SEC Crypto Task Force Receives New Submissions on Self-Custody and DeFi Rules

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-21Última atualização em 2026-01-21

Resumo

The U.S. SEC Crypto Task Force has received two new public submissions addressing key regulatory issues in digital assets, including self-custody rights and DeFi oversight. One submission, referencing Louisiana’s HB 488 law, advocates for federal crypto market regulations that include registration requirements, transparency, and anti-fraud measures, while cautioning against overly broad exemptions. Another, from the Blockchain Association, requests SEC guidance on whether entities involved in tokenized equity and DeFi trading should be classified as dealers under the Securities Exchange Act, suggesting adaptations to traditional broker-dealer frameworks for smart contract-based trading. These inputs come amid ongoing congressional negotiations on the CLARITY Act, which seeks to clarify digital asset regulations, with industry stakeholders actively engaging in the debate around investor protection and innovation.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Crypto Task Force has received two new written submissions to its public input page, which have once again highlighted important issues in digital asset regulation, such as self-custody rights and the regulatory status of decentralised finance (DeFi).

One of the proposals, from a Louisiana resident named DK Willard, references the Louisiana HB 488 law, which protects the state’s residents’ right to control their own digital assets. The proposal states that the upcoming federal law on the structure of the crypto market should contain proper registration requirements, transparency, and robust anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions. The proposal warns that too wide-reaching exemptions at the federal level could permit developers or platforms to circumvent investor protections.

The second observation is from the Blockchain Association Trading Firm Working Group, which urges the SEC to issue guidance on whether firms engaging in tokenized equity and DeFi trading on their own behalf should or should not be considered dealers subject to registration under the Securities Exchange Act. The comment suggests that the conventional broker-dealer framework applicable in traditional markets may need to be adapted to accommodate smart contract settlement and trading without necessarily requiring dealer registration.

These comments were posted on the SEC’s “Written Input” page for the Crypto Task Force, which is intended to allow stakeholders to share their views that may help shape the federal approach to digital assets.

Context Within Ongoing Regulatory Debate

The timing of these new filings is as Congress is in the middle of negotiations on the federal crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, which aims to provide clarity on the regulatory framework and update investor protection regulations for digital assets. There have been debates among industry participants and regulators on matters such as stablecoin regulation, DeFi liquidity, and innovation vs. regulation.

A senior crypto advisor to the White House, Patrick Witt, has urged a compromise in order to move the CLARITY Act in a period of time in which the Republican Party controls both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and in which the Trump administration is still in power. Industry leaders, such as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, have been part of the process.

The recent filings with the SEC Crypto Task Force indicate the ongoing interest of the industry in federal regulation of digital assets, in particular with respect to self-custody rights and the nature of DeFi trading activity. As federal legislative development progresses and various parties make their voices heard, these perspectives may inform how regulatory frameworks balance investor protection and innovation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Galaxy Digital Bets on Balanced Strategy With New $100M Crypto-Linked Hedge Fund

TagsDeFiSEC

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two main issues highlighted in the new submissions to the SEC Crypto Task Force?

AThe two main issues highlighted are self-custody rights and the regulatory status of decentralized finance (DeFi).

QWhich state law was referenced in the proposal from DK Willard, and what right does it protect?

AThe proposal referenced Louisiana HB 488 law, which protects the state's residents' right to control their own digital assets.

QWhat does the Blockchain Association Trading Firm Working Group urge the SEC to provide guidance on?

AIt urges the SEC to issue guidance on whether firms engaging in tokenized equity and DeFi trading on their own behalf should be considered dealers subject to registration under the Securities Exchange Act.

QWhat is the name of the federal crypto market structure bill currently being negotiated in Congress?

AThe federal crypto market structure bill is called the CLARITY Act.

QAccording to the article, what is the White House senior crypto advisor Patrick Witt urging to help move the CLARITY Act forward?

APatrick Witt is urging a compromise to move the CLARITY Act forward during a period of Republican control of both the House and Senate and while the Trump administration is still in power.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight NewsHá 36m

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight NewsHá 36m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHá 55m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHá 55m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbitHá 1h

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片