Putting Markets On-Chain: Canton Network Quietly Becoming the New Backbone for Institutional Finance

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

Canton Network: A New Institutional Financial Infrastructure Emerges Visa's rapid three-day approval as a super-validator on Canton Network in March 2026 marks a significant institutional endorsement. Unlike public blockchains like Ethereum, which prioritize transparency, Canton is designed for regulated financial institutions. Its core innovation is built-in data visibility control, where transaction details are only visible to direct participants. This enables institutions like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and DTCC to conduct private, secure business on-chain without exposing sensitive strategies or positions. Canton, developed by Wall Street-focused Digital Asset, emphasizes slow, methodical development to meet stringent institutional requirements. Current on-chain activity, exceeding $9 trillion monthly, involves real balance-sheet operations like tokenized repos, treasury settlements, and collateral movement—not retail speculation. Key applications include JPMorgan's deposit token (JPM Coin), DTCC's U.S. Treasury tokenization, and Visa-enabled atomic settlement, aiming to synchronize asset delivery and payment instantly. The network's CC token is a utility asset, with value tied to real financial activity volume. It features no pre-mine or VC allocations, aligning with institutional preferences for transparency. Canton's 3–5 year vision is to become an "invisible" foundational layer for global finance—facilitating real-time cross-border capital flows, institutional stable...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | jk

I. A Proposal Approved in Three Days

On March 20, 2026, Visa, a globally renowned payment service provider and the logo represented on most bank cards, submitted a governance proposal to Canton Network. According to The Block's report, just three days later, the proposal was approved, and Visa officially became a Canton super validator with the highest weight of Level 10 (Super Validator Weight 10). This was also the first time Visa had ever submitted a blockchain governance proposal.

Within the crypto space, this event might seem like another foray by traditional finance. But if you understand the internal legal and compliance processes of traditional institutions like Visa well enough, you'll realize that approval within three days is rather unusual. Visa's compliance team must have submitted this document with the caution and seriousness of the traditional financial world, and the fact that it received the highest weight indicates that negotiations and due diligence had already been fully completed beforehand. The public saw this proposal, which should be the result of months of collaboration between traditional finance and the crypto world.

In a statement, Rubail Birwadker, Visa's Head of Global Growth Products and Strategic Partnerships, said: "Many banks believe the lack of privacy is the biggest obstacle to moving meaningful business on-chain. By serving as a Canton Network super validator, we bring Visa-level trust, governance, and operational standards to this privacy-preserving blockchain infrastructure, enabling regulated financial institutions to move payments on-chain without upending their existing operating models."

It can be seen that Visa's entry is an endorsement of an already operational, mature institutional network, not a starting point.

Since 2017, in every market cycle, a batch of traditional financial institutions has loudly announced "exploring blockchain," but very few eventually translate into real business. This time, Visa chose to enter the governance layer of the blockchain, holding voting rights and participating in infrastructure decisions. In a statement, Eric Saraniecki, Head of Network Strategy at Digital Asset, a co-founder of Canton Network, said: "Visa's participation confirms that this technology has moved from the experimental stage to being production-ready."

Driven by curiosity about this cooperation, Odaily Planet Daily interviewed the Canton Network team. What exactly facilitated this collaboration? And what made Canton, a long-quiet project, the chosen one?

II. Not More Assets On-Chain, But Putting the Market Itself On-Chain

To understand why Canton can attract Visa, we need to first look at the core differences between Canton and other chains.

The problems Ethereum and Solana solve are: how to get more people involved, how to get more assets on-chain. The problem Canton solves is: how can financial institutions conduct business normally on-chain. They sound like different focuses, but when it comes to specific design, the trade-offs become almost opposite everywhere.

Ethereum's global transparency is an advantage for retail investors but an obstacle for institutions. Take a concrete example: if every buy/sell operation of dollars and euros by a bank's foreign exchange trading desk is visible in real-time, counterparties could immediately adjust their quotes based on this information, significantly increasing the bank's transaction costs. If a market maker's positions and hedging operations were fully public, competitors could simply trade against them, squeezing out profit margins. Repurchase agreements between institutions involve both parties' funding positions and collateral scale; once this data leaks, it poses risks to the entire institution's liquidity management. These limitations are not directly related to regulation; they are dictated by basic business logic.

