Official Trump: Should traders sell before TRUMP drops to $2.36?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

The memecoin sector posted overall gains of 0.93%, reaching a market cap of $29.93 billion. While some memecoins like PIPPIN and PENGU saw short-term gains, Official Trump (TRUMP) declined 4.23% in 24 hours and has been one of the weakest performers, down 15.8% over the past week and 39.6% year-to-date. The token has been in a sustained downtrend, failing to reclaim key resistance levels. Technical analysis suggests further downside, with potential price targets at $2.368 and $1.312. Although a short-term bounce may occur due to bullish divergence, it is likely an opportunity to sell rather than a trend reversal. The overall outlook for TRUMP remains bearish.

The memecoin sector posted overall gains, rising 0.93% to reach a total market cap of $29.93 billion.

At press time, the best-performing popular memes in the short-term were Pippin [PIPPIN] and Pudgy Penguins [PENGU], gaining 14.2% and 4.6%, respectively, in 24 hours.

Dogecoin [DOGE] was only up 0.59% for the day, by contrast, and Official Trump [TRUMP] was down by 4.23%. TRUMP has been one of the weakest memes over the past week, sliding 15.8% and operating within a longer-term downtrend.

In 2026, Official Trump has recorded a 39.6% drawdown. The bearish long-term trend meant that more losses were likely.

Plotting the next TRUMP price target

The first two weeks of the year saw a sizeable bounce across the crypto market, and Official Trump token prices also surged briefly above $5.5. Towards the end of January, the price fell below the previous swing low at $4.68 (orange).

This marked a continuation of the downtrend. Since then, the bears have remained in control, driving prices lower relentlessly. In early February, a big imbalance (white box) was left around $3.6-$4.1

Over the past month, TRUMP prices visited this area multiple times, but were unable to climb meaningfully into it. This highlighted the $4 zone as a powerful supply zone. At the time of writing, the price was below the psychological round number support at $3.

The Fibonacci extension levels showed that the next price targets were $2.368 and $1.312.

Should traders sell the bounce?

The 4-hour chart showed a bullish divergence between the price and the momentum. It was a sign that a price bounce was likely, but it would not be enough to reverse the downtrend. Instead, traders can use the price bounce to sell.

The Fibonacci retracement levels showed that the bounce could reach $3.01-$3.05. Traders can watch out for a bearish reaction from $2.95-3.05 before selling the memecoin.

Final Summary

The memecoin sector saw some bullishness in the past 24 hours, but it was too little momentum to reverse the longer-term downtrend.
TRUMP was one of the weaker-performing memes, and its downtrend looks likely to continue.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

This article explores how the AI Agent paradigm is fundamentally transforming Web3 gaming, moving from a disruptive force to a core, legitimized element. It begins with the controversy in the competitive baking game Rugpull Bakery, where automated scripts caused fairness issues. Instead of banning them, the developers integrated AI Agents into the official gameplay by providing technical documentation (skill.md, agent.json), marking a shift towards "Agentic Gaming." The piece outlines three primary implementation models for AI Agents in Web3 games by 2026: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** AI Agents act as independent players with unique strategies. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, and Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data. The Somnia blockchain is highlighted as a dedicated "Agentic L1" infrastructure supporting this model at scale. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** This model, exemplified by EVE Frontier, allows AI Agents to program game world logic itself. Using "Smart Assemblies" (e.g., Smart Turrets, Smart Gates), Agents can modify shared economic and physical rules on-chain, creating dynamic, player/AI-built worlds. The ERC-8183 standard further enables these automated entities to hire other AI services for complex tasks. 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptation:** Here, AI serves as a collaborative partner. In Parallel Colony, highly autonomous AI Avatars work alongside human players who provide high-level guidance. Illuvium plans to use AI to make NPCs dynamic and responsive, creating personalized, emergent narratives for each player. The conclusion posits that Web3 gaming has reached a "post-human" inflection point. Blockchains' transparency and programmability, combined with new standards and infrastructure like Somnia, make integrating and governing AI Agents not just viable but essential. The future lies in a symbiotic digital order where players transition from manual laborers to commanders and partners of algorithmic intelligence.

marsbit17m ago

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

marsbit17m ago

Saylor Bought 1,550 BTC, But This Might Be Strategy's Worst Trade Recently

Saylor purchased 1,550 BTC, but this may be one of MicroStrategy's worst recent trades for its MSTR shareholders. The article explains that for MSTR to increase its Bitcoin-per-share (BPS) metric, it must issue new shares at an mNAV (market cap to net asset value) ratio above a "breakeven" level, calculated here as 1.30. In this transaction, MSTR raised $181 million via an ATM offering and used only $101.3 million to buy Bitcoin, with the rest reportedly added to its dollar reserves. Crucially, the author argues the shares were likely sold below the 1.30 mNAV threshold. This combination—selling below breakeven mNAV and not deploying all proceeds into Bitcoin—resulted in a slight dilution of BPS, estimated at a 0.19% decrease. The trade is framed as a sacrifice of MSTR shareholder value (BPS) to extend the dollar reserve runway for its Sustainable Treasury Reserve Coin (STRC) subsidiary from 6.3 to 7 months. The author concludes that Strategy is gambling that this move will improve market sentiment for STRC and MSTR, allowing future value-accretive fundraising. If it fails, the company may face the difficult choice of further diluting MSTR or delaying STRC dividends.

