The CLARITY Act Enters a Critical Review Today: What You Should Focus On?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-14Última atualização em 2026-05-14

Resumo

The CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act), a landmark bill to establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, enters a crucial committee markup in the U.S. Senate Banking Committee. While it has a significant chance of advancing to a full Senate vote, its path is narrowing with over 130 proposed amendments. Key tensions surround the bill: whether stablecoin rewards constitute unfair competition for bank deposits, if the legislation genuinely protects investors or merely enables industry expansion, and the push from Democrats to include ethics provisions related to the Trump family's crypto dealings. Banking lobbyists strongly oppose the stablecoin reward compromise, and with the summer recess and midterm elections approaching, the window for passage is tightening. Prediction markets currently assign about a 60% probability of the bill becoming law this year.

Editor's Note: On May 14th, at 10:30 AM Eastern Time (10:30 PM Beijing Time) today, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee will conduct a committee review of the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" (known as the CLARITY Act). This is a critical step in the legislative process. If passed, the CLARITY Act will advance to a full Senate vote.

The committee's official website shows that this Executive Session has been scheduled on the agenda. Previously, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, along with Cynthia Lummis and Thom Tillis, released the latest version of the market structure bill text on May 12th. They stated its goal is to provide "clear rules" for digital assets, protect ordinary investors, combat illicit financial activities, and keep financial innovation within the United States.

This article is from Fortune, focusing on the political maneuvers on the eve of the CLARITY Act's review by the Senate Banking Committee. The most noteworthy aspect is not whether the bill is "pro-crypto," but how, as it nears passage, it exposes three key tensions in U.S. crypto regulation: First, whether stablecoin yields are payment incentives or de facto deposit competition; Second, whether the crypto market structure legislation is protecting investors or opening an institutional pathway for industry expansion; Third, given the deep involvement of the Trump family in crypto businesses, whether ethical constraints must be simultaneously incorporated into the market structure reforms.

From the current situation, the CLARITY Act still has a relatively good chance of entering a full Senate vote, but its margin for error is narrowing. Fortune reports that members of the Senate Banking Committee have already submitted over 130 amendments before the review, with Elizabeth Warren alone proposing 44. Meanwhile, the banking industry is concerned that stablecoin reward mechanisms could siphon off bank deposits and has sent a large number of opposition letters to Senate offices.

Although the key Republican swing vote John Kennedy has indicated a tendency to support it, and the chance of the bill entering full Senate consideration remains high, with the summer recess and midterm elections approaching, the window for the CLARITY Act's passage is narrowing. Prediction markets have also lowered its probability of passing this year to about 60%.

Below is the original text:

The CLARITY Act is a landmark bill aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for the U.S. crypto industry. The bill will begin its markup review process in a Senate committee starting Thursday. Its passing prospects have boosted investor sentiment, but there remain several significant hurdles to cross before Congress can send the bill to President Trump's desk.

CLARITY is short for the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act." The bill passed the House of Representatives last year but encountered resistance in the Senate Banking Committee due to disputes between banks and stablecoin companies over whether and when rewards can be paid on stablecoin balances. Now, as senators prepare to propose amendments, Democrats are pushing to include ethical constraint clauses related to the Trump family's crypto businesses.

According to a copy of proposed amendments reviewed by Fortune, members of the Senate Banking Committee have submitted over 130 proposed amendments ahead of Thursday's markup, with Senator Elizabeth Warren alone submitting 44.

Some of the proposed amendments are minor, but others aim to advance the positions of the bill's opponents. These opponents include banking interests concerned that stablecoins could weaken the deposit base of banks, as well as those worried about ethical and national security risks accompanying the crypto industry's expansion.

"I think it will pass, based on the progress made in both chambers of Congress so far and the White House's support for this bill," Steve Yelderman, general counsel for the Ethereum-focused initiative Etherealize, told Fortune. "Having said that, this is Washington, and anything can happen."

Earlier this year, the CLARITY Act came close to entering a Senate Banking Committee markup, but Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill over a proposed ban on stablecoin rewards. Since then, Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Senator Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) reached an agreement on the stablecoin yield issue. However, banking lobbying groups now complain that this compromise is too friendly to stablecoin companies. Reportedly, members of the American Bankers Association have sent over 8,000 letters to Senate offices criticizing this yield compromise.

A Senate aide told Fortune that during tomorrow's markup, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is expected to emphasize protecting "ordinary people," safeguarding national security, and keeping crypto innovation in the United States as the main goals of the CLARITY Act. Another Senate aide said Democrats are expected to focus on the ethical issues raised by President Trump's numerous crypto connections.

"Democrats are increasingly concerned that if ethics provisions are not included in the version of the bill marked up by the Banking Committee, they may not be included later," the staffer said. They added that Democrats are focused on addressing the issue of the Trump family profiting from cryptocurrencies within the market structure legislation. Republicans and Democrats have met several times this week to discuss how to add ethics clauses to the CLARITY Act.

