Just Now, Ilya Drops Another Mind-Blowing Image ‘The Thinker’: What’s on His Mind in the Ocean of AI Chips?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-25Last updated on 2026-05-25

Abstract

Shortly after going quiet, Ilya Sutskever, AI's enigmatic spiritual leader, posted a mysterious sketch titled "The Thinker" on Instagram. The drawing depicts Rodin's iconic sculpture perched on a cliff, contemplating a vast, purple microscopic universe made of transistors and digital circuits—a chip die shot—signed "IS 2026." This cryptic image, saying "nothing yet everything," ignited widespread speculation in Silicon Valley. Some see it as a search for sacred meaning in silicon, others as a silent critique of brute-force compute scaling. It echoes Ilya's past influence, like the original OpenAI logo he once doodled on a wall. The post coincided with a triple announcement from OpenAI, intensifying the frenzy. First, an internal reasoning model discovered new geometric constructions, challenging a long-standing conjecture and impressing Fields Medalist Tim Gowers. Second, Codex for Mac introduced "Appshots," allowing it to access application windows—even text outside the view—and gained features like Goal Mode, a built-in browser, and plugin capabilities, evolving from a coding assistant into a persistent "resident engineer." Third, reports surfaced that OpenAI is preparing for a confidential IPO filing with banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, potentially eyeing a fall public listing. Together, these moves signal that AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is not a distant slogan but an active force reshaping science, software engineering, and capital markets. Ilya...

[Introduction] "Saying nothing, yet saying everything." Ilya ignited the internet with a depiction of "The Thinker" on a Die Shot.

Just now, Ilya, the most enigmatic spiritual leader in the AI community, posted a painting on Instagram.

In the image, Rodin's "The Thinker" stands on the edge of a cliff, gazing down at a microscopic universe woven from purple transistors and digital circuits.

That ocean is technically known as a Die Shot – the microscopic cross-section of a chip, a pure jungle of silicon transistors.

In the bottom right corner, a black signature reads: IS 2026.

And just like that, Silicon Valley exploded.

Saying Nothing, Yet Saying Everything

He had vanished for a long time.

This time, people began frantically interpreting the painting.

Does "IS" stand for his initials Ilya Sutskever, or does it imply something else? Is the figure contemplating on the chip suggesting he's holding something?

This kind of silent detonation is not Ilya's first time.

Many don't know that OpenAI's long-standing three-flower logo originated from a casual doodle he sketched on a hallway wall.

That unremarkable draft later became the face of the AI company with the highest valuation.

Now, in the same manner, he has forcefully pressed an ancient symbol of human philosophy onto the cold, hard substrate of a semiconductor.

Some say he's seeking a sense of the sacred.

Others say it's his silent mockery of the old path that "intelligence can be stacked by stacking computing power."

At the Same Time, OpenAI Insiders Can't Sit Still

This time, the frenzy isn't just employees lining up on X to shout "Feel the AGI."

Almost within the same week, OpenAI dropped three bombshells in succession:

First, mathematics.

OpenAI announced that one of its internal general-purpose reasoning models discovered a whole new family of geometric constructions, overturning a long-standing conjecture regarding the "planar unit distance problem."

OpenAI stated that its proof has been checked by external mathematicians, refreshing the understanding of AI held by Fields Medalist Tim Gowers.

Next, came Codex.

The Mac version of Codex introduced Appshots. Just press Command-Command, and the current application window can be directly handed over to a Codex thread.

It receives not just a screenshot, but also the text within the window, even content not visible off-screen.

Simultaneously, Codex upgraded its Goal Mode, built-in browser, and plugin capabilities.

More radically, the media noted:

Codex can now continue to call applications even when the Mac is locked, truly evolving from a "coding assistant" to an "on-site engineer."

What most excites Silicon Valley, however, is the IPO.

According to multiple media reports, OpenAI is collaborating with investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to prepare a confidential submission of IPO filing documents.

Relevant documents could be filed soon, coinciding with SpaceX's listing timeline.

Bloomberg, citing informed sources, reported that OpenAI aims to go public this fall, though the specific timing may still change.

When these three events are placed together, the implication is entirely different.

This is the core of the latest round of OpenAI-style frenzy: tearing open new frontiers in mathematics, having AI take over programmers' computers, and propelling itself towards what could be the most significant IPO window in AI history.

This is OpenAI signaling to the outside world: AGI is not a distant slogan, but a real variable that is simultaneously rewriting science, software, and capital markets.

Conclusion

Three events combined point to the same question: Is that door truly about to open?

Behind a casually drawn sketch lies the silent transistor base within the Die Shot – the boundary between human intelligence and the silicon-based world is becoming increasingly blurred.

Ilya is betting not on a feature, but on a paradigm shift.

And the internal OpenAI phrase "Feel the AGI" is the most genuine signal from the research frontlines – not marketing, but an inability to hold back any longer.

Our generation will most likely witness the answer with our own eyes.