Even if addresses are not linked to real-name institutions, transparent on-chain trading would change the entire logic of the secondary market. No traditional financial institution wants its trades to be front-run, so designs like Ethereum and Hyperliquid are not optimal choices for large institutions.

Canton's approach is to incorporate data visibility control into the design.

This treatment method builds selective disclosure of data into the protocol layer as a native L1 design, rather than relying on upper-layer applications to patch it. Specifically, only the direct participants in a transaction can see its details; the network completes validation without exposing any sensitive data. Two banks can perform cross-border settlement on the same shared infrastructure, with the transaction completely invisible to all unrelated parties. Competitors can interact on the same network without exposing their respective positions or strategies.

We also inquired about the relevant technical details. Canton's exact words were: "Canton separates the coordination layer (shared across the network) from data visibility (limited to participants), achieved through isolated execution environments and selective synchronization. This allows institutions to trade securely, and competitors to interact, without exposing their respective holdings or strategies. This is the mechanism that enables the real market, not just assets, to operate natively on-chain."

Canton Network told us that the summary of this design logic is: data visibility control is foundational, not an add-on feature.

Therefore, why does Canton's validator list look like an old-money gathering: Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Bank of America, DTCC, Nasdaq, Broadridge, Tradeweb... These institutions are joining because this infrastructure allows them to replicate their traditional financial success on it, which is why liquidity will gradually flow in.

Canton's Super Validator List

III. Wall Street Pedigree, Slow and Steady Work

Canton's creator is Digital Asset Holdings, founded in 2014 by Blythe Masters. Blythe Masters was a star executive at JPMorgan Chase, one of the key pioneers in the CDS field, with deep connections and industry backing on Wall Street. From day one, this company was not making blockchain products for retail; its target customers were those financial institutions with real balance sheets, under strict regulation, needing to operate within legal frameworks.

Regarding its origins, we asked a pointed question: We saw Canton launch in 2023, why did it only fully go live this year?

Canton's answer is, slow and steady work yields fine results.

The Wall Street pedigree determined the entire project's pace. Canton admitted in the interview that this chain took longer than other L1s to reach today because from the start, it was dealing with regulated financial systems, building institutional trust, and how to truly connect to markets with actual business.

This rhythm is completely opposite to the mainstream Web3 narrative. Most public chains pursue rapid launch, rapid ecosystem expansion, rapid hype generation, TGE rollout, and then "the team isn't really sure either." Canton's path is step-by-step negotiation: first secure DTCC, then Goldman Sachs, then JPMorgan Chase, then Visa, introducing real business through their endorsement.

2026 is a turning point, not because of project promotion itself, nor because the crypto world's bear market is starting to shake out, but because above the narrative, the infrastructure has truly met institutional requirements for the first time: real balance sheet activities are operating on it. This is also why now is the best time to pay attention to Canton Network.

"So how much business has been introduced?" we continued to ask.

IV. Canton's On-Chain Activity

Canton's current data is an outlier in the entire blockchain industry, and the nature behind these numbers is very different from most public chains. Currently, Canton Network's monthly processing volume exceeds $9 trillion, with daily transactions reaching hundreds of thousands. The number of ecosystem participants has grown by orders of magnitude over the past three years. These numbers correspond to traditional financial business: tokenized repos, treasury bond settlement, cross-institution collateral mobilization. These are not wash trading but real operations on institutional balance sheets.

We also asked which products are currently mainstream on-chain. Currently, there seem to be several flagship products:

JPMorgan's JPM Coin: In January 2026, JPMorgan's Kinexys division announced the native deployment of JPM Coin to Canton Network. JPM Coin differs in nature from USDT and USDC; it is a deposit token, representing a direct claim on JPMorgan deposits, operating under existing banking regulatory frameworks. For example, two institutions settling a cross-border transaction with JPM Coin on Canton is not fundamentally different from what they do in the traditional system, just much faster settlement and operations no longer limited to business hours. Kinexys currently handles a daily transaction volume between $2-3 billion, with a cumulative total exceeding $1.5 trillion since 2019. This capital flow is about to operate on Canton.