For now, the bill's chances of reaching a full Senate vote remain significant. A key Republican who had previously been hesitant about the CLARITY Act in the Banking Committee, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, told Semafor he plans to support the bill. However, with the summer recess and midterm elections approaching, the margin for error for the CLARITY Act remains quite limited. Traders on Polymarket have become less optimistic about the bill's prospects this week. The prediction market currently puts the probability of the bill passing this year at 60%.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and what is its primary goal?

AThe CLARITY Act refers to the 'Digital Asset Market Clarity Act'. It is a landmark bill aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for the crypto industry in the U.S., with the primary goal of providing clear rules for digital assets while protecting retail investors, combating illicit finance, and keeping financial innovation in the United States.

QWhy was the progression of the CLARITY Act in the Senate Banking Committee previously stalled?

AThe bill's progress in the Senate Banking Committee was previously stalled due to disputes between banks and stablecoin companies over the question of whether and when stablecoin balances could pay rewards.

QWhat are the key tensions in U.S. crypto regulation highlighted by the CLARITY Act's progress?

AThe article highlights three key tensions: 1) Whether stablecoin rewards are a payment incentive or a form of indirect deposit competition; 2) Whether the crypto market structure legislation protects investors or opens a regulatory pathway for industry expansion; 3) Whether market structure reform must incorporate ethical constraints given the deep involvement of the Trump family in crypto businesses.

QWhat is one major concern Democrats are trying to address with proposed amendments to the CLARITY Act?

ADemocrats are trying to address ethical concerns by pushing to incorporate ethical constraint clauses related to the Trump family's crypto business profits into the market structure legislation.

QAccording to prediction markets, what is the current estimated probability of the CLARITY Act passing in 2025?

AAccording to the prediction market Polymarket, the estimated probability of the CLARITY Act passing in 2025 is currently around 60%.

Leituras Relacionadas

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

**Title: Is There Another Wave for Web3 Gaming? A Veteran Player's Review: When Hype Peaks, You Must Exit at Least Half** **Summary:** In an interview, veteran player "Earn Money Chicken" shares his journey and reflections on Web3 gaming. He transitioned from being a traditional in-game trader to a Web3 gamer, having profited from games like Mobox, StepN, and Seraph, but also experiencing significant losses. He defines himself primarily as a player, not an investor, attracted to Web3 games for the blend of earning potential, engaging gameplay, and the satisfaction of researching game mechanics. While he enjoys strategic "gambling" within games, he emphasizes it's not about zero-sum competition with other players. The interview explores the complex, often adversarial relationship between players, projects, and major investors (whales). The player's experience as a traditional game merchant helped develop his analytical mindset for spotting opportunities, but wasn't directly transferable. He identifies the core sources of profit in early Web3 gaming as **"era红利" (era-specific红利)** and strategic foresight, not just simple calculations. He warns that the biggest mistake ordinary players make is calculating their return-on-investment (ROI) period at peak hype, as asset and yield depreciation can trap them. Reflecting on his wins and losses, he now advocates for managing expectations. His most successful exit was from Seraph, where he sold at a relatively good time. The key problem with current Web3 games, he argues, is that most are not mature games first. A successful Web3 game must primarily be a **good, fun game** with a genuine player base willing to spend money for enjoyment, not just participants seeking profit. The blockchain element should solve problems within that context, not be the primary driver. While he believes the sector might see another speculative boom (possibly another strong "Ponzi" model attracting hype), a truly mature and sustainable Web3 game likely needs to come from a traditional major game studio. It would leverage a proven IP, mature content, a functional NFT trading system, and attract both traditional and crypto-native players, offering more normalized returns rather than extreme暴利. His final advice: Newcomers without prior experience should avoid the space now, as it's like searching for a diamond in the rough. For those remaining, the rule is: be brave when assets are low and overlooked, but **when everyone is talking about it (at peak hype), you must sell at least half your holdings.**

