predictive power.
Source: Wintermute
Author: Jasper De Maere
Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews
Bitpush Note:
As a leading market maker in the crypto industry, Wintermute handles daily trading volumes amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. Compared to ordinary researchers, they can penetrate the fog and see the most authentic flow of retail funds. In this latest report, Wintermute raises an alarming point for the crypto circle: the "retail faith" that once supported the crypto market is wavering. In the past, cryptocurrencies and stocks typically rose and fell together, but starting from late 2024, this relationship completely reversed—retail investors began making a "choose one" single choice between the two.
Below is the main text:
Retail activity drives the cryptocurrency market. Through speculation, reflexive buying on dips, and agile capital rotation within the token world, retail investors define every major market cycle. However, new data indicates that the relationship between retail investors and cryptocurrencies is changing. For some time, we have observed that the stock market is attracting retail attention at the expense of altcoins. New data from J.P. Morgan's strategy department, combined with our own flow data, now suggests that stocks and cryptocurrencies are increasingly becoming complementary risk assets.
Core Viewpoints
-
Reversal Phenomenon: Retail investment activity in cryptocurrencies and stocks used to move in the same direction. But since late 2024, the two have shown an inverse relationship: when retail buys stocks, they remain quiet in the cryptocurrency market, and vice versa.
-
Volatility Premium Compression: The volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks, which was once their biggest attraction to retail, is now structurally compressing. Volatility is no longer a product feature with diversification characteristics in cryptocurrency investment.
-
Technology-Driven Factors: Some under-discussed technical reasons are accelerating this shift. For example, easier access to cryptocurrencies has dismantled the "closed audience" effect; meanwhile, large language model (LLM)-driven analysis is narrowing the cognitive advantage gap in the stock market, a phenomenon not yet occurring in the cryptocurrency space.
-
Traditional Indicators Fail: Traditional leading indicators for crypto risk appetite (such as M2 money supply) are failing. Investors should increasingly view cryptocurrencies through the lens of a multi-asset portfolio, similar to other mature asset classes.
Reversal Phenomenon
By overlaying Wintermute's proprietary crypto retail flow data with J.P. Morgan's retail stock inflow data, we gain a new perspective on the relationship between retail stock and crypto activity.
Historically, the two have maintained synchronized trends until late 2024. At that time, high risk appetite sentiment drove simultaneous buying in both, as they both served, to some extent, as outlets for excess capital (see M2) and risk appetite.
However, since late 2024, this relationship has broken down: as retail floods into the stock market at an unprecedented pace, they are holding back on cryptocurrencies, and the divergence between the two has now reached historical extremes.
Zooming in, we use altcoin market capitalization as a long-term proxy indicator for retail crypto activity.
It closely aligns with our retail flow data and has an impartial and longer historical record. Between 2022 and late 2024, cryptocurrencies and stocks generally moved in sync, both viewed by the retail sector as a type of high-risk investment portfolio. The decoupling in late 2024 is very noticeable, also indicating that retail activity has become more short-term driven, volatile, and to some extent, lacking in structure.
The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. The once volatile but generally positive relationship has turned negative. Retail is now allocating between the two, rather than injecting funds into both simultaneously.
Focusing on 2025 and overlaying key catalysts makes this dynamic clearer. Several points are noteworthy:
-
Memecoins and AI agents had their moments in the spotlight when stock market activity stalled, as retail found speculative outlets elsewhere.
-
Retail continued to aggressively buy the dip in the stock market, both during the tariff policy announcement in April 2025 and in recent market volatility.
-
After October 10th, the market almost completely shifted towards stocks, and this trend continues currently.
Causality
The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. The once volatile but generally positive relationship has turned negative. Retail is now choosing between the two, rather than investing in both.
This new data also confirms this. Retail activity in the stock market has become a new variable that cryptocurrency investors should closely monitor to identify windows of opportunity where retail funds might more sustainably flow into cryptocurrencies.
Volatility = The Product Itself
One reason retail is attracted to and remains active in cryptocurrency is the asset's volatility characteristics. Volatility is the product. It was the initial force that drew retail into the crypto space.
However, although the actual volatility of cryptocurrencies still far exceeds that of the stock market, a trend of structural contraction has formed, and this trend is difficult to reverse in the short term. The volatility ratio of BTC to the Nasdaq Index (NDX) continues to decline, even compressing to below 2x in the first half of 2025.
Thoughts on key drivers:
-
Market Maturation: With the increasing presence of sophisticated investors and new liquidity tools like ETFs and DATs, the reflexive volatility peaks that defined earlier cycles have been smoothed out.