DTCC's U.S. Treasury Tokenization: In December 2025, the U.S. securities depository DTCC announced a partnership with Digital Asset to tokenize a portion of its custodied U.S. Treasuries on Canton, aiming to launch the first version in a controlled production environment in the first half of 2026, then expand based on market demand. DTCC also jointly serves as co-chair of the Canton Foundation with Euroclear, directly participating in network governance.

DTCC processes securities transactions worth over $2 quadrillion annually and is the core of the entire U.S. capital market clearing and settlement system. To use a more intuitive analogy, DTCC's position in traditional finance is somewhat like the People's Bank of China; no one deposits money there, but everyone's stock and bond trades must pass through its backend. The traditional repo market can only operate on business days, stalling after Friday afternoon until Monday. But on Canton, repo transactions can run 24/7, using on-chain U.S. Treasuries as collateral, achieving real-time cross-institution, cross-timezone, weekend-capable funding.

So what will Visa do on Canton?

A core goal described by Canton in the interview is atomic settlement: The buyer's payment and the seller's delivery of assets are completed simultaneously in a single operation, without needing two separate steps or relying on intermediaries to bridge them. For example, currently when an institution buys a batch of bonds, the asset transfer and cash settlement are often two separate processes with a time gap, counterparty risk, and manual reconciliation costs. What Canton aims to achieve is these two things happening at the same time, locked and settled instantly with no time gap. To achieve this goal, capital market infrastructure and payment infrastructure must both be on-chain. Canton has a fairly solid layout on the capital market side; Visa's addition provides a true institutional anchor point on the payments side.

Beyond this, it includes real-time cross-border capital flows, embedding programmable logic into financial transactions, and other blockchain strengths.

Canton believes 2026 is the cycle where infrastructure has truly met institutional requirements for the first time, which is why institutions like Visa are choosing to engage with blockchain infrastructure now.

Other Use Cases Already Running

Tokenized repo is currently the most mature scenario. Repurchase agreements (Repo) are the most common short-term financing tool among financial institutions, simply put, Institution A sells bonds to Institution B for cash while agreeing to buy them back a few days later. Traditionally, this process could only be completed during business hours, and fund settlement had delays. Tokenized repos on Canton have already achieved 24/7 availability and instant settlement; several leading institutions have completed real cross-institution, weekend-covering repo transactions on Canton.

Collateral mobilization is another scenario with real demand. Large financial institutions often need to move collateral from one account or institution to another, e.g., moving bonds held at A to B to meet margin requirements for a derivatives trade. Traditionally, this process took days, during which assets were locked and unavailable for other uses. Canton's settlement model allows this process to be completed nearly in real-time.

Digital bond issuance is another area where Canton has an advantage. Canton mentioned in the interview that it currently holds over half the market share in global digital bond issuance. The reason is Canton can provide complete Delivery versus Payment (DvP), full lifecycle bond management, and multi-party coordination. Bonds can have a complete closed loop from issuance to settlement on-chain, rather than just tokenizing the asset and then relying on off-chain processes to finalize.

Stablecoin settlement is a direction accelerating after Visa's addition, aiming to enable stablecoin payments between institutions to be completed on the same set of compliant infrastructure with data visibility control, rather than detouring through public chains.

Simply put, it's not mentioning RWA, but every sentence is about RWA's needs.

Canton also gave a rough judgment on the upcoming roadmap in the interview: In the medium term, corporate bonds, private credit, and trade finance will follow; longer term, equities are also on this path. From existing use cases to this roadmap, the logic is consistent: the more liquid and the more mature the regulatory framework for an asset class, the sooner it moves.

V. What Does the CC Token Represent?

For broader market participants, what the CC token actually is remains an unavoidable question.

Canton's characterization in the interview is quite direct: CC is a "network utility asset," its value anchored to the volume of real financial activity occurring on the network.

Meaning, demand comes from actual usage; the greater the transaction volume of institutions on Canton, the more CC the network consumes. Long-term drivers for the token include institutional transaction flow, stablecoin settlement volume, on-chain asset totals, and the depth of interoperability between Canton and other networks.