marsbitHá 9m

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

marsbitHá 9m

The Most Hidden AI Winners

"The Most Under-the-Radar AI Winners" While core AI giants and their direct suppliers have dominated headlines, a group of seemingly unrelated, decades-old manufacturing companies have emerged as major beneficiaries. A key example is Japan's TOTO, famous for bathroom fixtures. Its stock soared 145% in a year, driven not by its mainstay toilet business but by its nearly 40-year-old semiconductor ceramic component unit. Specifically, TOTO manufactures electrostatic chucks—critical, hard-to-replace parts for advanced chip manufacturing processes like etching and EUV lithography. This segment, though only 9% of revenue, contributed over 54% of operating profit in FY2025 with a 43% margin. High barriers to entry, including deep know-how in high-purity ceramic sintering and long supplier certification cycles (5+ years), secure its position. This pattern repeats across industries. Nitto Boseki, a 128-year-old glass fiber maker, saw its stock rise 325% due to near-monopoly supply of T-glass, an essential low-expansion material for AI chip substrates. Similarly, Ajinomoto, the global MSG leader, commands 80-95% of the market for ABF film, a vital insulating layer in chip packaging. These "hidden" segments, often born from deep materials science expertise, are now bottleneck supplies in the AI hardware chain, enjoying pricing power and high margins. In China's A-share market, the theme combines this AI-driven demand with domestic substitution. Companies like Zhongci Electronic (advancing in electrostatic chucks) and Honghe Technology & Feilihua (in high-end electronic glass fabrics) are gaining traction. The investment thesis hinges on whether these domestic players can rapidly scale qualified capacity to capture the supply gap within the critical time window. Ultimately, these cases show that in the AI supply chain, high-profit concentrations exist not only at the cutting-edge tech frontier but also in indispensable, difficult-to-replicate materials and components. Market recognition often lags behind fundamental profit shifts, creating potential for significant re-ratings as traditional industrial firms are re-evaluated as key enablers of advanced semiconductor manufacturing.

marsbitHá 34m

The Most Hidden AI Winners

marsbitHá 34m

The Most Secretive Winners of the AI Boom

"The Most Hidden AI Winners" An unlikely group of companies are emerging as major beneficiaries of the AI boom, not from designing chips, but from supplying critical materials and components essential for advanced semiconductor manufacturing. These 'hidden winners' are traditional manufacturers whose deep expertise in materials science has become indispensable. Japanese companies are leading this trend. Toto, globally known for bathroom fixtures, has seen its stock surge 145% over the past year, driven by its 40-year-old semiconductor ceramics business, which now contributes over half of its operating profit. Its electrostatic chucks are vital for advanced chip production and require years of expertise to manufacture. Similarly, Nittobo, a 128-year-old textile firm, controls 90% of the market for T-glass, a low-expansion glass fiber essential for AI chip substrates. Ajinomoto, the world's largest MSG producer, dominates the market (80-95% share) for ABF insulating film used in chip packaging. The core insight is that chasing "advanced" chips paradoxically increases reliance on traditional, high-precision material science where supply cannot be quickly replicated. These materials are now critical bottlenecks in the AI supply chain. This trend is mirrored in China's A股 market, framed by the theme of 'import substitution'. Companies like Zhongci Dianzi (electrostatic chucks) and Honghe Technology (ultra-thin electronic cloth) are making progress, but face the test of scaling production and matching Japanese rivals' quality. The key tension lies in the slow change of market perception. While profit structures rapidly shift towards high-margin tech components, these firms retain their traditional industry classifications, creating a valuation gap that is gradually closing as their roles in the AI ecosystem become undeniable.

链捕手Há 41m

The Most Secretive Winners of the AI Boom

链捕手Há 41m

DeFi Enters a Moment of Value Reassessment: Risks and Opportunities Behind the $70 Billion TVL

DeFi Enters a Moment of Value Reassessment: Peril and Opportunity Behind $70 Billion TVL On July 1st, the total value locked (TVL) across all DeFi protocols fell below $70 billion to approximately $69.358 billion, hitting its lowest point since February 2024. This decline signals a significant contraction in DeFi liquidity and marks a new adjustment phase for the industry, far from its 2021 peak of over $180 billion. The primary drivers of this TVL drop are a general decrease in crypto market risk appetite, which leads capital to exit volatile sectors like DeFi first, and the fading effectiveness of the high-yield liquidity incentive models that fueled the initial DeFi boom. Many protocols' high TVL figures were built on temporary subsidy-driven capital rather than genuine demand. Furthermore, capital is migrating to newer narratives like AI, RWA, and modular infrastructure. This cooldown exposes DeFi's growth bottlenecks: innovation has slowed with rampant protocol copycats, real yields have normalized to single digits, and poor user experience continues to hinder mass adoption beyond crypto-natives. However, the TVL decline does not spell the end for DeFi. The metric itself is limited, as it fluctuates with underlying asset prices. The industry is shifting from capital accumulation to efficiency competition, leveraging Layer 2 solutions and modular architecture to do more with less locked value. Crucially, DeFi is expanding into real-world financial use cases like the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) and the growth of the stablecoin ecosystem, moving its value proposition from speculative token subsidies to real cash flows. In conclusion, while short-term pressures from liquidity contraction and user growth stagnation persist, the sector is undergoing a necessary value reassessment. DeFi is transitioning from a subsidy-driven, hype-based era toward a more mature, rational, and efficiency-focused phase, with long-term growth hinging on meeting real-world financial needs through RWA, stablecoins, and robust infrastructure.

marsbitHá 1h

DeFi Enters a Moment of Value Reassessment: Risks and Opportunities Behind the $70 Billion TVL

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片