References:

https://www.instagram.com/ilyasu2/

https://x.com/ns123abc/status/2058687603285586245?s=20

This article is from WeChat official account "New Zhiyuan", author: ASI Revelation

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWho is Ilya and what is the significance of the 'Thinker' image he posted?

AIlya is a mysterious spiritual leader in the AI community, often associated with OpenAI. The 'Thinker' image he posted, which depicts the famous sculpture standing over a chip die shot, is significant because it ignited widespread discussion and interpretation. It's seen as a symbolic gesture, potentially hinting at deep contemplation about the relationship between human intellect and silicon-based AI, or a critique of the belief that brute-force computing alone can lead to intelligence.

QWhat are the three major announcements or developments from OpenAI mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions three key developments from OpenAI: 1) An internal general reasoning model discovered a new family of geometric constructions, overturning a long-standing conjecture about the 'plane unit distance problem'. 2) Codex for Mac received significant upgrades, including Appshots for capturing application windows, Goal Mode, a built-in browser, and plugin capabilities, evolving it from a code assistant to a 'resident engineer'. 3) OpenAI is reportedly preparing for a secret IPO filing with banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, aiming for a potential public listing in the fall.

QWhat is a 'Die Shot' as described in the context of Ilya's image?

AIn the context of Ilya's image, a 'Die Shot' refers to a microscopic cross-sectional view or image of a computer chip. It reveals the intricate landscape of transistors and digital circuits etched onto the silicon wafer, described in the article as a 'purple transistor and digital circuit woven microscopic universe' or a 'transistor jungle'.

QAccording to the article, what does the collective timing of OpenAI's announcements and Ilya's post suggest?

AThe article suggests that the collective timing of OpenAI's announcements (mathematical discovery, Codex upgrades, IPO preparations) and Ilya's symbolic post sends a powerful signal. It indicates that AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is not a distant slogan but a real variable currently reshaping science, software development, and capital markets simultaneously. It points to a potential paradigm shift.

QWhat is the origin of OpenAI's three-flower logo according to the article?

AAccording to the article, OpenAI's iconic three-flower logo originated from a casual doodle that Ilya sketched on a corridor wall. This simple draft later became the official face of what is now one of the highest-valued AI companies.

Related Reads

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

When users complained that Claude was "getting dumber," the root cause wasn't the AI model itself. In an official blog post, Anthropic clarified the critical difference between two key settings in Claude Code: Model and Effort. Model refers to the core "brain"—the fixed, trained weights of a specific AI (like Sonnet, Opus, or Fable). Changing the Model addresses *capability* ("can it do this?"), but its knowledge is static post-training. Effort, however, controls the AI's *approach and thoroughness* for a specific task. A higher Effort level instructs Claude to read more files, run tests, perform verification, and complete multi-step reasoning before responding, significantly increasing its "work output" for that job. Conversely, low Effort leads to quicker, less thorough replies. This distinction explains the March 2024 uproar where users experienced a sudden drop in Claude's performance. The cause was not a model change but Anthropic quietly lowering the *default* Effort setting from "high" to "medium" to reduce latency, which was later reverted. The key insight is that a smaller, capable model (like Sonnet) on high Effort can often outperform a larger, more powerful model (like Opus) on low Effort for many tasks. The article provides a practical troubleshooting framework: if Claude makes an error, first check the context and instructions. If it seems to skip necessary steps or validations, increase Effort. If it diligently attempts the task but fails conceptually or makes consistent factual errors despite good context, then consider switching to a more capable Model. The takeaway is a shift in focus: effective AI programming is less about always choosing the "strongest" model and more about intelligently *orchestrating* models and effort levels—acting like a project manager to assign the right "brain" with the right level of diligence for each job, optimizing both results and cost.

marsbit11m ago

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

marsbit11m ago

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is undergoing significant internal turmoil and functional erosion. Following its largest-ever layoff of 54 staff (20% of its workforce) and a major organizational restructuring announced in June, its Protocol Support Team has been officially dissolved. This comes alongside the high-profile resignation of key figures like co-executive director Xiaowei Wang, bringing senior departures this year to at least eight. Criticism of EF's rigid structure, opaque decision-making, and perceived lack of a clear value narrative for ETH has intensified within the community. The layoffs have catalyzed the emergence of independent, non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers and members. These entities are now taking on core functions such as protocol research/development and institutional adoption, effectively fragmenting the EF's traditional leadership role. Concurrently, EF's security team is adapting to technological change, deploying specialized AI agents to audit Ethereum's codebase, which successfully discovered a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-34219). While EF states AI complements rather than replaces researchers, it signals a potential future shift in its operational model. Faced with these challenges—internal restructuring, talent drain, the rise of competing organizations, and AI integration—the Ethereum Foundation appears to be stepping back from a central commanding role. Analysts and community observers speculate it may increasingly transition towards a symbolic "ecosystem mascot" function, while decentralized initiatives drive Ethereum's future growth and institutional adoption.

marsbit37m ago

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

marsbit37m ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbit3h ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片