-
Market Capacity: At a market capitalization of $2.3 trillion (even 40% below the all-time high), the capital flow required to move the market is far greater than five years ago.
As volatility compresses, the core selling point of cryptocurrencies to retail is also eroding. The "excess volatility" that defined the 21-22 cycle and attracted a generation of retail investors is gone. For retail seeking volatility, stocks are becoming increasingly attractive.
Technology-Driven Factors
In addition to crypto-specific market structure, some under-discussed technical factors are also accelerating this shift.
-
Crypto Access: The integration of crypto trading by fintech and traditional brokerage platforms (or the integration of stock trading by crypto-native platforms) has lowered the entry barrier, but the more profound impact is on "exit." In previous cycles, funds were effectively locked into the crypto space due to on-ramp friction, leading to organic rotation between tokens. Now, the same seamless on/off-ramps mean funds can easily flow between crypto and stocks without significant obstacles.
-
Cognitive Iteration: Retail seems increasingly attracted to the stock market, partly due to a new sense of cognitive advantage unlocked through AI. Large language models have significantly enhanced retail's analytical capabilities, creating a sense of a "level playing field."
-
This feeling is missing in the crypto space. Although analysis based on data is possible, cryptocurrencies lack a consensus valuation framework and token value capture mechanism, coupled with an ever-expanding investable universe, making it difficult for retail to gain that sense of cognitive advantage.
Conclusion
Retail investors, once the most reliable source of self-reinforcing demand for the crypto market, are increasingly satisfying their risk appetite elsewhere.
The stock market not only offers increasingly competitive volatility but also provides a growing sense of analytical advantage, and allows seamless switching to stock trading through apps already on retail investors' phones.
Cryptocurrencies still have a place in retail portfolios, but they are now just one of many choices, no longer the main battlefield for speculation.
This shift should also reshape how investors view the market Some proven traditional indicators have already failed. For crypto investors, merely finding leading indicators for risk appetite combined with a crypto-native framework is no longer sufficient to win. Investors need to increasingly examine cryptocurrencies from a cross-asset portfolio perspective, as is standard practice in stocks and fixed income.
Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN
Bitpush TG Discussion:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity
Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush
Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7615177
Related Questions
QAccording to Wintermute, what major shift in retail investor behavior has occurred since late 2024 regarding stocks and cryptocurrencies?
ASince late 2024, the relationship between retail investment activity in stocks and cryptocurrencies has reversed. Instead of moving in the same direction, they now show an inverse relationship: when retail investors buy stocks, they are inactive in the crypto market, and vice versa.
QWhat is one of the key technical factors accelerating the shift of retail attention from crypto to stocks, as mentioned in the report?
AOne key technical factor is the integration of AI and large language models (LLMs), which have significantly enhanced retail investors' analytical capabilities in the stock market, creating a perceived 'level playing field' and a sense of cognitive edge that is currently missing in the cryptocurrency space.
QHow has the volatility premium of cryptocurrencies, a major attraction for retail investors, changed structurally?
AThe volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks is structurally compressing. While crypto's actual volatility is still higher, the ratio (e.g., BTC vs. NDX) has been declining and even compressed to below 2x in early 2025, eroding a core selling point that attracted retail investors in previous cycles.
QWhat does the report suggest about the traditional leading indicators for crypto risk appetite, such as M2 money supply?
AThe report states that traditional leading indicators for crypto risk appetite, like the M2 money supply, are failing. Investors now need to view crypto through a multi-asset portfolio lens, similar to how they approach other mature asset classes, rather than relying on these outdated metrics.
QWhat conclusion does Wintermute draw about the future role of cryptocurrencies in retail investors' portfolios?
AWintermute concludes that while they still have a place, cryptocurrencies are now just one choice among many for retail investors and are no longer the main arena for speculation. Retail risk appetite is increasingly being satisfied elsewhere, particularly in the stock market.
Related Reads
If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?
If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain?
The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative.
History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications.
A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem.
The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.
marsbit28m ago
marsbit28m ago
If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?
**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?**
The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix.
Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible.
This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption.
The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems.
Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.
链捕手35m ago
链捕手35m ago
Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience.
He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless.
The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases.
Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.
marsbit1h ago
marsbit1h ago
ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It
Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds.
Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions.
Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics.
While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.
marsbit1h ago
marsbit1h ago
ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed
ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool
A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist.
Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed.
User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option.
Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade.
Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist.
In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.
Foresight News1h ago
Foresight News1h ago
