# Arbitrum Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Arbitrum", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit04/21 07:59

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit04/21 07:59

Deep Reflections Behind the OP Plunge

In a significant move, Coinbase's Base announced its departure from the Optimism OP Stack to develop its own proprietary unified architecture, causing a sharp 20% drop in $OP’s price. This event highlights the ongoing debate between two competing economic models for blockchain infrastructure: Optimism’s fully open-source, MIT-licensed approach versus Arbitrum’s “community source” model, which mandates a 10% protocol income contribution from chains built on its Orbit stack that settle outside the Arbitrum ecosystem. Optimism’s strategy emphasizes openness and network effects, attracting major projects like Base, Worldcoin, and Uniswap with its modular, permission-free stack. However, this model risks ecosystem fragmentation, as high-value chains may eventually choose independence. In contrast, Arbitrum enforces economic alignment through its revenue-sharing requirement, aiming for long-term sustainability, though it may slow initial adoption. This tension mirrors historical open-source dilemmas, such as those seen with Linux, MySQL, and WordPress, where balancing free access with sustainable funding remains challenging. In crypto, the presence of native tokens amplifies these dynamics, making economic alignment and infrastructure financing even more critical. Neither model is perfect—each involves trade-offs between growth and sustainability. The key takeaway is the need for a broader ecosystem discussion on how to fund and maintain essential public infrastructure without relying on free-riders. Base’s exit should serve as a catalyst for this conversation.

marsbit02/22 09:27

Deep Reflections Behind the OP Plunge

marsbit02/22 09:27

Robinhood Ventures into L2, Focusing on RWA Tokenization

In late January 2026, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev highlighted that the GameStop short squeeze incident five years earlier could have been avoided with blockchain’s real-time settlement capabilities. Shortly after, Robinhood launched the testnet of Robinhood Chain, an Arbitrum-based Layer 2 network focused on tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), including stocks, ETFs, and private assets. Built on Arbitrum Orbit, Robinhood Chain leverages Ethereum for data availability and uses ETH as its native gas token. The platform combines Ethereum’s security with custom compliance features, allowing Robinhood to enforce regulatory rules while maintaining interoperability with existing DeFi infrastructure. Prior to the testnet, Robinhood had already been testing tokenized stocks in Europe for eight months. These assets are structured as derivative contracts pegged to the price of underlying equities—not as direct ownership claims. The system supports features like dividend pass-through and on-chain minting/burning tied to user positions. Robinhood acquired necessary regulatory licenses, including MiCA and MiFID approvals, partly through its acquisition of Bitstamp. The platform aims to enable 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and global accessibility with low fees. However, challenges remain, including legal ambiguity around asset representation, centralization risks (with Robinhood Europe as the sole counterparty), and potential pushback from traditional institutions. Robinhood Chain represents a significant step in blurring the lines between traditional finance and crypto, though its balance between compliance and decentralization remains a key point of observation.

marsbit02/12 08:34

Robinhood Ventures into L2, Focusing on RWA Tokenization

marsbit02/12 08:34

活动图片