CC has a rather rare setting in token distribution within the Web3 circle: zero pre-mine, zero team allocation, zero VC allocation. All tokens enter the market through fair means. For institutional participants, this setting reduces concerns about "someone holding ultra-low-cost chips, ready to cash out and flee the secondary market at any time." The rules are transparent and equal for all participants.

For ordinary market participants, Canton exists more as backend infrastructure. The way ordinary people will interact with it is more likely through exchanges, wallets, or financial platforms, not directly with the protocol. The improvements it brings, such as faster settlement speeds, tighter bid-ask spreads, and better financial product terms due to lower operational costs, will gradually reach end-users through the product layer, rather than being presented in a way users can directly perceive.

VI. Next Steps

Canton's 3-to-5-year goals provided in the interview are not measured by on-chain TVL or token price. Looking at the specific goals Canton listed: stablecoins becoming the standard means for inter-institutional settlement, just as SWIFT wire transfers are the standard now; major financial institutions, like banks, being able to directly operate loans, deposits, bond issuance, and product packaging on-chain; cross-border capital no longer needing to endure settlement cycles of several days in the traditional system but moving at near-real-time speeds; multiple asset classes completing native issuance and settlement on Canton, rather than being issued off-chain first and then manually syncing information on-chain.

Canton uses "invisible" to describe itself in this state: By then, Canton would just be one of the underlying protocols quietly powering global finance, like TCP/IP for the internet today or SWIFT for cross-border remittances. Users wouldn't perceive its existence, but nothing would work without it.

Of course, this road is still long. Regulation is highly fragmented across jurisdictions; compliance methods in Europe are completely different from Asia; integrating with existing legacy systems is very difficult; banks' core systems used for decades cannot migrate overnight; interoperability between different blockchain networks remains an unresolved technical issue; coordinating institutions on the same infrastructure involves complex interest games. The Canton team did not avoid these in the interview, telling us: The technical bottleneck is no longer the biggest problem; how to truly roll it out globally is.

It can be seen that the transformation of financial infrastructure never happens suddenly on a single day. SWIFT was established in 1973 and took nearly two decades to become the true standard for cross-border settlement. People using it today don't think about how it came to be. The position Canton is in now is probably that "no one realizes yet what it will become" stage. But for something that truly wants to become infrastructure, being forgotten might be what success should look like.

Related Questions

QWhat is the key feature of Canton Network that makes it appealing to traditional financial institutions like Visa, according to the article?

AThe key feature is its native design for data visibility control. It separates coordination (shared network-wide) from data visibility (restricted to transaction participants), allowing institutions to transact securely and privately without exposing sensitive business details like trading positions or strategies to competitors. This enables institutions to conduct normal business on-chain, unlike public chains like Ethereum which are globally transparent.

QWhat milestone regarding Visa's involvement with blockchain does the article highlight?

AThe article highlights that Visa submitted a governance proposal to Canton Network, which was approved in just three days, making Visa a super validator on the network with the highest weight (Super Validator Weight 10). This marks the first time Visa has ever submitted a blockchain governance proposal.

QHow does the article describe the nature and purpose of the CC token in the Canton Network?

AThe article describes CC as a "network utility asset" whose value is tied to the volume of real financial activity on the network. Its demand comes from actual usage. It has a unique allocation model with zero pre-mine, zero team allocation, and zero VC allocation, with all tokens entering the market fairly.

QWhat are some of the primary real-world use cases for Canton Network mentioned in the article?

APrimary use cases include: tokenized repurchase agreements (Repo), enabling 24/7 operations; collateral mobilization between institutions; digital bond issuance, where Canton holds over half the global market share for native digital bond issuance; and atomic settlement, where payment and asset delivery occur simultaneously in a single operation.

QWhat long-term goal does the Canton team have for the network, as stated in the article?

AThe long-term goal is for Canton to become an "invisible" foundational infrastructure for global finance. Similar to how TCP/IP underpins the internet or SWIFT underlies cross-border payments, it would be a protocol that powers financial operations seamlessly in the background, with end-users not directly perceiving it but relying on its benefits like faster settlement and improved financial products.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit19m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit19m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片