marsbit21m ago

Saylor Bought 1,550 BTC, But This Might Be Strategy's Worst Trade Recently

marsbit21m ago

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

**Title: Saylor's Purchase of 1,550 Bitcoins Was a Bad Trade** The article critically analyzes Strategy's recent move of selling 32 bitcoins followed by a much larger purchase of 1,550 bitcoins. While appearing bullish, the author argues this trade is detrimental to MSTR shareholders. The core argument revolves around the concept of "breakeven modified Net Asset Value (mNAV)," a key metric for Strategy. To increase Bitcoin per share (BPS) for MSTR holders, Strategy must issue new shares at a premium high enough that the funds raised can buy more bitcoin than the bitcoin backing each existing share. Currently, this breakeven mNAV is estimated at 1.30. The recent trade failed on two counts: 1. The shares for the $181 million raise were issued at an mNAV *below* the 1.30 breakeven point. Selling "cheap" shares to buy bitcoin actually *reduces* BPS. 2. Only $101.3 million of the raised funds were used to buy bitcoin; the rest went to boost the company's dollar reserves. The breakeven mNAV calculation assumes *100%* of proceeds are used for bitcoin purchases. Diverting funds, even if mNAV were high, dilutes BPS. The result is an estimated 0.19% decrease in Bitcoin per share for MSTR holders. In exchange, Strategy merely extended its operational runway for its dollar reserves from ~6.3 months to 7 months. The author interprets this as Strategy prioritizing the survival and development of its STRC business over its stated core goal of increasing MSTR's BPS. This constitutes a gamble: if sacrificing MSTR value leads to improved market sentiment and a recovery in STRC's price (and thus mNAV), the whole system could work. If not, Strategy may be forced into a cycle of further diluting MSTR to stay afloat, potentially leading to deferred STRC dividends or corporate decline. The article concludes with a hope for price recovery for Bitcoin, MSTR, and STRC.

Foresight News28m ago

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

Foresight News28m ago

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

After a severe two-day selloff in early June that erased over $1 trillion from U.S. chip stock market value, capital is flowing back first to the memory sector. The correction was not driven by a collapse in AI demand but rather a market reassessment of high expectations. Stocks like Broadcom faced selling pressure despite strong AI revenue guidance, signaling a shift in focus from who has an "AI story" to who can most rapidly translate AI demand into verifiable profits and earnings per share (EPS). Memory companies, such as Micron and SK Hynix, are leading the recovery because their EPS growth is more immediately verifiable. The AI server boom directly increases demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and high-capacity server DRAM, tightening supply and driving up contract prices for conventional DRAM and NAND Flash. This price increase, coupled with a shift to higher-margin products, flows directly into near-term revenue and profitability, as evidenced in recent earnings reports. In contrast, other AI semiconductor segments like GPUs, ASICs, and optical modules, while central to the long-term AI infrastructure story, face longer and less certain paths to EPS validation. Their growth depends more on future product cycles, customer adoption timelines, and capital expenditure plans. The rebound in memory stocks highlights a market preference for assets with shorter, more transparent EPS conversion cycles following the recent de-risking phase. However, this does not negate the potential of other AI hardware segments should they provide clearer near-term order visibility. The episode has raised the validation bar for all AI-related investments.

marsbit28m ago

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

marsbit28m ago

Google's $85 Billion Secondary Offering Breaks Historical Record, Buffett Invests $10 Billion in AI Infrastructure

Alphabet (Google) has completed a record-breaking $847.5 billion equity offering, the largest in history. The funds are earmarked for AI infrastructure, with Alphabet's 2026 capital expenditure guidance raised to $180-190 billion. The complex financing structure included public offerings, convertible notes, and a $100 billion private placement to Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, seen as a major vote of confidence from value investors. Alphabet's move comes amid strong Q1 2026 results, with revenue hitting $110 billion and cloud backlog surpassing $460 billion. This offering signals the start of a massive AI funding supercycle. SpaceX is set for a $750 billion IPO, while AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI have also confidentially filed for public listings targeting trillion-dollar valuations. Analysts estimate total AI-related equity issuance in 2026 could reach $400 billion, dwarfing previous records. The flood of supply raises questions about market absorption, with historical data showing significant post-IPO pullbacks. Some advise investors seeking AI exposure to consider established players like Alphabet, which offers growth potential with comparatively lower risk than pure-play AI startups.

marsbit34m ago

Google's $85 Billion Secondary Offering Breaks Historical Record, Buffett Invests $10 Billion in AI Infrastructure

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Futures