PANews Crypto Year-End Review: Did Your 2025 Airdrop Harvesting Score Pass?

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

PANews Year-End Crypto Review: Was Your 2025 Airdrop Farming Performance Up to Standard? Looking back at 2025, more and more participants have had to admit that the returns from airdrop farming this year were far from ideal. While there was no shortage of projects and participation remained high, very few stood out as clear successes—shrinking airdrops, token launches hitting peak prices immediately, and insufficient liquidity support have become the norm. What was once considered a low-risk "consensus dividend" has now turned into a highly competitive screening mechanism. As the easy gains fade, the underlying issues have become clearer: Should participants continue engaging indiscriminately, or is it time to reassess their investment of time, risk exposure, and expected returns?

Looking back at 2025, more and more participants have to admit: the returns from airdrop harvesting this year were far from ideal. There was no shortage of projects, and participation rates remained high, but truly successful ones were few and far between—shrinking airdrops, tokens peaking at launch, and insufficient liquidity support have increasingly become the norm.

Once considered a low-risk "consensus dividend," airdrop harvesting now resembles a highly competitive filtering mechanism. As the红利 (dividends) fade, the underlying issues become clearer:

Should one continue participating indiscriminately, or reassess their time, risk, and expectations?

#PANewsCryptoYearEndReview

Related Questions

QWhat is the main topic of the PANews year-end review article?

AThe article is a year-end review focusing on the disappointing returns and increasing challenges of 'Airdrop Hunting' (撸毛) in the cryptocurrency space for the year 2025.

QAccording to the article, what was the general trend for airdrop rewards in 2025?

AThe trend was that airdrop rewards continued to shrink, with tokens often hitting their peak price at launch and a general lack of liquidity to support them, making returns largely unsatisfactory.

QHow does the article describe the current state of 'Airdrop Hunting'?

AIt describes it as a highly competitive and selective mechanism that is no longer a low-risk 'consensus dividend,' but rather an activity where the红利 (hongli, meaning dividend/bonus) has faded, forcing participants to re-evaluate their strategy.

QWhat key question does the article pose to its readers about their participation?

AIt asks readers to consider whether they should continue participating indiscriminately or if they should re-examine their investment of time, the risks involved, and their expected returns.

QWhat specific cryptocurrency event or practice is being critiqued in this article?

AThe article is critiquing the practice of 'Airdrop Hunting' or '撸毛 (lū máo)', which refers to the strategy of participating in numerous crypto project airdrops in hopes of earning valuable token rewards.

Related Reads

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

MoneyGram, a global leader in cross-border remittances for over 80 years, has launched its own stablecoin, MGUSD. The initiative aims to evolve from single-transaction services to becoming a more integral part of users' financial lives. By allowing customers to hold a stable US dollar balance within the MoneyGram app, MGUSD enables not only remittances but also everyday spending, currency exchange, cash access, and future financial services. Targeting the billions globally who face challenges like currency volatility or lack of bank accounts, MGUSD leverages Stellar blockchain technology with a self-custody wallet architecture. This gives users control over their assets while providing a secure, compliant experience through a trusted brand. The approach focuses on solving existing customer pain points within MoneyGram's established network, rather than competing for broad crypto market liquidity. A key advantage is MoneyGram's hybrid model, combining digital services with the world's largest physical network for crypto-to-cash conversions. The stablecoin also modernizes the company's internal infrastructure, streamlining treasury management and partner settlements, with annual forex volume via stablecoins already reaching $2 billion. The project was delivered in about a year, driven by a reorganization into agile, cross-functional teams that operate with startup-like speed while leveraging decades of institutional expertise. Partners include Stablecoin (issuance), Crossmint (wallet APIs), Fireblocks (enterprise treasury), m0 (smart contracts), and the Stellar network. MoneyGram emphasizes that enhancing direct consumer offerings strengthens its partner ecosystem. The future direction is clear: to provide users worldwide with stable value storage, better financial tools, and greater control over their funds through a trusted, existing network.

Foresight News36m ago

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

Foresight News36m ago

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Bitcoin is approaching a critical block height of 961,632, which could activate the controversial BIP-110 proposal. This proposal aims to restrict the amount of non-financial data, such as inscriptions and other large data payloads, within Bitcoin transactions. Supporters, including some node operators and Bitcoin purists, argue that BIP-110 is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a monetary settlement layer by reducing network congestion and node operational burdens caused by non-essential data. They frame it as a correction to keep the network true to its original purpose. However, critics, including prominent figures like Blockstream's Adam Back and developer Jameson Lopp, warn that the proposal's implementation mechanism is dangerously flawed. They highlight that its low 55% miner signaling threshold, coupled with a contentious enforcement mechanism allowing nodes to unilaterally reject non-compliant blocks, significantly increases the risk of a chain split. Opponents argue this sets a dangerous precedent for transaction censorship, undermines Bitcoin's protocol neutrality, and creates excessive uncertainty for developers and businesses, especially since the rule is proposed as a temporary one-year measure. Market analysts, such as those from Bitfinex, suggest a full-scale network split is unlikely due to a lack of broad economic consensus. Major mining pools remain neutral, and adoption of the new rules is minimal. They view the situation more as a governance stress test. The primary risk is operational disruption: if a minority chain persists, major exchanges and custodians may need to temporarily suspend Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals to manage security and liquidity, potentially unsettling newer institutional investors. While BIP-110 is not expected to succeed in overtaking the main chain, its approach has ignited a significant debate about Bitcoin's governance, core values, and resilience.

Foresight News1h ago

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Foresight News1h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit2h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片