Tether Shuts Down CNH₮ Stablecoin Due to Low Demand and Market Pressures

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-21Last updated on 2026-02-21

Abstract

Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer, has announced it will discontinue its offshore Chinese yuan-pegged stablecoin, CNH₮, citing low demand and increased regulatory pressures. The company will immediately stop minting new tokens and will support redemptions for one year from the announcement date. Tether stated the token did not attract significant engagement, making it difficult to justify the operational resources required. The company will instead focus its efforts on its dominant USDT stablecoin, prioritizing markets with better growth prospects and higher adoption rates.

The largest stablecoin issuer, Tether, has said that it decided not to support its offshore Chinese Yuan-pegged Stablecoin CNH₮ because of the weaker demand compared with its other stablecoin products and tighter regulatory pressures.

According to the announcement on February 20, Tether said that it will follow a structured, transparent process, which is similar to the prior product shutdown, as it will proceed in two phases.

Firstly, Tether will immediately stop issuing new CNH₮ tokens, and then, no new tokens will be minted. Secondly, the company stated that redemption support for CNH₮ will continue for one year from the announcement date, giving holders time to redeem their tokens. Tether will issue a separate reminder notice ahead of the redemption deadline.

CNH₮ Faces Low Demand and Market Pressures

As Tether wrote, “We continuously evaluate our stablecoin offerings to ensure they align with real-world usage, long-term sustainability, and the needs of the communities that rely on them. Community interest and adoption are central to every product decision we make.”

With that, the explicit reason behind Tether’s decision is that the CNH₮, yuan-pegged stablecoin, did not attract significant engagement, making it difficult to justify the operational, engineering, and compliance resources required to maintain it at Tether’s standards.

Tether Focuses on USDT

Also, Tether said about the evolving market conditions that reduced the token’s long-term viability. In addition, Tether wrote, “Our priority is to allocate resources where they can most effectively enhance security, reliability, and innovation across the digital asset landscape,” which explains that Tether has decided to concentrate on markets with better growth prospects and higher adoption rates.
With that note, Tether will continue to focus on its stablecoin ecosystem, which is USDT. Among several stablecoins, USDT is still the dominant stablecoin with a $183 million market cap and also tops with $80.16 billion in 24-hour trading volume. As the company intends to improve its liquidity, expand its tokenization infrastructure, and support new financial tools aimed at better serving global users and developers.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Bitcoin ETFs See $88M Inflows, Ending Three-Day Outflow Streak

TagsStablecoinTether

Related Questions

QWhy did Tether decide to shut down its CNH₮ stablecoin?

ATether decided to shut down its CNH₮ stablecoin due to low demand compared to its other products and increased regulatory pressures, making it difficult to justify the operational resources required to maintain it.

QWhat is the two-phase process Tether will follow to discontinue CNH₮?

AIn the first phase, Tether will immediately stop minting new CNH₮ tokens. In the second phase, it will continue to support redemptions for one year from the announcement date (February 20).

QWhat is Tether's primary focus after discontinuing the CNH₮ stablecoin?

ATether's primary focus is on its USDT stablecoin ecosystem, aiming to improve liquidity, expand tokenization infrastructure, and support new financial tools for global users and developers.

QWhat was the market capitalization and 24-hour trading volume of USDT mentioned in the article?

AUSDT has a market capitalization of $183 million and a 24-hour trading volume of $80.16 billion, making it the dominant stablecoin.

QHow long will Tether continue to allow redemptions for the CNH₮ token?

ATether will continue to support redemptions for the CNH₮ token for one year from the announcement date (February 20) and will issue a reminder notice before the deadline.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片