Monero Gains Momentum After Recent Sell-Off, Faces Resistance at $363

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

Monero (XMR) is showing signs of stabilization around $340.26 after a sharp sell-off from its January highs near $790. The cryptocurrency is currently consolidating within a range of $320 to $350. Despite the recent rebound from intra-week lows, the overall trend remains bearish, with XMR trading below key moving averages including the 200-day SMA at $363.14, which now acts as a major resistance level. Immediate support is found near the 7-day SMA at $326.43. The RSI indicates oversold conditions but suggests a potential short-term recovery. If support fails, XMR could retest the $270 level.

Monero (XMR), the privacy‐focused cryptocurrency, showing signs of stabilization on the daily chart after a significant sell-off from its January highs near $790. As of today, XMR trades around $340.26, consolidating in the $320 to $350 range following a sharp downtrend over the past week.

After being triggered by a technical break‐and‐fail pattern, the current pattern reflects a rebound from recent intra‐week lows. This move follows a surge earlier in the year and subsequent correction.

Monero Shows Bearish Trend, Key Levels in Focus

Technical indicators from Binance’s daily chart highlight a predominantly bearish trend. The XMR price remains below critical moving averages, including the 30-day SMA at $470.47, 50-day SMA at $464.86, 100-day SMA at $431.80, and 200-day SMA at $363.14. However, it is holding just above the short-term 7-day SMA at $326.43, which currently provides immediate support.

Zooming in, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) shows that momentum is still oversold, with a reading near -20.27, but recent RSI movements suggest a slight easing of bearish pressure, indicating a possible short-term recovery or consolidation phase.

If XMR continues the uptrend the Key resistance lies at the 200-day SMA around $363, with stronger resistance expected between $430 and $470, where it failed to boost the bull earlier. A break above these levels would be necessary to signal a sustained reversal from the current bearish trend.

If the price fails to maintain support near the 7-day SMA, it may retest recent lows near $270, marking another critical support zone.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Ethereum Slips Toward $1,900 as Selling Pressure Intensifies

TagsAltcoinCrypto MarketMoneroXMR

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trading price of Monero (XMR) and what range has it been consolidating in?

AMonero is currently trading around $340.26 and has been consolidating in the $320 to $350 range.

QWhat is the key resistance level that Monero is facing according to the 200-day SMA?

AThe key resistance level is at the 200-day Simple Moving Average (SMA), which is around $363.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading near -20.27 indicate about Monero's momentum?

AThe RSI reading near -20.27 indicates that the momentum is still oversold, but recent movements suggest a slight easing of bearish pressure, pointing to a possible short-term recovery or consolidation.

QWhat could happen if Monero fails to maintain support near its 7-day SMA?

AIf Monero fails to maintain support near the 7-day SMA at $326.43, it may retest recent lows near $270, which is another critical support zone.

QBetween which price levels is stronger resistance expected for Monero, according to the article?

AStronger resistance is expected between $430 and $470, where it previously failed to boost the bull run.

Related Reads

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit36m ago

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit36m ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2h ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片